Re: [討論] 部落格上BOT外國學生留言

看板LoveLive作者 (海靈)時間15年前 (2008/11/12 20:34), 編輯推噓6(609)
留言15則, 5人參與, 最新討論串4/4 (看更多)
※ 引述《ots (我終於換暱稱了)》之銘言: 我回好了... 有人要幫忙看看嗎? 沒問題的話一高幫我貼吧~ First of all,because you didn't describe the dogs you saw, we can't give you a specific explanation of the current status of the dogs. But we guessed that you might be talking about the 3 black dogs and 1 white dog near BOT dorm? If they are the dogs you mean in this message, we can assure you that hunger is no longer a problem for them since they came here. There are 2 volunteers who feed these dogs every night. Actually, they have been doing this long before we started TNR in NTU. But not until we fought for TNR policy in NTU could any dogs really stay here. Before all this TNR operation started, killing was the only policy! Anyway,if these 4 dogs were those you saw, maybe you're not familiar with how to tell a dog's body condition, or it may just be a misunderstanding. Now, except a few new comer dogs, all dogs in NTU have at least 1 regular feeder. We are very glad to see your strong concern about Taiwan's stray dogs. But we sincerely suggest you to understand more before judging. If we don't do TNR and use it to negotiate with school, these dogs would have very high possibilities of being sent to the public shelter, and be euthanized in the end. Talking about euthanasia in Taiwan's public stray animal shelter, a high percentage of it is actually quite cruel. Not mentioning the stress and fears the dogs would experience when they stay there. Here, we are trying our best to keep these animals from being harmed. And very luckily, we have these volunteers to solve the feeding problem. The last part is my personal opinion, not representivie of us. In Taiwan,stray animals' life status is often strict. But if you really observe them carefully, they all struggle to survive. And both their body and mind are incredibly strong. It is already a tragedy that people's irresponsiblility cause these animals to lack food, medical care,and home. But I believe these animals all cherish their lives, so how can we take this last belonging from them? I don't think we have the right to decide which live should be taken. This is my principle when treat these animals. Even if you don't agree with me, you can't doubt that I don't "love live". If you want to find out more about Taiwan's stray animals, you're more than welcome to join us. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.62.92.170

11/12 18:41,
說的好,第三段最後有個we是have的筆誤嗎?
11/12 18:41
※ 編輯: ots 來自: 61.62.92.170 (11/12 18:49) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.225.66.182

11/12 20:35, , 1F
我修改了一些文法...不過只改了一點點點
11/12 20:35, 1F

11/12 21:46, , 2F
對... 就是regular... 改得好阿orz
11/12 21:46, 2F

11/12 21:47, , 3F
不過suggest跟recommend的差別是?
11/12 21:47, 3F

11/12 22:10, , 4F
給樓上,語氣的不同而已,其實沒有太大的差別啦
11/12 22:10, 4F

11/12 22:27, , 5F
還是有差所以才會想改阿~ 我問的就是那個語氣的差異XD
11/12 22:27, 5F

11/13 09:05, , 6F
喔,suggest有請求的意思,recommend則比較帶有命令的語氣
11/13 09:05, 6F

11/13 22:00, , 7F
doubt那裡也要改。
11/13 22:00, 7F

11/13 22:03, , 8F
還有西方人(尤其是美國人)的觀念覺得安樂死不是什麼大
11/13 22:03, 8F

11/13 22:04, , 9F
不了的事。 我還聽過有人因為狗得癌症,醫藥費昂貴,又無
11/13 22:04, 9F

11/13 22:05, , 10F
法根治,獸醫乾脆建議主人安樂死的例子。
11/13 22:05, 10F

11/13 22:06, , 11F
他們認為與其讓狗suffer, 不如讓他sleep unpainfully
11/13 22:06, 11F

11/14 00:09, , 12F
不過我們重點應該是台灣收容所安樂死並不是"unpainful"
11/14 00:09, 12F

11/14 02:09, , 13F
我的另一的重點是 我不覺得人類有權做此決定
11/14 02:09, 13F

11/14 02:09, , 14F
安樂死用於重病動物 跟健康動物 是完全不同的兩件事阿
11/14 02:09, 14F

11/14 10:31, , 15F
同意樓上
11/14 10:31, 15F
文章代碼(AID): #196irg-v (LoveLive)
文章代碼(AID): #196irg-v (LoveLive)