[外絮] Jatt對C9 Balls KR soloq評價推特合戰已回收
原編輯者: MadlyChemical
原Reddit串:https://goo.gl/7nWeHg
Jatt:
https://twitter.com/RiotJatt/status/643277527994101760
Huni: 375 LP Masters in 115 games
Balls: D2 84 LP in 192 games
There's more to life than solo Q, but this is a worrying trend for C9.
Huni: 115場就打上大師375分
Balls: 192場還卡鑽二
Soloq不代表全部,但這是C9的一個隱憂
Sneaky:
https://twitter.com/C9Sneaky/status/643278768753082368
@RiotJatt why are u picking on balls ? I'm pretty sure there's more than just
him in diamond 2.
https://twitter.com/C9Sneaky/status/643279209935212544
@RiotJatt bjergsen, turtle, aphro, xmithie
你為什麼要針對球球,我很肯定他絕對比鑽二還強
比爾森,龜龜,阿佛摸跟非常不幸也沒打很高阿
Jatt:
https://twitter.com/RiotJatt/status/643279379347279872
@C9Sneaky Not trying to pick on anyone, I feel like currently he's an
outlier. http://www.trackingthepros.com/bootcamp?hide=true
https://twitter.com/RiotJatt/status/643279606389207040
@C9Sneaky Balls has 80+ more games than anyone else in D2. It's not personal.
I hope to see C9 do well at worlds
https://twitter.com/RiotJatt/status/643280091389161472
@C9Sneaky Also Bjergsen, Turtle, Aphro, and xmithie have not demoted from D1
to D2 on multiple occasions.
我沒有針對誰,只是覺得目前他不在同一個等級上
我希望C9在世界賽上表現得很好,還有鼻爾森,龜龜,阿佛摸跟非常不幸
並沒有從鑽一掉到鑽二好幾次
sOAZ:
https://twitter.com/sOAZIZGOOD/status/643281207879270400
@RiotJatt how does this even matter ? darien and genja never played soloq in
their life. soloq is completely different than competitive
這到底有什麼關係?達理安跟蔗皇從來就沒有打過soloq,soloq跟比賽是完全不同的東西
SaintVicious:
https://twitter.com/LolStvicious/status/643281664194560000
@sOAZIZGOOD @RiotJatt alright Jatt ima draw the line here, questioning
someones solo q ranking is pretty stupid
好了,jatt,到這裡為止了,質疑一個人的soloq成績是非常蠢的
Hauntzer:
https://twitter.com/lolHauntzer/status/643282665227948032
@LolStvicious @sOAZIZGOOD @RiotJatt If soloq determined how well you did in
competitive then I'd be the worst top in lcs
如果soloq表示你在比賽會打得多好的話,我就會是LCS最差的選手了(GV上路)
Amazing:
https://twitter.com/Amazing_EU/status/643282767766155268
@RiotJatt @C9Sneaky Why do you even bring up soloQ rating in order to
estimate someone's skill? It just fuels potential shit coming his way
你為什麼要用soloq來評價一個人的技巧?這只是在引起觀眾戰balls而已。
Sheep:
https://twitter.com/C9Sheep/status/643284365154361345
@LolStvicious @sOAZIZGOOD @RiotJatt wolf has been master tier like 90% of
this season and he has a negative win rate on every support
EDIT: Format
EDIT 2: Added Haunzter and Amazing
EDIT 3: Added C9 Sheep
EDIT 4: Aaaand Jatt's Twitlonger is up
Calling out Balls for his solo Q performance was in bad form. I think there
is value in data, but a single data point doesn’t paint an accurate or fair
picture.
I’ve reached out to C9 and apologized, and I wish them the best as they
prepare for worlds.
