Re: [問題] 住牛排是有效的戰術嗎?消失
※ 引述《polymaker (..)》之銘言:
: 住牛排有用嗎?當然沒用啊!
: 身為一位職業選手,會這麼不知長進,而且沒有羞恥心嗎?
: 人家都嗆聲了,只靠那一千零一招,就要屌打你一千零一百次,
: 你還真以為能每次得手喔?哪有這麼簡單的事情。
: 放眼整個台灣電競圈,可以連續兩年被同一套戰術玩爆的選手,
: 我看也只有他而已了......
: ※ 引述《s333 (33)》之銘言:
: : 從HKE AHQ到TPA,
: : 每一隊都使用過同一個戰術-住牛排
: : 好幾次看到牛排6min cs不到10
: : 真的是慘的不能再慘,
: : 西門受訪時被問到怎麽對付yoe
: : 就很阿莎力的說住牛排呀,
: : 而yoe並沒有被住牛排戰術打倒,
: : 成功拿下IEM出國權,
: : 假使現在回過頭來看,住牛排這個方法是個有效的戰術嗎?
為什麼每次AHQ輸了就要怪西門拉
這次AHQ會輸明明其他人的問題比較大
西門吃完3 ban而且表現的中規中矩,
結果到最後為何還是變成西門的問題?
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 49.214.74.68
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1422771665.A.7B4.html
推
02/01 14:21, , 1F
02/01 14:21, 1F
→
02/01 14:24, , 2F
02/01 14:24, 2F
推
02/01 14:24, , 3F
02/01 14:24, 3F
推
02/01 14:25, , 4F
02/01 14:25, 4F
→
02/01 14:25, , 5F
02/01 14:25, 5F
→
02/01 14:25, , 6F
02/01 14:25, 6F
→
02/01 14:26, , 7F
02/01 14:26, 7F
推
02/01 14:26, , 8F
02/01 14:26, 8F
→
02/01 14:27, , 9F
02/01 14:27, 9F
→
02/01 14:28, , 10F
02/01 14:28, 10F
推
02/01 14:28, , 11F
02/01 14:28, 11F
推
02/01 14:28, , 12F
02/01 14:28, 12F
噓
02/01 14:29, , 13F
02/01 14:29, 13F
推
02/01 14:29, , 14F
02/01 14:29, 14F
噓
02/01 14:29, , 15F
02/01 14:29, 15F
→
02/01 14:29, , 16F
02/01 14:29, 16F
→
02/01 14:29, , 17F
02/01 14:29, 17F
→
02/01 14:29, , 18F
02/01 14:29, 18F
→
02/01 14:30, , 19F
02/01 14:30, 19F
推
02/01 14:32, , 20F
02/01 14:32, 20F
推
02/01 14:32, , 21F
02/01 14:32, 21F
→
02/01 14:32, , 22F
02/01 14:32, 22F
推
02/01 14:33, , 23F
02/01 14:33, 23F
噓
02/01 14:35, , 24F
02/01 14:35, 24F
推
02/01 14:38, , 25F
02/01 14:38, 25F
推
02/01 14:40, , 26F
02/01 14:40, 26F
推
02/01 14:42, , 27F
02/01 14:42, 27F
噓
02/01 14:43, , 28F
02/01 14:43, 28F
推
02/01 14:49, , 29F
02/01 14:49, 29F
噓
02/01 14:49, , 30F
02/01 14:49, 30F
→
02/01 14:49, , 31F
02/01 14:49, 31F
→
02/01 14:49, , 32F
02/01 14:49, 32F
推
02/01 14:50, , 33F
02/01 14:50, 33F
→
02/01 14:51, , 34F
02/01 14:51, 34F
推
02/01 14:51, , 35F
02/01 14:51, 35F
推
02/01 14:55, , 36F
02/01 14:55, 36F
→
02/01 14:58, , 37F
02/01 14:58, 37F
→
02/01 14:59, , 38F
02/01 14:59, 38F
→
02/01 14:59, , 39F
02/01 14:59, 39F
還有 59 則推文
→
02/01 15:30, , 99F
02/01 15:30, 99F
→
02/01 15:30, , 100F
02/01 15:30, 100F
→
02/01 15:30, , 101F
02/01 15:30, 101F
→
02/01 15:30, , 102F
02/01 15:30, 102F
→
02/01 15:31, , 103F
02/01 15:31, 103F
→
02/01 15:31, , 104F
02/01 15:31, 104F
→
02/01 15:32, , 105F
02/01 15:32, 105F
推
02/01 15:33, , 106F
02/01 15:33, 106F
推
02/01 15:33, , 107F
02/01 15:33, 107F
推
02/01 15:33, , 108F
02/01 15:33, 108F
→
02/01 15:34, , 109F
02/01 15:34, 109F
→
02/01 15:34, , 110F
02/01 15:34, 110F
推
02/01 15:34, , 111F
02/01 15:34, 111F
→
02/01 15:34, , 112F
02/01 15:34, 112F
推
02/01 15:35, , 113F
02/01 15:35, 113F
推
02/01 15:35, , 114F
02/01 15:35, 114F
→
02/01 15:35, , 115F
02/01 15:35, 115F
推
02/01 15:36, , 116F
02/01 15:36, 116F
推
02/01 15:37, , 117F
02/01 15:37, 117F
→
02/01 15:38, , 118F
02/01 15:38, 118F
噓
02/01 15:49, , 119F
02/01 15:49, 119F
噓
02/01 15:56, , 120F
02/01 15:56, 120F
→
02/01 15:58, , 121F
02/01 15:58, 121F
→
02/01 15:59, , 122F
02/01 15:59, 122F
→
02/01 16:00, , 123F
02/01 16:00, 123F
噓
02/01 16:00, , 124F
02/01 16:00, 124F
→
02/01 16:01, , 125F
02/01 16:01, 125F
→
02/01 16:02, , 126F
02/01 16:02, 126F
→
02/01 16:19, , 127F
02/01 16:19, 127F
噓
02/01 16:20, , 128F
02/01 16:20, 128F
→
02/01 16:21, , 129F
02/01 16:21, 129F
→
02/01 16:23, , 130F
02/01 16:23, 130F
噓
02/01 16:27, , 131F
02/01 16:27, 131F
→
02/01 16:48, , 132F
02/01 16:48, 132F
→
02/01 16:49, , 133F
02/01 16:49, 133F
推
02/01 18:17, , 134F
02/01 18:17, 134F
噓
02/01 20:17, , 135F
02/01 20:17, 135F
推
02/01 22:14, , 136F
02/01 22:14, 136F
→
02/01 22:14, , 137F
02/01 22:14, 137F
→
02/01 22:14, , 138F
02/01 22:14, 138F
討論串 (同標題文章)