[外電] 《Philly.com》史上最佳五人

看板LeBronJames作者Paraguay (巴拉圭)時間11年前 (2013/06/18 14:26)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/1

※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1HlhN_f0 ] 作者: kenny1300175 (蘇湖) 看板: NBA 標題: [外絮] 《Philly.com》史上最佳五人時間: Mon Jun 17 15:08:45 2013 The best NBA players of all time By Ed Rendell Posted: Saturday, June 15, 2013, 2:22 AM 先給名單... PG： Magic Johnson SG： Michael Jordan SF： LeBron James PF： Tim Duncan C： Wilt Chamberlain 以下為評選原因... Center: The competition boiled down to Chamberlain, Russell, Kareem Abdul Jabbar and O'Neal. It was awfully hard to choose. You could make a case for all four of them. Jabbar had a great field goal percentage at 56 percent, shot well from the line, scored almost 25 points per game and won six championships. O'Neal was a dominant defender and a points/rebounds machine. He shot an even better 58 predent from the field. But in the end, the choice came down to Russell vs. Chamberlain. Russell averaged 15 points per game, whereas Wilt averaged an incredible 30.1 points per game. Both claimed more than 22 rebounds a game. The advantage shifts to Russell when you consider he led his team to 11 championships, while Wilt won only two. But in the end, Wilt wins my vote because he was a very good defender and perhaps the most incredible offensive force ever to play the game. Just for example take the 1961-1962 season when Wilt averaged 50.4 points per game - no one has ever come close to those figures. 中鋒：在這位置上的人選有張伯倫、Bill Russell、Jabbar、O'Neal，這真的很難選。他們四個都有入選的理由。 Jabbar 生涯FG%高達56%，場均25分，6個總冠軍。O'Neal在攻防兩端都具統治力，生涯FG%更是達58%，但最終還是必須得在張伯倫及 Russell 間做出選擇。 Russell 場均得分只有15分，張伯倫則高達30.1分，兩人場均都超過22籃板。 Russell 帶領球隊拿下11個冠軍，張伯倫只有2個冠軍。最終我還是選了張伯倫，因為他是個非凡的防守者及在比賽中無與倫比的攻擊力。舉例，1961-62球季，張伯倫場均拿下50.4分，前無古人。 Power forward: I considered four players in making my selection here - Elvin Hayes, Karl Malone, Moses Malone and Tim Duncan. Again, all had great numbers and were pretty equal in rebounds and assists, but in the end, it was a pretty easy choice to go along with my friend Hal and select Tim Duncan. He won the statistical war by virtue of having already blocked 2,652 shots, which is almost 900 more than any of the other three. But even more important, his teams have won four championships. Some he won with the help of another great big man, David Robinson, and some he won without any dominant center, and we may well be watching him win his fifth. 大前鋒：這位置上有Elvin Hayes, Karl Malone, Moses Malone, Tim Duncan 等人選。這些人都有著大量的得分+籃板+助攻。但最終我選了 Duncan。 TD 的火鍋已經達到2652個，比其他三人都多出大約900個，更重要的是， Duncan的球隊已經得到4個總冠軍，現在大家可能會看到他贏下第5個總冠軍。 Small forward: This was the cast that had the most great players. Players such as George Gervin, Billy Cunningham, John Havlicek and Rick Barry didn't even make the final group. There were four contenders, our very own Charles Barkley and Erving, Bird and James. Doctor J was the first NBA player to play above the rim, and he changed the game forever. Bird was the consummate team player who did everything well. Charles was a fine scorer and an incredible rebounder considering his 6-4 height. But LeBron was the clear choice here. Not only has he scored more points by far than any of the other three, but no one can compete with his rebound and assist total, which he has accomplished in only 10 seasons! But the thing that distinguishes him the most from anyone else is his defense. LeBron is without a doubt the most dominant non-center defensive player in NBA history. 