[問題] 夜色緣界與平衡
AD 與 AP 角色
大致上
我覺得初期是AP佔了點優勢
但後期 AD >>>> AP
前陣子增加了“夜色緣界”這個道具
+物攻 +魔防
還能夠主動施放 技能護盾
(30秒冷卻時間也很短)
老實說,我覺得還蠻破壞平衡的
AP角色,因為傷害幾乎全來自“招式”
在遊戲推進中,為了維持影響力
不斷地升級AP攻擊裝備,是非常需要的
而相較下
物傷角色提供的傷害是持續性的
因此很多AD角,能夠增加更多的防禦裝備
而靠著一到兩件攻擊裝,仍然可以提供相當可觀的傷害
提供魔法防禦,並且還能夠加AD的道具
本來就有 魔提斯深淵 和 水星彎刀
加上本來的振奮和女妖
也是很常出的AP防裝
老實說再增加“夜色緣界”這道具
我是覺得太針對
甚至有點偏頗了
大家覺得呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.82.16.38
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1487095100.A.CF6.html
※ 編輯: werttrew (115.82.16.38), 02/15/2017 01:59:45
推
02/15 02:00, , 1F
02/15 02:00, 1F
→
02/15 02:00, , 2F
02/15 02:00, 2F
ad不只是指射手 而是物理攻擊的角色
※ 編輯: werttrew (115.82.16.38), 02/15/2017 02:00:43
推
02/15 02:00, , 3F
02/15 02:00, 3F
→
02/15 02:00, , 4F
02/15 02:00, 4F
→
02/15 02:01, , 5F
02/15 02:01, 5F
→
02/15 02:05, , 6F
02/15 02:05, 6F
推
02/15 02:06, , 7F
02/15 02:06, 7F
推
02/15 02:06, , 8F
02/15 02:06, 8F
提供魔法傷害並且有物理防禦的
也就只有一件沙漏 (錫科號角就算了..)
相較下卻有太多魔防+物攻 甚至還能擋招式的道具
給予ad角色太強的抗衡力
(AP角的招式被擋,比AD傷太多了)
推
02/15 02:06, , 9F
02/15 02:06, 9F
噓
02/15 02:12, , 10F
02/15 02:12, 10F
不用低調了
剛剛就打了一場ap對ad
前期大優勢
中後期根本打不動對面
可是他打我們他媽的超痛
人手一件夜色+魔提斯
還有+魔防血量的道具
搞小?
推
02/15 02:13, , 11F
02/15 02:13, 11F
※ 編輯: werttrew (115.82.16.38), 02/15/2017 02:16:18
推
02/15 02:21, , 12F
02/15 02:21, 12F
→
02/15 02:22, , 13F
02/15 02:22, 13F
冷卻真的神快
開了盾就爽進場
還能持續十秒 馬的逼
※ 編輯: werttrew (115.82.16.38), 02/15/2017 02:23:40
推
02/15 02:27, , 14F
02/15 02:27, 14F
→
02/15 02:27, , 15F
02/15 02:27, 15F
推
02/15 02:33, , 16F
02/15 02:33, 16F
→
02/15 02:33, , 17F
02/15 02:33, 17F
推
02/15 02:45, , 18F
02/15 02:45, 18F
→
02/15 02:46, , 19F
02/15 02:46, 19F
推
02/15 02:48, , 20F
02/15 02:48, 20F
推
02/15 02:53, , 21F
02/15 02:53, 21F
推
02/15 02:57, , 22F
02/15 02:57, 22F
→
02/15 02:57, , 23F
02/15 02:57, 23F
推
02/15 03:11, , 24F
02/15 03:11, 24F
→
02/15 03:11, , 25F
02/15 03:11, 25F
→
02/15 03:12, , 26F
02/15 03:12, 26F
噓
02/15 03:15, , 27F
02/15 03:15, 27F
→
02/15 03:16, , 28F
02/15 03:16, 28F
→
02/15 03:17, , 29F
02/15 03:17, 29F
→
02/15 03:18, , 30F
02/15 03:18, 30F
推
02/15 03:18, , 31F
02/15 03:18, 31F
→
02/15 03:19, , 32F
02/15 03:19, 32F
推
02/15 03:20, , 33F
02/15 03:20, 33F
→
02/15 03:22, , 34F
02/15 03:22, 34F
→
02/15 03:22, , 35F
02/15 03:22, 35F
推
02/15 03:28, , 36F
02/15 03:28, 36F
→
02/15 03:29, , 37F
02/15 03:29, 37F
推
02/15 03:40, , 38F
02/15 03:40, 38F
推
02/15 03:45, , 39F
02/15 03:45, 39F
推
02/15 03:49, , 40F
02/15 03:49, 40F
推
02/15 04:37, , 41F
02/15 04:37, 41F
→
02/15 04:38, , 42F
02/15 04:38, 42F
推
02/15 05:28, , 43F
02/15 05:28, 43F
→
02/15 05:29, , 44F
02/15 05:29, 44F
→
02/15 05:29, , 45F
02/15 05:29, 45F
→
02/15 05:29, , 46F
02/15 05:29, 46F
推
02/15 05:32, , 47F
02/15 05:32, 47F
→
02/15 05:32, , 48F
02/15 05:32, 48F
→
02/15 05:52, , 49F
02/15 05:52, 49F
噓
02/15 06:36, , 50F
02/15 06:36, 50F
→
02/15 07:42, , 51F
02/15 07:42, 51F
推
02/15 08:14, , 52F
02/15 08:14, 52F
推
02/15 09:05, , 53F
02/15 09:05, 53F
推
02/15 09:18, , 54F
02/15 09:18, 54F
→
02/15 09:55, , 55F
02/15 09:55, 55F
推
02/15 09:59, , 56F
02/15 09:59, 56F
噓
02/15 10:05, , 57F
02/15 10:05, 57F
推
02/15 10:09, , 58F
02/15 10:09, 58F
噓
02/15 10:32, , 59F
02/15 10:32, 59F
推
02/15 10:40, , 60F
02/15 10:40, 60F
推
02/15 10:46, , 61F
02/15 10:46, 61F
推
02/15 10:59, , 62F
02/15 10:59, 62F
→
02/15 10:59, , 63F
02/15 10:59, 63F
推
02/15 11:00, , 64F
02/15 11:00, 64F
→
02/15 11:02, , 65F
02/15 11:02, 65F
→
02/15 11:03, , 66F
02/15 11:03, 66F
推
02/15 11:13, , 67F
02/15 11:13, 67F
推
02/15 12:27, , 68F
02/15 12:27, 68F
→
02/15 12:29, , 69F
02/15 12:29, 69F
→
02/15 12:29, , 70F
02/15 12:29, 70F
推
02/15 12:52, , 71F
02/15 12:52, 71F
噓
02/15 14:48, , 72F
02/15 14:48, 72F
→
02/15 14:48, , 73F
02/15 14:48, 73F
→
02/15 14:48, , 74F
02/15 14:48, 74F
噓
02/15 14:53, , 75F
02/15 14:53, 75F
→
02/15 14:53, , 76F
02/15 14:53, 76F
→
02/15 15:44, , 77F
02/15 15:44, 77F
推
02/15 18:45, , 78F
02/15 18:45, 78F
→
02/15 18:45, , 79F
02/15 18:45, 79F
討論串 (同標題文章)