Re: [閒聊] Byron Scott 執教生涯
Lin defense highlights,其實 08/01 14:42
: → Kreen:他壓的蠻出去的,橫向速度也還不賴。 08/01 14:42
: 推 spko:以一個身材放PG有明顯優勢的人來說,Lin的移位速度很不錯 08/01 14:44
: → spko:手跟腳步的壓迫也很積極,只是休斯頓真的很不愛他.... 08/01 14:45
: 推 spko:關於Lin的防守可以看這篇:http://ppt.cc/T6gs 08/01 15:25
話說這連結文章有夠長...我這邊有些整理過的數據可以看看,
而且剛好可以和去年入選年度防守二隊的隊友P.Beverly做個對比.
Opponent PPP(對位球員每回合進攻效率)
Vs Lin:0.86分
Vs PB :0.88分
油漆區內對位球員(含協防 補防)
Vs Lin:場均16次 命中58.3%
Vs PB : 18次 59.7%
中距離
Vs Lin:場均14 次 命中38.5%
VS PB : 16.3次 38.2%
三分線外
Vs Lin:場均14次 命中34.7%
Vs PB : 13 35.2%
Opponent PG 48-Minute Production (對位PG的進攻效率)
Vs Lin:effectiveFG%(有效命中):44.1% Per13.3
Vs PB : 48.0% Per14.3
火箭2013-2014 每百回合失分 (spko大那連結也有提到的表格:Defensive Rating)
on(該球員在場上時) off(該球員不在場上時)
DRtg:Lin on 104.9 off 107.6 +/- -2.7
PB 105.4 106.7 -1.3
我們都知道光靠數據是不能完全當作是一個球員防守好壞的基準,
只是林貝剛好都在火箭,主打的位置也是PG,所以還是拿來當作參考比較還是OK的.
就以數據來看,Lin與PB的防守不相上下,樂觀的說Lin也是防守二隊等級的呢!(?)
(那火箭的外圍防守怎還可以這麼爛?)
另外附上湖人今年的球探報告
Laker Scouting Reports: http://ppt.cc/pos5
文章很長而且廢話有點多,我只貼防守評價的部份
On defense, Lin actually rates very well. After adjusting by position, Lin
was 77th out of 430 NBA players by defensive RPM the past year, a very good
mark; 82games also agrees with this idea, with the Rockets being nearly three
points defensively with Lin on the court. nbawowy also agrees, with the
Rockets being 0.01 points per possession better defensively with Lin on the
court. Lin-based lineups defended layups better by nearly three percent,
while defending threes better by 0.6%. These markers are not a fluke, given
that Lin also played good team defense during the time of Linsanity. Lin is
also an excellent shotblocker by position (7th out of 63 point guards),
continuing excellent rates that were seen in college and illustrating his
savvy in leveraging his height to make up for lack of length. Still, Lin's
imposed-athletic markers really, really tailed off this past season, with a
defensive rebound rate in the bottom fifth of all NBA point guards. Lin put
up excellent rebounding numbers in college and had put up a top 15 rebound
rate in New York. After years of top-notch thievery in college and in his
first three years in the league, Lin was also in the bottom third in steal
rate this past year, but this might normalize back to its past levels, and
considering the very good defense he might have played more contain-level
defense the past year.
在防守端,林的表現其實非常優秀.在對他不穩定的出場位置和時間(這邊指的應該
是火箭時期要輪流扛1 2號衛)進行必要的數據調整後,林去年的防守效率可以排在
全聯盟430名球員中的第77位.對火箭上個賽季的數據分析也可以證明這點,林在場
上時,火箭場均失分降低3分.NBA數據也表明林在場上時,火箭每回合失分減少0.01
分(0.01PPP).林在場上時,火箭的防守效率提升約3%,同時使得對手三分命中率下降
0.6%.這些數據沒有誇大其詞,即使在林來瘋時期,林依然表現了很好的協防能力.
在控衛中,林的火鍋也十分突出(聯盟63名PG中排名第7).優秀的防守效率表明林用
他的球場智商來彌補他臂展不足的缺點.但即使如此,林在上賽季於防守端的表現
和他大學時期相比還是縮水了些.上賽季林在爭搶防守籃板效率處於聯盟控衛下游
但在大學時期的林卻是個籃板好手.即使在紐約時期,林的籃板效率依然排在控衛
前15名.林在大學和紐約時期的抄截也十分搶眼,但在上個賽季他的抄截效率也只
排在控衛中的倒數第三.考慮到他將會在未來獲得比火箭時期更明確的防守任務,
這些下降的數據有可能會回升.