Wolf這一季幾乎90%的時間都在大師,而他所有的角色勝率都不太好
用soloq的成績去說Ball的狀態不佳,我覺得資料有它的價值,但單一的資料不能準確
或公正的看出實際情況。
我跟C9接觸也致歉,而我希望他們在世界賽準備得很好。
EDIT 5:
Monte:
https://twitter.com/RNGMonteCristo/status/643356898016804864
I don't think @riotjatt did anything wrong accounting for all factors in his
discussion of Balls. Pros may not like it, but it's his job.
https://twitter.com/RNGMonteCristo/status/643357262539530240
In my opinion, Balls' professional play has been sub-par this year and it's
worth at least considering his solo queue performance.
https://twitter.com/RNGMonteCristo/status/643358088314097664
Pros will never like it when analysts discuss flaws in their play. Fact is,
however, not everyone can be the best.
https://twitter.com/RNGMonteCristo/status/643358992954228736
I think pros should spend less time arguing with analysts on Twitter and just
prove to us they're good at Worlds.
匯集所有因素去討論Ball,我不覺得這件事上Jatt有做錯什麼,只是職業選手不喜歡
,但這是Jatt的工作。
我是覺得Balls今年的職業表現低於水準,而這至少值得讓我們去考慮他的soloq表現
但職業選手絕對不會喜歡分析師談論他們的缺點,然而事實是
沒有任何人可以是完美的。
我覺得職業選手應該花少點時間在推特上戰分析師,然後在世界賽上證明自己。
EDIT 6: God these just keep coming, don't they...
FORG1VEN:
https://twitter.com/FORG1VENGRE/status/643358150196883456
@RiotJatt @MarcelFeldkamp @LolStvicious if soloq is not a good indicative of
a 'current' level of a player then we shouldnt play!!!
如果Soloq不是一個良好的指標去衡量一個選手的目前水準,那我們都不該打soloq!
Dexter:
https://twitter.com/MarcelFeldkamp/status/643303962532257792
@RiotJatt Presenting the data itself was fine, just the phrasing you used
seemed to be completely off. Analysing is your job afterall.
https://twitter.com/MarcelFeldkamp/status/643305348158365700
@RiotJatt Presenting the data itself was fine, just the phrasing you used
seemed to be completely off. Analysing is your job afterall.
https://twitter.com/MarcelFeldkamp/status/643305348158365700
@LolStvicious @RiotJatt Soloqueue has been completely shit anyways for 2
straight seasons. I dont give a fuck anymore if botlane goes 0-20
呈現資料是沒問題的,只是你引申的東西完全離題了,不過畢竟分析是你的工作
soloq在這兩季以來完全就只是屎罷了,當下路爆線時我完全不在乎了。
@LolStvicious @RiotJatt Soloqueue in both NA and EU is a complete clown
fiesta, nothing to add
NA和EU的soloq只是鬧劇罷了,沒什麼好講的
Febiven: (lol)
https://twitter.com/FnaticFebiven/status/643375848490295296
soloq is just luck zzzzzzz
soloq就是狗屎運啦 zzzzzzz
-------------------------持續更新中
起因是Jatt在抽籤評論說Balls卡鑽二
之後整個論壇延燒,後來變成推特合戰
原本想翻一些下面reddit鄉民回應,不過好像該買飯了..XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.230.147.167
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1442226165.A.40C.html
補漏翻,出門囉
推
09/14 18:24, , 1F
09/14 18:24, 1F
推
09/14 18:24, , 2F
09/14 18:24, 2F
→
09/14 18:26, , 3F
09/14 18:26, 3F
推
09/14 18:26, , 4F
09/14 18:26, 4F
推
09/14 18:27, , 5F
09/14 18:27, 5F
推
09/14 18:27, , 6F
09/14 18:27, 6F
推
09/14 18:28, , 7F
09/14 18:28, 7F
推
09/14 18:28, , 8F
09/14 18:28, 8F
推
