Re: [情報] 台中東海夜市 HA~NI服飾明天起特價三天
我需要大家來評評理!關於這篇文章原PO的惡劣行為!
當初.我看到這篇文章PO文當時.
我主觀認定這是一篇廣告文.
於是我在該篇文章當中噓文.說: 真是夠了!!
但是事後發現.原PO卻將我的噓文給刪除.
這樣掩耳盜鈴的做法實在讓人生氣!!!
於是我再次噓文.並說廣告文還這麼理直氣壯.幹嘛刪除我的噓文.
結果換來原PO寄站內信恐嚇.
叫我把我家地址給她.以下是信件內容:
"我會寄存證信函給你
你可以不用任何回應
不過你要為了你的文字負責!!
你若不回應我會要求台大PTT 給我你的基本資料
這樣到時會公諸於世 看你有多過份"
並且在該篇文章中.繼續刪除我的發言.
留下:你可以不用回應! 你的文字公然侮辱 我已經備份
第一.我覺得ptt可以推噓文就代表我能使用這些功能.
憑什麼要刪除我的噓文.畢竟她就是一篇廣告文!!!
第二.在事後刪除我的留言.還寄站內信說要我的地址.
要寄存證信函給我.雖然說存證信函並沒有甚麼效力.
但是這樣的行為已經嚴重影響到我的心情.
畢竟在我主觀認知中.這就是一篇廣告文!!!!
因此我想求各位版友來評斷.這樣掩耳盜鈴刪除人的留言是對的嗎?
況且事後還說要寄存證信函.我覺得她的行為已經相當超過了!!!
儘管我已經寄信給兩位版主了...
但希望大家不要謾罵.並且理性看待這件事情.
以免也被寄"存證信函"
版友 ryukyu
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.138.107.184
※ 編輯: ryukyu 來自: 220.138.107.184 (11/13 17:16)
推
11/13 17:20, , 1F
11/13 17:20, 1F
推
11/13 17:22, , 2F
11/13 17:22, 2F
推
11/13 17:22, , 3F
11/13 17:22, 3F
推
11/13 17:22, , 4F
11/13 17:22, 4F
→
11/13 17:23, , 5F
11/13 17:23, 5F
→
11/13 17:23, , 6F
11/13 17:23, 6F
→
11/13 17:24, , 7F
11/13 17:24, 7F
→
11/13 17:25, , 8F
11/13 17:25, 8F
→
11/13 17:25, , 9F
11/13 17:25, 9F
→
11/13 17:34, , 10F
11/13 17:34, 10F
推
11/13 17:35, , 11F
11/13 17:35, 11F
→
11/13 17:35, , 12F
11/13 17:35, 12F
→
11/13 17:35, , 13F
11/13 17:35, 13F
→
11/13 17:36, , 14F
11/13 17:36, 14F
→
11/13 17:36, , 15F
11/13 17:36, 15F
→
11/13 17:37, , 16F
11/13 17:37, 16F
推
11/13 18:11, , 17F
11/13 18:11, 17F
→
11/13 18:11, , 18F
11/13 18:11, 18F
→
11/13 18:12, , 19F
11/13 18:12, 19F
→
11/13 18:13, , 20F
11/13 18:13, 20F
→
11/13 18:14, , 21F
11/13 18:14, 21F
→
11/13 18:14, , 22F
11/13 18:14, 22F
推
11/13 18:33, , 23F
11/13 18:33, 23F
→
11/13 18:34, , 24F
11/13 18:34, 24F
→
11/13 18:35, , 25F
11/13 18:35, 25F
→
11/13 18:35, , 26F
11/13 18:35, 26F
→
11/13 18:36, , 27F
11/13 18:36, 27F
→
11/13 18:37, , 28F
11/13 18:37, 28F
推
11/13 18:47, , 29F
11/13 18:47, 29F
推
11/13 18:51, , 30F
11/13 18:51, 30F
推
11/13 18:57, , 31F
11/13 18:57, 31F
推
11/13 19:04, , 32F
11/13 19:04, 32F
推
11/13 19:06, , 33F
11/13 19:06, 33F
→
11/13 19:10, , 34F
11/13 19:10, 34F
→
11/13 19:12, , 35F
11/13 19:12, 35F
→
11/13 19:13, , 36F
11/13 19:13, 36F
→
11/13 19:13, , 37F
11/13 19:13, 37F
→
11/13 19:14, , 38F
11/13 19:14, 38F
推
11/13 19:15, , 39F
11/13 19:15, 39F
→
11/13 19:16, , 40F
11/13 19:16, 40F
→
11/13 19:18, , 41F
11/13 19:18, 41F
→
11/13 19:19, , 42F
11/13 19:19, 42F
→
11/13 19:21, , 43F
11/13 19:21, 43F
→
11/13 19:22, , 44F
11/13 19:22, 44F
→
11/13 19:22, , 45F
11/13 19:22, 45F
→
11/13 19:23, , 46F
11/13 19:23, 46F
→
11/13 19:24, , 47F
11/13 19:24, 47F
→
11/13 19:24, , 48F
11/13 19:24, 48F
→
11/13 19:25, , 49F
11/13 19:25, 49F
→
11/13 19:25, , 50F
11/13 19:25, 50F
→
11/13 19:25, , 51F
11/13 19:25, 51F
→
11/13 19:26, , 52F
11/13 19:26, 52F
→
11/13 19:27, , 53F
11/13 19:27, 53F
→
11/13 19:28, , 54F
11/13 19:28, 54F
→
11/13 19:30, , 55F
11/13 19:30, 55F
→
11/13 19:30, , 56F
11/13 19:30, 56F
→
11/13 19:31, , 57F
11/13 19:31, 57F
→
11/13 19:32, , 58F
11/13 19:32, 58F
→
11/13 19:33, , 59F
11/13 19:33, 59F
→
11/13 19:33, , 60F
11/13 19:33, 60F
→
11/13 19:34, , 61F
11/13 19:34, 61F
→
11/13 19:35, , 62F
11/13 19:35, 62F
→
11/13 19:36, , 63F
11/13 19:36, 63F
→
11/13 19:37, , 64F
11/13 19:37, 64F
→
11/13 19:38, , 65F
11/13 19:38, 65F
→
11/13 19:38, , 66F
11/13 19:38, 66F
推
11/13 19:41, , 67F
11/13 19:41, 67F
→
11/13 19:41, , 68F
11/13 19:41, 68F
→
11/13 19:42, , 69F
11/13 19:42, 69F
→
11/13 19:43, , 70F
11/13 19:43, 70F
推
11/13 19:44, , 71F
11/13 19:44, 71F
→
11/13 19:55, , 72F
11/13 19:55, 72F
噓
11/13 19:58, , 73F
11/13 19:58, 73F
→
11/13 19:59, , 74F
11/13 19:59, 74F
→
11/13 20:00, , 75F
11/13 20:00, 75F
推
11/13 21:06, , 76F
11/13 21:06, 76F
推
11/13 21:30, , 77F
11/13 21:30, 77F
推
11/14 00:50, , 78F
11/14 00:50, 78F
→
11/14 00:51, , 79F
11/14 00:51, 79F
→
11/14 00:51, , 80F
11/14 00:51, 80F
→
11/14 00:51, , 81F
11/14 00:51, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):