[問題] 全盛時期的mata還是madlife比較強？消失
目前史上比較多人公認的sup之神有兩位，
一位是輔助公子打下路的madlife,DL最愛的sup，
S4找他去測試sup裝，結果全場錢最多，逼得riot削弱輔助跳錢裝，
身為sup卻常常享受對面兩ban甚至3ban的高規格待遇，
巔峰時期的madlife,團戰的時候總能在各種不可思議的角度抓到對手，
對於閃現和大招的運用，madlife已經是這個遊戲的極致，
他總是能合理的運用所有的技能配合釋放間隙中的普通攻擊打出最多的傷害
也是唯一一位在ogn殺到godlike的輔助
mata就不多說了，最近大家才剛看完S4,
應該記憶猶深，深不見底的口袋，強悍的地圖控制，
對面刺客角的噩夢，遊走的時機也是精妙無比
不知道這兩位以巔峰時期論的話，
大家覺得madlife還是mata比較強?
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.80.124.8
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1414713830.A.8F7.html
推
10/31 08:07, , 1F
10/31 08:07, 1F
→
10/31 08:08, , 2F
10/31 08:08, 2F
→
10/31 08:08, , 3F
10/31 08:08, 3F
→
10/31 08:09, , 4F
10/31 08:09, 4F
推
10/31 08:10, , 5F
10/31 08:10, 5F
推
10/31 08:10, , 6F
10/31 08:10, 6F
→
10/31 08:10, , 7F
10/31 08:10, 7F
→
10/31 08:12, , 8F
10/31 08:12, 8F
→
10/31 08:12, , 9F
10/31 08:12, 9F
推
10/31 08:14, , 10F
10/31 08:14, 10F
推
10/31 08:20, , 11F
10/31 08:20, 11F
推
10/31 08:22, , 12F
10/31 08:22, 12F
推
10/31 08:30, , 13F
10/31 08:30, 13F
推
10/31 08:30, , 14F
10/31 08:30, 14F
推
10/31 08:31, , 15F
10/31 08:31, 15F
→
10/31 08:31, , 16F
10/31 08:31, 16F
推
10/31 08:34, , 17F
10/31 08:34, 17F
推
10/31 08:36, , 18F
10/31 08:36, 18F
推
10/31 08:40, , 19F
10/31 08:40, 19F
推
10/31 08:43, , 20F
10/31 08:43, 20F
推
10/31 08:45, , 21F
10/31 08:45, 21F
→
10/31 08:46, , 22F
10/31 08:46, 22F
→
10/31 08:46, , 23F
10/31 08:46, 23F
→
10/31 08:47, , 24F
10/31 08:47, 24F
推
10/31 08:49, , 25F
10/31 08:49, 25F
推
10/31 08:49, , 26F
10/31 08:49, 26F
推
10/31 08:55, , 27F
10/31 08:55, 27F
推
10/31 09:07, , 28F
10/31 09:07, 28F
推
10/31 09:07, , 29F
10/31 09:07, 29F
推
10/31 09:08, , 30F
10/31 09:08, 30F
推
10/31 09:12, , 31F
10/31 09:12, 31F
→
10/31 09:22, , 32F
10/31 09:22, 32F
→
10/31 09:37, , 33F
10/31 09:37, 33F
推
10/31 09:38, , 34F
10/31 09:38, 34F
推
10/31 09:48, , 35F
10/31 09:48, 35F
噓
10/31 10:18, , 36F
10/31 10:18, 36F
推
10/31 10:26, , 37F
10/31 10:26, 37F
噓
10/31 10:29, , 38F
10/31 10:29, 38F
推
10/31 10:37, , 39F
10/31 10:37, 39F
推
10/31 10:43, , 40F
10/31 10:43, 40F
推
10/31 10:44, , 41F
10/31 10:44, 41F
推
10/31 10:47, , 42F
10/31 10:47, 42F
推
10/31 11:02, , 43F
10/31 11:02, 43F
推
10/31 11:15, , 44F
10/31 11:15, 44F
推
10/31 11:21, , 45F
10/31 11:21, 45F
推
10/31 11:22, , 46F
10/31 11:22, 46F
推
10/31 11:23, , 47F
10/31 11:23, 47F
推
10/31 11:31, , 48F
10/31 11:31, 48F
推
10/31 11:33, , 49F
10/31 11:33, 49F
→
10/31 11:39, , 50F
10/31 11:39, 50F
推
10/31 11:46, , 51F
10/31 11:46, 51F
推
10/31 11:58, , 52F
10/31 11:58, 52F
推
10/31 12:09, , 53F
10/31 12:09, 53F
推
10/31 12:51, , 54F
10/31 12:51, 54F
→
10/31 12:51, , 55F
10/31 12:51, 55F
推
10/31 12:55, , 56F
10/31 12:55, 56F
推
10/31 13:11, , 57F
10/31 13:11, 57F
→
10/31 14:28, , 58F
10/31 14:28, 58F
推
10/31 14:38, , 59F
10/31 14:38, 59F
推
10/31 16:42, , 60F
10/31 16:42, 60F
推
10/31 16:56, , 61F
10/31 16:56, 61F
推
10/31 19:18, , 62F
10/31 19:18, 62F
推
11/01 01:16, , 63F
11/01 01:16, 63F
推
11/04 17:09, , 64F
11/04 17:09, 64F
推
11/11 05:41, , 65F
11/11 05:41, 65F
→
11/11 05:42, , 66F
11/11 05:42, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇)：