[問題] 兩隊經濟差距為何要用%來算?消失
如題
TPA vs YoeFW
吉祥的播報一直用"兩隊差距達到25%""10%" etc
這樣有比較好懂嗎?
至少從以前看到現在
差距多少都是直接講差幾k
清楚好懂
球z還有教學:直接換算成巨人腰帶
講%數的差距是從何時開始流行?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.38.12.91
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1417182385.A.A0A.html
推
11/28 21:47, , 1F
11/28 21:47, 1F
→
11/28 21:47, , 2F
11/28 21:47, 2F
→
11/28 21:47, , 3F
11/28 21:47, 3F
→
11/28 21:47, , 4F
11/28 21:47, 4F
推
11/28 21:48, , 5F
11/28 21:48, 5F
推
11/28 21:48, , 6F
11/28 21:48, 6F
推
11/28 21:48, , 7F
11/28 21:48, 7F
推
11/28 21:48, , 8F
11/28 21:48, 8F
推
11/28 21:48, , 9F
11/28 21:48, 9F
推
11/28 21:48, , 10F
11/28 21:48, 10F
那假設藍方40k 紫方30k 這樣差距幾%?
※ 編輯: spin5566 (114.38.12.91), 11/28/2014 21:50:01
→
11/28 21:49, , 11F
11/28 21:49, 11F
→
11/28 21:49, , 12F
11/28 21:49, 12F
→
11/28 21:50, , 13F
11/28 21:50, 13F
→
11/28 21:50, , 14F
11/28 21:50, 14F
噓
11/28 21:51, , 15F
11/28 21:51, 15F
→
11/28 21:51, , 16F
11/28 21:51, 16F
推
11/28 21:51, , 17F
11/28 21:51, 17F
→
11/28 21:51, , 18F
11/28 21:51, 18F
→
11/28 21:51, , 19F
11/28 21:51, 19F
噓
11/28 21:51, , 20F
11/28 21:51, 20F
噓
11/28 21:55, , 21F
11/28 21:55, 21F
噓
11/28 21:55, , 22F
11/28 21:55, 22F
噓
11/28 21:56, , 23F
11/28 21:56, 23F
→
11/28 21:56, , 24F
11/28 21:56, 24F
噓
11/28 21:57, , 25F
11/28 21:57, 25F
→
11/28 21:57, , 26F
11/28 21:57, 26F
噓
11/28 21:58, , 27F
11/28 21:58, 27F
噓
11/28 21:58, , 28F
11/28 21:58, 28F
噓
11/28 21:59, , 29F
11/28 21:59, 29F
推
11/28 22:06, , 30F
11/28 22:06, 30F
推
11/28 22:15, , 31F
11/28 22:15, 31F
噓
11/28 22:15, , 32F
11/28 22:15, 32F
→
11/28 22:16, , 33F
11/28 22:16, 33F
哇 一堆銅學是在噓幾點的
40k跟30k 你說差33% 換個算法就是25%了
這樣你覺得觀眾有比較好懂?
真是銅言銅語
※ 編輯: spin5566 (114.38.12.91), 11/28/2014 22:27:51
噓
11/28 22:29, , 34F
11/28 22:29, 34F
噓
11/28 22:29, , 35F
11/28 22:29, 35F
噓
11/28 22:36, , 36F
11/28 22:36, 36F
噓
11/28 22:36, , 37F
11/28 22:36, 37F
噓
11/28 22:37, , 38F
11/28 22:37, 38F
噓
11/28 22:50, , 39F
11/28 22:50, 39F
推
11/28 23:43, , 40F
11/28 23:43, 40F
→
11/28 23:44, , 41F
11/28 23:44, 41F
→
11/28 23:45, , 42F
11/28 23:45, 42F
推
11/28 23:51, , 43F
11/28 23:51, 43F
推
11/29 00:04, , 44F
11/29 00:04, 44F
→
11/29 00:05, , 45F
11/29 00:05, 45F
噓
11/29 00:24, , 46F
11/29 00:24, 46F
噓
11/29 01:21, , 47F
11/29 01:21, 47F
噓
11/29 01:27, , 48F
11/29 01:27, 48F
噓
11/29 02:27, , 49F
11/29 02:27, 49F
噓
11/29 03:23, , 50F
11/29 03:23, 50F
→
11/29 03:23, , 51F
11/29 03:23, 51F
推
11/29 04:38, , 52F
11/29 04:38, 52F
推
11/29 20:33, , 53F
11/29 20:33, 53F
噓
11/29 20:40, , 54F
11/29 20:40, 54F
→
11/30 11:25, , 55F
11/30 11:25, 55F
噓
11/30 16:18, , 56F
11/30 16:18, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):