Jim Leyland談Hamels的禁賽

看板MLB作者時間12年前 (2012/05/08 17:48), 編輯推噓29(31推 2噓 19→)
留言52則, 36人參與, 最新討論串1/1
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120508/SPORTS0104/205080335/1004/ "I think five games is way too light," Leyland said. "Personally, if I was making that vote, it would be a 15-game suspension — at least. Leyland "我想五場禁賽太少了。如果是我的話，至少要禁他個15場比賽" "I don't know Cole Hamels, so I certainly don't have any qualms with Cole Hamels. I don't know the man. I know he's a very good pitcher, a very talented guy. "If my pitcher went out and, almost in a braggadocious way, talked about hitting a guy and that 'I did it on purpose.' (a five-game suspension) is not enough. There's no way. "You know, we're always talking about our game being cleaned up and doing the right things for our game in all areas," said Leyland, "and I'm 100 percent for that. But this is a perfect time to show that we mean business." "It becomes a joke. Let's tell it like it is." -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.109.64.234
→
05/08 17:52, , 1F
大家來補刀。
05/08 17:52, 1F
推
05/08 17:53, , 2F
推
05/08 17:53, 2F
→
05/08 17:54, , 3F
這%數越來越高，都要退到大西洋去了
05/08 17:54, 3F
推
05/08 17:59, , 4F
爽
05/08 17:59, 4F
推
05/08 18:03, , 5F
禁賽5場 只是把輪值向後排而已 多休一二天
05/08 18:03, 5F
→
05/08 18:07, , 6F
推
05/08 18:07, 6F
推
05/08 18:10, , 7F
推 禁一次先發感覺沒很傷......................
05/08 18:10, 7F
推
05/08 18:11, , 8F
根本沒禁到，還多休一天，超爽的
05/08 18:11, 8F
推
05/08 18:12, , 9F
大家來比老
05/08 18:12, 9F
推
05/08 18:16, , 10F
Leyland都講話了 XD
05/08 18:16, 10F
推
05/08 18:22, , 11F
等哪天記者觀落陰找到Cy Young發言就更老了
05/08 18:22, 11F
→
05/08 18:25, , 12F
當然 又不是自己隊的球員，嘴砲當然打越大越好
05/08 18:25, 12F
→
05/08 18:25, , 13F
如果是老虎他會這樣說嗎？ 如果是美中的他大概會說
05/08 18:25, 13F
→
05/08 18:25, , 14F
要禁個100場最好吧
05/08 18:25, 14F
→
05/08 18:26, , 15F
有人要貼傳說中的費城媒體嘛？XD
05/08 18:26, 15F
推
05/08 18:28, , 16F
砸的要是白襪新秀的話，連歐巴馬都會跳出來
05/08 18:28, 16F
推
05/08 18:29, , 17F
這樣的結果就是月底的兩隊連戰 應該會神經超緊繃..
05/08 18:29, 17F
→
05/08 18:33, , 18F
人家就是在製造世仇話題啊，沒什麼好大驚小怪吧
05/08 18:33, 18F
推
05/08 18:34, , 19F
聯盟到底在想啥 對SP而言禁5場根本和沒禁賽沒兩樣
05/08 18:34, 19F
推
05/08 18:34, , 20F
問題是兩隊都傷兵累累了...orz...禁不起再受創..
05/08 18:34, 20F
→
05/08 18:38, , 21F
老磨牙還沒初登版 就在當總教練的都出來講了 @@
05/08 18:38, 21F
→
05/08 18:41, , 22F
華盛頓郵報現在世仇確實炒的蠻兇
05/08 18:41, 22F
推
05/08 18:42, , 23F
禁5場不痛不癢
05/08 18:42, 23F
→
05/08 18:42, , 24F
不過Hamels不先砸那一下也炒不起來啊
05/08 18:42, 24F
→
05/08 18:43, , 25F
啊難不成是國民行銷團隊要Hamels砸的嗎XU
05/08 18:43, 25F
推
05/08 18:44, , 26F
真的要吵世仇論 下次大概得砸小史..應該就會一路下去了
05/08 18:44, 26F
推
05/08 18:45, , 27F
砸小史大概兩邊就打起來了
05/08 18:45, 27F
→
05/08 18:45, , 28F
ZZZ 要不要全部教練問一問? 少無聊了 黑魔使總能不爽吧?
05/08 18:45, 28F
→
05/08 18:48, , 29F
現役第1 史上第15 對面要找老皮 老拉 老托 還是Cox救火?
05/08 18:48, 29F
推
05/08 18:48, , 30F
每問一個人就可以PO一篇超棒的
05/08 18:48, 30F
推
05/08 18:59, , 31F
大聯盟應該要更改一下SP禁賽的場次問題了
05/08 18:59, 31F
推
05/08 19:00, , 32F
其實Hamels不想去國民，但怕經紀人腦殘只好先打預防針
05/08 19:00, 32F
推
05/08 19:02, , 33F
結果根本是聯盟的指令，要營造世仇？ XD
05/08 19:02, 33F
推
05/08 19:04, , 34F
應該永不錄用
05/08 19:04, 34F
→
05/08 19:08, , 35F
眼紅人家明星新秀
05/08 19:08, 35F
推
05/08 19:25, , 36F
找Leyland訪問 因為大家都知道 此老快人快語 一定有話直說
05/08 19:25, 36F
推
05/08 19:27, , 37F
找Torre大概是..「Hamels這孩子讓我很舒服」嗎？XD
05/08 19:27, 37F
推
05/08 19:34, , 38F
Torre: 這觸身球讓我很舒湖
05/08 19:34, 38F
推
05/08 20:30, , 39F
炒作成分居高
05/08 20:30, 39F
推
05/08 20:34, , 40F
Torre討厭Harper?
05/08 20:34, 40F
→
05/08 20:40, , 41F
樓上怎會聯想到那 囧rz
05/08 20:40, 41F
噓
05/08 20:53, , 42F
干你啥事 砸到你了嗎
05/08 20:53, 42F
推
05/08 21:05, , 43F
推李蘭爺
05/08 21:05, 43F
噓
05/08 21:41, , 44F
講的好像自己沒下令砸過人一樣...
05/08 21:41, 44F
推
05/08 21:50, , 45F
沒跟到這事件 之前有文章有分享可以看發生甚麼事情嗎?
05/08 21:50, 45F
推
05/08 21:57, , 46F
不會無緣無故下令砸人吧 這種簡單邏輯都不懂嗎
05/08 21:57, 46F
推
05/08 22:25, , 47F
這一票正港old school的梯次越來越高了
05/08 22:25, 47F
推
05/09 08:57, , 48F
看到一群人護航的理由還真好笑,不爽就可以砸學弟喔?
05/09 08:57, 48F
→
05/09 08:58, , 49F
那新秀打者對上黑魔使要小心點,他只要奇摩子不好就要丟人!
05/09 08:58, 49F
→
05/09 13:01, , 50F
這樣有壓制力加成吧(誤
05/09 13:01, 50F
推
05/10 04:28, , 51F
砸人沒差啊 但是搬一條「這是潛規則(因為你是新秀)」
05/10 04:28, 51F
→
05/10 04:29, , 52F
就讓人一頭霧水了 新秀真的得要活該挨老鳥砸？
05/10 04:29, 52F
‣ 更多 abc12812 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1FgEm7b0 (MLB)