Re: [問題] Kobe V.S Lakers
如果有人說打贏熱火是KOBE一個人的功勞,那會不會有人覺得很奇怪?
好像也沒錯是嗎?因為他那場投籃命中率那麼高?
如果你覺得不是,認為那是團隊合作,是大家努力的成果
那為什麼輸球就要全扯在一個人身上,為什麼輸球好像跟一切其他都無關
為什麼跟外圍的持續低迷無關,跟籃板球掌握的很差無關,跟失誤無關...etc
為什麼只跟這傢伙該死的出手選擇有關?
我不知道有沒有所謂的科迷會否認說這傢伙有時候出手很腦衝?
我相信是沒有,
有沒有所謂的科迷會否認雙塔很強,值得期待,球應該多交給內線?
我相信也是沒有,
大家要說的要爭的,只是一些人太過尖銳的批判,
那些人習慣把全部的過錯都加諸到這傢伙身上,
幾乎已經是用放大鏡般的檢視每一球,然後在堂而皇之的將自己的言論
冠上我是為湖人好的大名
就好像有些人總把Fisher批判的一文不值那般,那種言論幾乎把他視為垃圾
這樣是對的嗎?令人可以接受的嗎?
World peace~
--
Lay down your arms, give up the fight
Throw up your arms into the sky
you and I :>
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.160.193.77
推
03/09 14:21, , 1F
03/09 14:21, 1F
推
03/09 14:21, , 2F
03/09 14:21, 2F
推
03/09 14:23, , 3F
03/09 14:23, 3F
推
03/09 14:25, , 4F
03/09 14:25, 4F
推
03/09 14:25, , 5F
03/09 14:25, 5F
推
03/09 14:25, , 6F
03/09 14:25, 6F
推
03/09 14:25, , 7F
03/09 14:25, 7F
→
03/09 14:26, , 8F
03/09 14:26, 8F
→
03/09 14:26, , 9F
03/09 14:26, 9F
推
03/09 14:26, , 10F
03/09 14:26, 10F
→
03/09 14:26, , 11F
03/09 14:26, 11F
→
03/09 14:27, , 12F
03/09 14:27, 12F
推
03/09 14:27, , 13F
03/09 14:27, 13F
推
03/09 14:27, , 14F
03/09 14:27, 14F
推
03/09 14:27, , 15F
03/09 14:27, 15F
→
03/09 14:28, , 16F
03/09 14:28, 16F
推
03/09 14:28, , 17F
03/09 14:28, 17F
推
03/09 14:28, , 18F
03/09 14:28, 18F
推
03/09 14:28, , 19F
03/09 14:28, 19F
推
03/09 14:29, , 20F
03/09 14:29, 20F
→
03/09 14:29, , 21F
03/09 14:29, 21F
→
03/09 14:29, , 22F
03/09 14:29, 22F
→
03/09 14:29, , 23F
03/09 14:29, 23F
→
03/09 14:29, , 24F
03/09 14:29, 24F
→
03/09 14:29, , 25F
03/09 14:29, 25F
→
03/09 14:29, , 26F
03/09 14:29, 26F
推
03/09 14:30, , 27F
03/09 14:30, 27F
推
03/09 14:30, , 28F
03/09 14:30, 28F
→
03/09 14:30, , 29F
03/09 14:30, 29F
→
03/09 14:30, , 30F
03/09 14:30, 30F
→
03/09 14:30, , 31F
03/09 14:30, 31F
→
03/09 14:30, , 32F
03/09 14:30, 32F
→
03/09 14:31, , 33F
03/09 14:31, 33F
→
03/09 14:31, , 34F
03/09 14:31, 34F
→
03/09 14:31, , 35F
03/09 14:31, 35F
→
03/09 14:32, , 36F
03/09 14:32, 36F
→
03/09 14:32, , 37F
03/09 14:32, 37F
→
03/09 14:33, , 38F
03/09 14:33, 38F
推
03/09 14:34, , 39F
03/09 14:34, 39F
還有 148 則推文
→
03/09 16:08, , 188F
03/09 16:08, 188F
→
03/09 16:10, , 189F
03/09 16:10, 189F
推
03/09 16:11, , 190F
03/09 16:11, 190F
→
03/09 16:11, , 191F
03/09 16:11, 191F
→
03/09 16:12, , 192F
03/09 16:12, 192F
→
03/09 16:13, , 193F
03/09 16:13, 193F
→
03/09 16:13, , 194F
03/09 16:13, 194F
推
03/09 16:13, , 195F
03/09 16:13, 195F
→
03/09 16:14, , 196F
03/09 16:14, 196F
推
03/09 16:14, , 197F
03/09 16:14, 197F
→
03/09 16:15, , 198F
03/09 16:15, 198F
→
03/09 16:15, , 199F
03/09 16:15, 199F
→
03/09 16:16, , 200F
03/09 16:16, 200F
→
03/09 16:16, , 201F
03/09 16:16, 201F
→
03/09 16:17, , 202F
03/09 16:17, 202F
→
03/09 16:18, , 203F
03/09 16:18, 203F
→
03/09 16:19, , 204F
03/09 16:19, 204F
→
03/09 16:20, , 205F
03/09 16:20, 205F
推
03/09 16:21, , 206F
03/09 16:21, 206F
→
03/09 16:22, , 207F
03/09 16:22, 207F
推
03/09 16:23, , 208F
03/09 16:23, 208F
推
03/09 16:24, , 209F
03/09 16:24, 209F
推
03/09 16:25, , 210F
03/09 16:25, 210F
→
03/09 16:25, , 211F
03/09 16:25, 211F
推
03/09 16:29, , 212F
03/09 16:29, 212F
→
03/09 16:29, , 213F
03/09 16:29, 213F
推
03/09 16:30, , 214F
03/09 16:30, 214F
→
03/09 16:31, , 215F
03/09 16:31, 215F
→
03/09 16:32, , 216F
03/09 16:32, 216F
推
03/09 17:32, , 217F
03/09 17:32, 217F
→
03/09 17:32, , 218F
03/09 17:32, 218F
→
03/09 17:34, , 219F
03/09 17:34, 219F
→
03/09 17:34, , 220F
03/09 17:34, 220F
推
03/09 17:42, , 221F
03/09 17:42, 221F
推
03/09 18:41, , 222F
03/09 18:41, 222F
→
03/09 18:42, , 223F
03/09 18:42, 223F
→
03/09 18:44, , 224F
03/09 18:44, 224F
推
03/09 18:57, , 225F
03/09 18:57, 225F
推
03/13 14:04, , 226F
03/13 14:04, 226F
→
09/11 06:01, , 227F
09/11 06:01, 227F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 8 篇):
問題
92
270