Re: [閒聊] Mark Reynolds是現在最糟糕的三壘手?
※ 引述《charliee (Double E)》之銘言:
: Mark Reynolds昨天的失誤讓洋基多拿了兩分
: 延長賽12局上半一人出局三壘有人,一個界外區飛球,他也沒有趕過去接
: 場邊的金鶯球迷傳出了不滿聲音,有人喊 "Reynolds, you're killing us!"
: 還有人直接對他喊 "You suck!"
: Reynolds確實有跟大棒子,但事實上,他已經連續四年蟬聯大聯盟三振王
: 同時過去四季中有三季,他都是失誤最多的選手
: Reynolds的棒子也許能夠幫助金鶯,但是他的防守確實給金鶯內野帶來相當程度的傷害
: 不信看看同為內野手的Robert Andino這三年來的表情變化也許可以說明一切
: http://media.zenfs.com/en/blogs/sptusmlbexperts/sadandino.jpg

→
04/12 13:48,
04/12 13:48
推
04/12 13:51,
04/12 13:51
推
04/12 13:52,
04/12 13:52
2008 #19OUaca2
2009 #1AlVWOOe
2010 #1CHm3uPt 上半季
2011 #1EE0PacJ
在本版就能找到的防守數據,從 08 年開始,他的防守就是倒數有名的,
之前是因為他三振能力實在太搶眼,所以提到他,大多會跟電風扇聯想在
一起;不過,就我"印象",他在三壘的防守,去年已經開始有人用"人型立牌"
來形容,即便沒有陳偉殷,我想許多版友應該也不會覺得他防守好
我覺得 jerho版友的說法不無道理,如果沒有陳偉殷,他可能不會因為一
、兩場的失誤,就被提出來討論,但 danlai 版友的推文讓我覺得反應過
度了
我想會有這想法的立基,在于台媒在台藉(裔)球員有好表現,就會大力
吹捧、甚至近乎造神,讓人感到厭惡,但是 danlai 版友(或類似的)思
考方式,不也是類似台媒;在有利於台籍(裔)報導、或言論出來,不管
報導內容是否屬實,就直接認為他只是吹捧,一面倒的否認
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.44.218.55
推
04/12 17:16, , 1F
04/12 17:16, 1F
推
04/12 17:18, , 2F
04/12 17:18, 2F
→
04/12 17:18, , 3F
04/12 17:18, 3F
推
04/12 17:19, , 4F
04/12 17:19, 4F
推
04/12 17:20, , 5F
04/12 17:20, 5F
推
04/12 17:20, , 6F
04/12 17:20, 6F
推
04/12 17:30, , 7F
04/12 17:30, 7F
→
04/12 17:31, , 8F
04/12 17:31, 8F
→
04/12 17:34, , 9F
04/12 17:34, 9F
→
04/12 17:36, , 10F
04/12 17:36, 10F
推
04/12 17:38, , 11F
04/12 17:38, 11F
→
04/12 17:38, , 12F
04/12 17:38, 12F
推
04/12 17:39, , 13F
04/12 17:39, 13F
推
04/12 17:41, , 14F
04/12 17:41, 14F
推
04/12 17:43, , 15F
04/12 17:43, 15F
推
04/12 17:47, , 16F
04/12 17:47, 16F
→
04/12 17:51, , 17F
04/12 17:51, 17F
→
04/12 17:57, , 18F
04/12 17:57, 18F
推
04/12 18:04, , 19F
04/12 18:04, 19F
推
04/12 18:07, , 20F
04/12 18:07, 20F
→
04/12 18:09, , 21F
04/12 18:09, 21F
推
04/12 18:10, , 22F
04/12 18:10, 22F
→
04/12 18:11, , 23F
04/12 18:11, 23F
→
04/12 18:13, , 24F
04/12 18:13, 24F
→
04/12 18:40, , 25F
04/12 18:40, 25F
推
04/12 18:44, , 26F
04/12 18:44, 26F
→
04/12 18:52, , 27F
04/12 18:52, 27F
→
04/12 18:53, , 28F
04/12 18:53, 28F
推
04/12 19:01, , 29F
04/12 19:01, 29F
推
04/12 19:02, , 30F
04/12 19:02, 30F
→
04/12 19:02, , 31F
04/12 19:02, 31F
推
04/12 19:04, , 32F
04/12 19:04, 32F
推
04/12 19:22, , 33F
04/12 19:22, 33F
推
04/12 19:30, , 34F
04/12 19:30, 34F
推
04/12 19:41, , 35F
04/12 19:41, 35F
推
04/12 19:50, , 36F
04/12 19:50, 36F
推
04/12 20:03, , 37F
04/12 20:03, 37F
推
04/12 20:04, , 38F
04/12 20:04, 38F
→
04/12 20:04, , 39F
04/12 20:04, 39F
→
04/12 20:04, , 40F
04/12 20:04, 40F
→
04/12 20:05, , 41F
04/12 20:05, 41F
推
04/12 22:15, , 42F
04/12 22:15, 42F
→
04/12 22:17, , 43F
04/12 22:17, 43F
推
04/12 23:44, , 44F
04/12 23:44, 44F
→
04/12 23:46, , 45F
04/12 23:46, 45F
推
04/12 23:49, , 46F
04/12 23:49, 46F
推
04/12 23:50, , 47F
04/12 23:50, 47F
推
04/12 23:53, , 48F
04/12 23:53, 48F
推
04/13 00:06, , 49F
04/13 00:06, 49F
→
04/13 00:31, , 50F
04/13 00:31, 50F
→
04/13 00:34, , 51F
04/13 00:34, 51F
推
04/13 00:41, , 52F
04/13 00:41, 52F
推
04/13 01:39, , 53F
04/13 01:39, 53F
推
04/13 01:44, , 54F
04/13 01:44, 54F
推
04/13 01:51, , 55F
04/13 01:51, 55F
→
04/13 01:52, , 56F
04/13 01:52, 56F
→
04/13 01:52, , 57F
04/13 01:52, 57F
→
04/13 01:52, , 58F
04/13 01:52, 58F
→
04/13 01:53, , 59F
04/13 01:53, 59F
推
04/13 03:10, , 60F
04/13 03:10, 60F
推
04/13 03:27, , 61F
04/13 03:27, 61F
推
04/13 03:42, , 62F
04/13 03:42, 62F
推
04/13 22:55, , 63F
04/13 22:55, 63F
→
04/13 22:56, , 64F
04/13 22:56, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):