[麥書] 要灌雙系統還是買新筆電(windows系統)
(小妹不太懂,所以簡單說了Mac Air~抱歉,更改為Macbook Air)
我現在使用的是Macbook Air
瀏覽網頁等都覺得比windows好很多
不過現在遇到一個問題
因為要開始寫碩士論文(我知道版上有用page完成等)
但因為指導教授在格式上非常要求(字體、大小、表格等)
我發現用Macbook Air 之後除了沒有標楷體
整個格式到了一般電腦都會跑掉,連用PPT報告的時候
字體也會縮得很小等,讓我非常困擾
且手上現在也沒有桌上型或是一般電腦可以調整格式
所以現在考慮是否要買一台windows系統文書用的筆電
目前看的是比較滿意的價格大概是13700元
但也考慮是否灌雙系統(但真的不想讓mac有外物入侵啊~~)
想問雙系統後切換到windows系統後是否就跟一般的電腦一模一樣呢?
格式啊或是其他什麼的是否都會正常
這樣我就不用帶著兩台電腦爬爬造了
系統方面都有正版的可以使用,office也是
就只差買parallel了~啊還有灌的程序(實在令人覺得有夠麻煩)
如果是各位,會買新電腦還是灌雙系統呢?
謝謝大家。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.40.97.19
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MAC/M.1422805647.A.CAA.html
※ 編輯: vicky1989714 (114.40.97.19), 02/01/2015 23:50:14
推
02/01 23:51, , 1F
02/01 23:51, 1F
→
02/01 23:52, , 2F
02/01 23:52, 2F
→
02/01 23:55, , 3F
02/01 23:55, 3F
→
02/01 23:57, , 4F
02/01 23:57, 4F
推
02/01 23:59, , 5F
02/01 23:59, 5F
※ 編輯: vicky1989714 (114.40.97.19), 02/02/2015 00:04:28
噓
02/02 00:03, , 6F
02/02 00:03, 6F
推
02/02 00:06, , 7F
02/02 00:06, 7F
推
02/02 00:07, , 8F
02/02 00:07, 8F
→
02/02 00:07, , 9F
02/02 00:07, 9F
推
02/02 00:09, , 10F
02/02 00:09, 10F
→
02/02 00:09, , 11F
02/02 00:09, 11F
→
02/02 00:14, , 12F
02/02 00:14, 12F
推
02/02 00:21, , 13F
02/02 00:21, 13F
→
02/02 00:23, , 14F
02/02 00:23, 14F
→
02/02 00:23, , 15F
02/02 00:23, 15F
→
02/02 00:24, , 16F
02/02 00:24, 16F
→
02/02 00:25, , 17F
02/02 00:25, 17F
→
02/02 00:26, , 18F
02/02 00:26, 18F
推
02/02 00:27, , 19F
02/02 00:27, 19F
推
02/02 00:33, , 20F
02/02 00:33, 20F
推
02/02 01:21, , 21F
02/02 01:21, 21F
→
02/02 01:21, , 22F
02/02 01:21, 22F
推
02/02 01:21, , 23F
02/02 01:21, 23F
推
02/02 01:48, , 24F
02/02 01:48, 24F
推
02/02 02:30, , 25F
02/02 02:30, 25F
→
02/02 02:31, , 26F
02/02 02:31, 26F
→
02/02 02:31, , 27F
02/02 02:31, 27F
→
02/02 02:32, , 28F
02/02 02:32, 28F
→
02/02 02:33, , 29F
02/02 02:33, 29F
→
02/02 02:33, , 30F
02/02 02:33, 30F
→
02/02 02:35, , 31F
02/02 02:35, 31F
→
02/02 02:57, , 32F
02/02 02:57, 32F
推
02/02 07:50, , 33F
02/02 07:50, 33F
→
02/02 07:50, , 34F
02/02 07:50, 34F
→
02/02 07:58, , 35F
02/02 07:58, 35F
推
02/02 09:15, , 36F
02/02 09:15, 36F
→
02/02 09:15, , 37F
02/02 09:15, 37F
→
02/02 09:15, , 38F
02/02 09:15, 38F
→
02/02 09:16, , 39F
02/02 09:16, 39F
→
02/02 09:16, , 40F
02/02 09:16, 40F
推
02/02 09:59, , 41F
02/02 09:59, 41F
推
02/02 10:27, , 42F
02/02 10:27, 42F
推
02/02 10:36, , 43F
02/02 10:36, 43F
推
02/02 13:10, , 44F
02/02 13:10, 44F
→
02/02 13:22, , 45F
02/02 13:22, 45F
→
02/02 13:44, , 46F
02/02 13:44, 46F
推
02/02 15:31, , 47F
02/02 15:31, 47F
→
02/02 17:05, , 48F
02/02 17:05, 48F
推
02/02 17:14, , 49F
02/02 17:14, 49F
→
02/02 17:23, , 50F
02/02 17:23, 50F
推
02/02 17:30, , 51F
02/02 17:30, 51F
→
02/02 17:31, , 52F
02/02 17:31, 52F
推
02/02 18:22, , 53F
02/02 18:22, 53F
噓
02/02 23:43, , 54F
02/02 23:43, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):