Lin was better defending point guards than shooting guards, holding down
their scoring rate by nearly five points while reducing the efficiency by
nearly ten percent, and in general he allows opposing guards to score. The
ideal scenario to prevent crossmatching, and optimizing Lin, would create an
offense centralized around him to allow him to play point guard at a
reasonable level, so he can defend point guards well while being a positive
on the team's offense. Lin appears to really, really elevate his game on all
facets when he has the ball in his hands, and this even extends to rebounding
and stealing the ball. A Lin at past year's level would require
crossmatching--a SG offensively, and a PG defensively.
在防守端林對位PG的表現比對位SG要好.在對位PG時,林對位的球員得分會下降大約
5分,效率會下降至10%之譜.但當林面對錯位防守時,他的對手往往能憑藉身高優勢
取分.林應當在球隊中充當控衛角色來激發他的進攻潛力同時發揮他的防守優勢,
所有數據都顯示出,在擁有球權時林的表現會有大量的提升,甚至包含了籃板和抄截.
從林上賽季的表現來看,林在進攻端應當成為攻擊箭頭,而在防守端應該讓他去對位
對方的PG.
去年文章報導說Lin防守差的媒體,有注意的話就會發現大都是休士頓當地的媒體...
相反其他地區的文章就通常不是這回事.而是給Lin好評的居多.
很現實的,連續兩年火箭都被認為外圍防守糟糕(這點休士頓媒體球迷自己都承認)
如果你有個PB是年度防守二隊,然後有個Lin的防守也是差不多等級,
那麼最後會怪到誰頭上去呢?
所以就不要再給去年的休士頓媒體炒作給誤導了.
畢竟Lin去年被踢到板凳後很明顯就不在火箭未來藍圖了,加上他那有爭議性的合約
自然當地風向就把黑鍋丟給他背了.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.167.139.114
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Lakers/M.1406881829.A.504.html
※ 編輯: watwmark (118.167.139.114), 08/01/2014 16:31:52
推
08/01 16:35, , 1F
08/01 16:35, 1F
推
08/01 16:36, , 2F
08/01 16:36, 2F
→
08/01 16:37, , 3F
08/01 16:37, 3F
→
08/01 16:37, , 4F
08/01 16:37, 4F
我個人的想法是,比起進攻,防守更是個可以靠意志(專注)補正的課題,
然後紐約林來瘋那9戰8勝,其實是靠防守贏球而不是進攻,只是Lin當時表現很顯眼
所以都聚焦在他以及數據,湖人下季成員大都年輕,防守把態度拿出來就夠
剩下的就靠Scott在體系上做嚴謹的set來讓球隊防守能有個雛型出來,
至於kobe身體狀況,我想教練腦袋清楚的話應該會儘量安排較輕鬆的工作給他.
我知道kobe有眼睛盯著球跑的壞習慣,這點能注意不要被他對位的空手球員
太容易鑽入空檔我覺得就很足夠了.