小前鋒：我考慮過 George Gervin, Billy Cunningham, John Havlicek 和 Rick Barry 等候選人，但最終都沒進入這名單。最後剩下 Barkley + J博士 + 大鳥 + LBJ 等四人在競爭。 J博士是第一個在籃框上打球的人，改變了比賽的型態。大鳥是一個完美的團隊球員各方面都出色。 Barkley 考慮到他的身高，一個不錯的得分好手及籃板怪物。但最終我選了 LBJ，LBJ 的得分比其他三個人要多，且籃板和助攻沒人能與他抗衡。LBJ 最與眾不同的是他的防守，毫無疑問，他是NBA歷史上非中鋒位置最具統治力的防守球員。 Shooting guard: There are only three contenders for this category- the great Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant and Jerry West. Surprisingly, West stacked up fairly well statically. He averaged 27 points, 5.8 rebounds and 6.7 assists. Kobe was 25.5, 5.3 and 4.8, respectively. And although Michael scored more points, 30.1 points per game, West was close in rebounds and surprisingly had more assists. When you realize that West scored his points without the benefit of the three-point shot (at which he would have been unbelievable) his stats are even more impressive. But he won only one championship as opposed to Jordan's six and Kobe's five. And wasn't anywhere close to Kobe and Michael as a defender. Statistically, Kobe and Michael are very close and in some ways it's hard to distinguish, but Michael may have been the best defending guard in the history of the NBA, andthe best clutch performer so he wins. 得分後衛：這位置上只有三個人選-- Jordan、Kobe、West。儘管 West 場均有27分5.8籃板6.7助攻，Kobe 場均 25.5分5.3籃板4.8助攻， Jordan 場均可拿下 30.1分，但助攻不及 West，不過考慮到 West 的年代尚未統計三分球，你會對他的數據印象更深刻。但 West 只有一個冠軍，Jordan 有6個， Kobe 有5個，某些方面來說，Kobe 和 Jordan 是非常接近的，但 Jordan 可能是歷史上最好的防守後衛，而且投關鍵球的能力更為出色。 Point guard: In the end, there were four candidates - John Stockton, Bob Cousy, Oscar Robertson and Magic Johnson. All were great distributors, and Stockton, surprisingly, was the best long-range shooter in the lot, shooting 38 percent from three-point range, (though, to be fair, Oscar did not play in the three-point era). I had to eliminate Cousy because he shot only shot 37.5 percent from the field and the championships he won were in part attributable to an incredible supporting cast. Stockton did not score anywhere close to the remaining two. So it was Oscar vs. Magic. Oscar scored six points per game more (without the benefit of three-point line), but was similar to Magic in rebounds and slightly behind in assists. The deciding factors were, again, defense and championships. Oscar won only one title while Magic won five. Oscar was named league MVP once, and Magic earned the award three times. And though Oscar was a good defender, Magic was a great one. Magic's versatility was also key. He could play all five positions on the court (Sixers fans will remember when Jabbar got hurt and he played center and killed us). So in a very close one, Magic is my pick. 控球後衛：4個候選人---老史、Cousy、大O、魔術。他們都是偉大的助攻者，老史有38%的三分命中率是個很好的長射手。但我必須先把 Cousy 從名單出去除，因為他的命中率只有 37.5%，當中老史的得分不及大O及魔術，所以最終我只能在大O及魔術中抉擇。大O場均得分比魔術多六分，籃板差不多，助攻少一點。最終決定性因素在於防守及冠軍。大O拿下1冠，魔術5冠，大O拿了1次MVP，魔術拿了3次。兩人都是很好的防守者，但魔術的多功能性成了決定因素。在場上魔術能勝任所有位置。 (七六人球迷還記得 Jabbar 受傷，魔術代打那次吧？) 最終我還是選了魔術。 http://ppt.cc/pWch ...... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.167.119.101

推

jyekid

06/17 15:09, , 1^F

06/17 15:09, 1^F

→

noahlin

06/17 15:10, , 2^F

06/17 15:10, 2^F

→

leevarchu

06/17 15:10, , 3^F

06/17 15:10, 3^F