[討論] 季後賽第一場,費城人該派誰先發?
Halladay雖然是例行賽頭號Ace
但是他在季後賽的表現只能說差強人意
除了第一次無安打比賽以外
另外兩場7IP 4ER 6IP 2ER
以他的水準來說真的不是很好
尤其在季後賽是場場必爭
反觀例行賽第二號的Cliff Lee
季後賽成績跟鬼神一樣,也只有去年WS第一場失常
還有前年WS第五場硬撐,不過那是面對洋基
其他場次完全惡魔約,包括之後面對洋基照樣切割
反觀Halladay季後賽經驗少
很強有Ace水準,但是不像Lee是惡魔約水準
所以第一場先派Lee的可能性高嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.32.89.174
→
09/26 11:56, , 1F
09/26 11:56, 1F
推
09/26 11:56, , 2F
09/26 11:56, 2F
更正
推
09/26 11:56, , 3F
09/26 11:56, 3F
※ 編輯: snowkyo 來自: 114.32.89.174 (09/26 11:56)
→
09/26 11:57, , 4F
09/26 11:57, 4F
→
09/26 11:57, , 5F
09/26 11:57, 5F
也就一場無安打,剩下的只能算是符合水準吧
Lee根本是超水準連殺
Halladay只是不太爆炸(也只有無安打那場宰人),Lee是根本從頭宰到尾
推
09/26 11:58, , 6F
09/26 11:58, 6F
→
09/26 11:58, , 7F
09/26 11:58, 7F
推
09/26 11:58, , 8F
09/26 11:58, 8F
→
09/26 11:58, , 9F
09/26 11:58, 9F
推
09/26 11:59, , 10F
09/26 11:59, 10F
※ 編輯: snowkyo 來自: 114.32.89.174 (09/26 12:00)
→
09/26 11:59, , 11F
09/26 11:59, 11F
→
09/26 12:01, , 12F
09/26 12:01, 12F
→
09/26 12:01, , 13F
09/26 12:01, 13F
噓
09/26 12:03, , 14F
09/26 12:03, 14F
→
09/26 12:03, , 15F
09/26 12:03, 15F
→
09/26 12:04, , 16F
09/26 12:04, 16F
噓
09/26 12:04, , 17F
09/26 12:04, 17F
噓
09/26 12:05, , 18F
09/26 12:05, 18F
推
09/26 12:06, , 19F
09/26 12:06, 19F
推
09/26 12:06, , 20F
09/26 12:06, 20F
噓
09/26 12:07, , 21F
09/26 12:07, 21F
噓
09/26 12:08, , 22F
09/26 12:08, 22F
噓
09/26 12:08, , 23F
09/26 12:08, 23F
推
09/26 12:12, , 24F
09/26 12:12, 24F
噓
09/26 12:12, , 25F
09/26 12:12, 25F
噓
09/26 12:12, , 26F
09/26 12:12, 26F
噓
09/26 12:14, , 27F
09/26 12:14, 27F
噓
09/26 12:21, , 28F
09/26 12:21, 28F
噓
09/26 12:24, , 29F
09/26 12:24, 29F
噓
09/26 12:28, , 30F
09/26 12:28, 30F
→
09/26 12:33, , 31F
09/26 12:33, 31F
→
09/26 12:36, , 32F
09/26 12:36, 32F
→
09/26 12:41, , 33F
09/26 12:41, 33F
→
09/26 12:44, , 34F
09/26 12:44, 34F
→
09/26 12:46, , 35F
09/26 12:46, 35F
→
09/26 12:48, , 36F
09/26 12:48, 36F
噓
09/26 12:50, , 37F
09/26 12:50, 37F
噓
09/26 13:04, , 38F
09/26 13:04, 38F
推
09/26 13:10, , 39F
09/26 13:10, 39F
→
09/26 13:11, , 40F
09/26 13:11, 40F
噓
09/26 13:13, , 41F
09/26 13:13, 41F
噓
09/26 13:17, , 42F
09/26 13:17, 42F
噓
09/26 13:21, , 43F
09/26 13:21, 43F
噓
09/26 13:24, , 44F
09/26 13:24, 44F
→
09/26 13:30, , 45F
09/26 13:30, 45F
噓
09/26 13:33, , 46F
09/26 13:33, 46F
噓
09/26 13:35, , 47F
09/26 13:35, 47F
噓
09/26 13:37, , 48F
09/26 13:37, 48F
噓
09/26 13:39, , 49F
09/26 13:39, 49F
噓
09/26 13:48, , 50F
09/26 13:48, 50F
噓
09/26 13:54, , 51F
09/26 13:54, 51F
噓
09/26 13:56, , 52F
09/26 13:56, 52F
噓
09/26 14:00, , 53F
09/26 14:00, 53F
噓
09/26 14:00, , 54F
09/26 14:00, 54F
噓
09/26 14:07, , 55F
09/26 14:07, 55F
噓
09/26 14:11, , 56F
09/26 14:11, 56F
噓
09/26 14:16, , 57F
09/26 14:16, 57F
噓
09/26 15:00, , 58F
09/26 15:00, 58F
→
09/26 15:02, , 59F
09/26 15:02, 59F
噓
09/26 15:18, , 60F
09/26 15:18, 60F
噓
09/26 15:24, , 61F
09/26 15:24, 61F
噓
09/26 15:24, , 62F
09/26 15:24, 62F
噓
09/26 15:49, , 63F
09/26 15:49, 63F
噓
09/26 15:50, , 64F
09/26 15:50, 64F
噓
09/26 16:06, , 65F
09/26 16:06, 65F
→
09/26 16:20, , 66F
09/26 16:20, 66F
→
09/26 16:24, , 67F
09/26 16:24, 67F
噓
09/26 16:29, , 68F
09/26 16:29, 68F
噓
09/26 16:45, , 69F
09/26 16:45, 69F
噓
09/26 17:18, , 70F
09/26 17:18, 70F
噓
09/26 17:33, , 71F
09/26 17:33, 71F
噓
09/26 17:43, , 72F
09/26 17:43, 72F
噓
09/26 17:49, , 73F
09/26 17:49, 73F
噓
09/26 17:49, , 74F
09/26 17:49, 74F
噓
09/26 18:17, , 75F
09/26 18:17, 75F
噓
09/26 18:52, , 76F
09/26 18:52, 76F
→
09/26 18:57, , 77F
09/26 18:57, 77F
噓
09/26 19:16, , 78F
09/26 19:16, 78F
噓
09/26 19:39, , 79F
09/26 19:39, 79F
噓
09/26 20:05, , 80F
09/26 20:05, 80F
噓
09/26 20:05, , 81F
09/26 20:05, 81F
噓
09/26 20:25, , 82F
09/26 20:25, 82F
推
09/26 20:45, , 83F
09/26 20:45, 83F
→
09/26 21:44, , 84F
09/26 21:44, 84F
噓
09/26 21:58, , 85F
09/26 21:58, 85F
噓
09/26 22:06, , 86F
09/26 22:06, 86F
噓
09/26 23:15, , 87F
09/26 23:15, 87F
噓
09/26 23:32, , 88F
09/26 23:32, 88F
噓
09/27 04:15, , 89F
09/27 04:15, 89F
噓
09/27 13:52, , 90F
09/27 13:52, 90F
噓
09/29 21:40, , 91F
09/29 21:40, 91F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
-48
91