推
08/01 16:46, , 5F
08/01 16:46, 5F
→
08/01 16:47, , 6F
08/01 16:47, 6F
→
08/01 16:47, , 7F
08/01 16:47, 7F
※ 編輯: watwmark (118.167.139.114), 08/01/2014 16:56:54
→
08/01 16:49, , 8F
08/01 16:49, 8F
推
08/01 16:52, , 9F
08/01 16:52, 9F
推
08/01 16:52, , 10F
08/01 16:52, 10F
推
08/01 16:53, , 11F
08/01 16:53, 11F
推
08/01 16:53, , 12F
08/01 16:53, 12F
推
08/01 16:55, , 13F
08/01 16:55, 13F
→
08/01 16:55, , 14F
08/01 16:55, 14F
→
08/01 16:57, , 15F
08/01 16:57, 15F
感謝,已修正@@
→
08/01 16:57, , 16F
08/01 16:57, 16F
其實就很簡單,鬍獸定調就是火箭未來核心,然後Lin Asik這兩個萬用包組合
火箭其實季中動作很明顯就是要丟,加上火箭Morey操作方式擺明就是要玩三巨
那已經不再未來藍圖的球員加上身上又背著頗具爭議性的合約,那球團的操作
肯定是要他去領繩嗎,總不成要領底薪的去領繩 囧rz
推
08/01 16:57, , 17F
08/01 16:57, 17F
※ 編輯: watwmark (118.167.139.114), 08/01/2014 17:02:25
推
08/01 17:00, , 18F
08/01 17:00, 18F
→
08/01 17:01, , 19F
08/01 17:01, 19F
→
08/01 17:03, , 20F
08/01 17:03, 20F
→
08/01 17:04, , 21F
08/01 17:04, 21F
→
08/01 17:05, , 22F
08/01 17:05, 22F
→
08/01 17:10, , 23F
08/01 17:10, 23F
推
08/01 17:20, , 24F
08/01 17:20, 24F
推
08/01 17:21, , 25F
08/01 17:21, 25F
推
08/01 17:25, , 26F
08/01 17:25, 26F
推
08/01 17:29, , 27F
08/01 17:29, 27F
推
08/01 17:30, , 28F
08/01 17:30, 28F
→
08/01 17:30, , 29F
08/01 17:30, 29F
推
08/01 17:30, , 30F
08/01 17:30, 30F
推
08/01 17:31, , 31F
08/01 17:31, 31F
→
08/01 17:32, , 32F
08/01 17:32, 32F
→
08/01 17:33, , 33F
08/01 17:33, 33F
推
08/01 17:34, , 34F
08/01 17:34, 34F
還有 107 則推文
還有 3 段內文
→
08/01 21:21, , 142F
08/01 21:21, 142F
推
08/01 21:23, , 143F
08/01 21:23, 143F
推
08/01 21:24, , 144F
08/01 21:24, 144F
推
08/01 21:24, , 145F
08/01 21:24, 145F
推
08/01 21:25, , 146F
08/01 21:25, 146F
推
08/01 21:39, , 147F
08/01 21:39, 147F
→
08/01 21:39, , 148F
08/01 21:39, 148F
→
08/01 21:44, , 149F
08/01 21:44, 149F
推
08/01 21:52, , 150F
08/01 21:52, 150F
→
08/01 21:52, , 151F
08/01 21:52, 151F
→
08/01 21:52, , 152F
08/01 21:52, 152F
推
08/01 21:57, , 153F
08/01 21:57, 153F
→
08/01 21:57, , 154F
08/01 21:57, 154F
→
08/01 21:58, , 155F
08/01 21:58, 155F
→
08/01 21:59, , 156F
08/01 21:59, 156F
→
08/01 21:59, , 157F
08/01 21:59, 157F
推
08/01 22:00, , 158F
08/01 22:00, 158F
→
08/01 22:02, , 159F
08/01 22:02, 159F
推
08/01 22:05, , 160F
08/01 22:05, 160F
→
08/01 22:05, , 161F
08/01 22:05, 161F
推
08/01 23:18, , 162F
08/01 23:18, 162F
推
08/01 23:24, , 163F
08/01 23:24, 163F
推
08/01 23:26, , 164F
08/01 23:26, 164F
推
08/01 23:29, , 165F
08/01 23:29, 165F
推
08/01 23:31, , 166F
08/01 23:31, 166F
推
08/01 23:31, , 167F
08/01 23:31, 167F
推
08/01 23:32, , 168F
08/01 23:32, 168F
推
08/01 23:33, , 169F
08/01 23:33, 169F
推
08/01 23:39, , 170F
08/01 23:39, 170F
→
08/01 23:51, , 171F
08/01 23:51, 171F
推
08/02 00:55, , 172F
08/02 00:55, 172F
→
08/02 01:49, , 173F
08/02 01:49, 173F
推
08/02 01:51, , 174F
08/02 01:51, 174F
推
08/02 08:04, , 175F
08/02 08:04, 175F
推
08/02 09:44, , 176F
08/02 09:44, 176F
推
08/02 12:47, , 177F
08/02 12:47, 177F
推
08/02 19:02, , 178F
08/02 19:02, 178F
→
08/02 19:33, , 179F
08/02 19:33, 179F
推
08/03 19:34, , 180F
08/03 19:34, 180F
推
08/03 21:36, , 181F
08/03 21:36, 181F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):