[閒聊] Jair Jurrjens vs Jered Weaver
Jair Jurrjens & Jered Weaver,這兩位新生代的強投
兩聯盟的ERA領先者,正一步步地挑戰前輩們保持的紀錄
2011 Jurrjens vs 1994 Greg Maddux
W L ERA GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WHIP H/9 HR/9 BB/9 SO/9 SO/BB
J 11 3 1.89 15 104.2 88 22 5 23 63 202 1.06 7.6 0.4 2.0 5.4 2.74
M 16 6 1.56 25 202.0 150 35 4 31 156 271 0.90 6.7 0.2 1.4 7.0 5.03
2011 Weaver vs 2000 Pedro Martinez
W L ERA GS IP H ER HR BB SO ERA+ WHIP H/9 HR/9 BB/9 SO/9 SO/BB
J 10 4 1.92 18 131.1 91 28 5 30 114 192 0.92 6.2 0.3 2.1 7.8 3.80
M 18 6 1.74 29 217.0 128 42 17 32 284 291 0.74 5.3 0.7 1.3 11.8 8.88
雖說其實是接近完敗的狀態(笑)
但Jurrjens目前的ERA,近十六年來也只輸給2005年的Roger Clemens(1.87)
Weaver更是近三十年來第二低的優異表現
能否繼續挺進下去,就要看他們兩個的續航力
當然若考量到Maddux和Pedro身處在一個打擊爆發的年代...
無論如何,還是希望他們兩個能持續有好表現 - -
--
◣ ◢
=. .= http://0rz.tw/ad4Js
◣
時代が進もうと﹑人の根本は何一つ變わらない!惡意が人間の本性だ!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.42.104.104
推
07/06 14:40, , 1F
07/06 14:40, 1F
推
07/06 14:42, , 2F
07/06 14:42, 2F
推
07/06 14:42, , 3F
07/06 14:42, 3F
→
07/06 14:43, , 4F
07/06 14:43, 4F
推
07/06 14:46, , 5F
07/06 14:46, 5F
推
07/06 14:46, , 6F
07/06 14:46, 6F
推
07/06 14:51, , 7F
07/06 14:51, 7F
推
07/06 14:54, , 8F
07/06 14:54, 8F
推
07/06 15:04, , 9F
07/06 15:04, 9F
推
07/06 15:06, , 10F
07/06 15:06, 10F
推
07/06 15:07, , 11F
07/06 15:07, 11F
推
07/06 15:25, , 12F
07/06 15:25, 12F
推
07/06 15:27, , 13F
07/06 15:27, 13F
推
07/06 15:28, , 14F
07/06 15:28, 14F
推
07/06 15:40, , 15F
07/06 15:40, 15F
推
07/06 15:52, , 16F
07/06 15:52, 16F
推
07/06 16:00, , 17F
07/06 16:00, 17F
推
07/06 16:05, , 18F
07/06 16:05, 18F
推
07/06 16:07, , 19F
07/06 16:07, 19F
推
07/06 16:07, , 20F
07/06 16:07, 20F
→
07/06 16:10, , 21F
07/06 16:10, 21F
推
07/06 16:14, , 22F
07/06 16:14, 22F
→
07/06 17:01, , 23F
07/06 17:01, 23F
→
07/06 17:03, , 24F
07/06 17:03, 24F
推
07/06 17:04, , 25F
07/06 17:04, 25F
推
07/06 17:12, , 26F
07/06 17:12, 26F
推
07/06 17:33, , 27F
07/06 17:33, 27F
推
07/06 18:26, , 28F
07/06 18:26, 28F
推
07/06 18:49, , 29F
07/06 18:49, 29F
推
07/06 19:05, , 30F
07/06 19:05, 30F
推
07/06 19:12, , 31F
07/06 19:12, 31F
推
07/06 19:27, , 32F
07/06 19:27, 32F
推
07/06 19:32, , 33F
07/06 19:32, 33F
推
07/06 19:58, , 34F
07/06 19:58, 34F
推
07/06 20:04, , 35F
07/06 20:04, 35F
推
07/06 20:10, , 36F
07/06 20:10, 36F
推
07/06 20:36, , 37F
07/06 20:36, 37F
推
07/06 20:59, , 38F
07/06 20:59, 38F
推
07/06 23:31, , 39F
07/06 23:31, 39F
推
07/07 00:52, , 40F
07/07 00:52, 40F
→
07/07 00:53, , 41F
07/07 00:53, 41F
推
07/07 01:11, , 42F
07/07 01:11, 42F
推
07/07 13:30, , 43F
07/07 13:30, 43F
推
07/08 14:28, , 44F
07/08 14:28, 44F
→
07/08 14:29, , 45F
07/08 14:29, 45F
→
07/08 14:29, , 46F
07/08 14:29, 46F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):