09/14 18:29, , 9F
09/14 18:29, 9F
推
09/14 18:30, , 10F
09/14 18:30, 10F
推
09/14 18:31, , 11F
09/14 18:31, 11F
推
09/14 18:31, , 12F
09/14 18:31, 12F
推
09/14 18:31, , 13F
09/14 18:31, 13F
→
09/14 18:32, , 14F
09/14 18:32, 14F
→
09/14 18:32, , 15F
09/14 18:32, 15F
推
09/14 18:33, , 16F
09/14 18:33, 16F
推
09/14 18:35, , 17F
09/14 18:35, 17F
推
09/14 18:35, , 18F
09/14 18:35, 18F
→
09/14 18:35, , 19F
09/14 18:35, 19F
推
09/14 18:35, , 20F
09/14 18:35, 20F
推
09/14 18:37, , 21F
09/14 18:37, 21F
→
09/14 18:37, , 22F
09/14 18:37, 22F
推
09/14 18:38, , 23F
09/14 18:38, 23F
推
09/14 18:39, , 24F
09/14 18:39, 24F
推
09/14 18:39, , 25F
09/14 18:39, 25F
→
09/14 18:39, , 26F
09/14 18:39, 26F
推
09/14 18:39, , 27F
09/14 18:39, 27F
推
09/14 18:40, , 28F
09/14 18:40, 28F
噓
09/14 18:40, , 29F
09/14 18:40, 29F
→
09/14 18:40, , 30F
09/14 18:40, 30F
推
09/14 18:40, , 31F
09/14 18:40, 31F
推
09/14 18:40, , 32F
09/14 18:40, 32F
推
09/14 18:40, , 33F
09/14 18:40, 33F
推
09/14 18:40, , 34F
09/14 18:40, 34F
推
09/14 18:41, , 35F
09/14 18:41, 35F
→
09/14 18:41, , 36F
09/14 18:41, 36F
→
09/14 18:42, , 37F
09/14 18:42, 37F
推
09/14 18:42, , 38F
09/14 18:42, 38F
還有 164 則推文
還有 2 段內文
推
09/14 20:03, , 203F
09/14 20:03, 203F
→
09/14 20:09, , 204F
09/14 20:09, 204F
→
09/14 20:10, , 205F
09/14 20:10, 205F
推
09/14 20:10, , 206F
09/14 20:10, 206F
推
09/14 20:12, , 207F
09/14 20:12, 207F
推
09/14 20:13, , 208F
09/14 20:13, 208F
推
09/14 20:20, , 209F
09/14 20:20, 209F
→
09/14 20:21, , 210F
09/14 20:21, 210F
推
09/14 20:21, , 211F
09/14 20:21, 211F
→
09/14 20:22, , 212F
09/14 20:22, 212F
→
09/14 20:23, , 213F
09/14 20:23, 213F
→
09/14 20:23, , 214F
09/14 20:23, 214F
推
09/14 20:30, , 215F
09/14 20:30, 215F
推
09/14 20:31, , 216F
09/14 20:31, 216F
→
09/14 20:31, , 217F
09/14 20:31, 217F
→
09/14 20:31, , 218F
09/14 20:31, 218F
推
09/14 20:36, , 219F
09/14 20:36, 219F
→
09/14 20:36, , 220F
09/14 20:36, 220F
推
09/14 20:42, , 221F
09/14 20:42, 221F
→
09/14 20:49, , 222F
09/14 20:49, 222F
→
09/14 20:53, , 223F
09/14 20:53, 223F
→
09/14 21:17, , 224F
09/14 21:17, 224F
→
09/14 21:17, , 225F
09/14 21:17, 225F
→
09/14 21:18, , 226F
09/14 21:18, 226F
→
09/14 21:18, , 227F
09/14 21:18, 227F
推
09/14 21:18, , 228F
09/14 21:18, 228F
→
09/14 21:19, , 229F
09/14 21:19, 229F
推
09/14 21:32, , 230F
09/14 21:32, 230F
→
09/14 21:58, , 231F
09/14 21:58, 231F
→
09/14 21:58, , 232F
09/14 21:58, 232F
→
09/14 21:58, , 233F
09/14 21:58, 233F
→
09/14 21:59, , 234F
09/14 21:59, 234F
→
09/14 22:00, , 235F
09/14 22:00, 235F
→
09/14 22:00, , 236F
09/14 22:00, 236F
推
09/14 22:20, , 237F
09/14 22:20, 237F
→
09/14 22:23, , 238F
09/14 22:23, 238F
推
09/14 22:39, , 239F
09/14 22:39, 239F
→
09/14 22:42, , 240F
09/14 22:42, 240F
推
09/15 14:15, , 241F
09/15 14:15, 241F
噓
09/21 10:05, , 242F
09/21 10:05, 242F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):