Re: [轉錄][外絮] J.Smith + K.Hinrich <-> A.Bynu …
: 老鷹 湖人
: Josh Smith <--> Andrew Bynum
: Kirk Hinrich Ron Artest
: 但這...真的是雙方真正需要的嗎?
: 以上文章僅摘譯,詳情請點:http://goo.gl/Uu0GT
: 亞特蘭大新聞憲政報 相關外電:http://goo.gl/T2Z37
這筆交易對湖人來說沒有意義。
湖人現在做交易,求的不只是變,而且是要變的有機會重新衝擊冠軍。
簡單說,能搶最好,不能搶也要是賺的。
Kobe&Gasol還在,Josh跟Kirk就是只能當第三第四得分點。
Kirk是完美的後衛補強,身高高不爭球權防守好有外線。
但Josh?
換到他對湖人整體有什麼幫助可言嗎?
活動力?但湖人缺活動力的是一二三號。
他幾乎是確定沒辦法打三號的,不三不四的打法湖人已經有了其中的王者Odom。
外線更是他完全無法提供的地方,而這是一個第三第四得分點最需要的。
交易Bynum後,Gasol勢必打中鋒,
看了今年的慘狀,還有人相信"現在"的Gasol扛得起中鋒嗎?
他"現在"連比他小號很多的大前鋒都不一定扛得住了。
若要交易Bynum就一定要拿回一個能扛中鋒的人選,
但這筆交易很顯然是拿不到的,老鷹自己都缺死了。
三塔可以拆,但必須拆的精打細算,這交易的人選就是拆東牆補西牆而已。
換Kirk就要失去Bynum,這是完全不划算的交易。
如果老鷹要的是Odom就可以考慮,他的位置要Josh補上還算有些機會,
可這對老鷹就沒誘因了,老鷹就是要找個人回去幫忙扛中鋒。
但Josh換成Hoford的話,可以喔^_<
雖然不可能啦,科科。
Artest:我勒?我勒?輪到我了嗎?
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 115.82.167.152
※ 編輯: Maxslack 來自: 115.82.167.152 (05/29 02:58)
→
05/29 02:59, , 1F
05/29 02:59, 1F
→
05/29 03:34, , 2F
05/29 03:34, 2F
推
05/29 03:37, , 3F
05/29 03:37, 3F
→
05/29 03:38, , 4F
05/29 03:38, 4F
→
05/29 03:39, , 5F
05/29 03:39, 5F
推
05/29 03:39, , 6F
05/29 03:39, 6F
→
05/29 03:39, , 7F
05/29 03:39, 7F
→
05/29 03:40, , 8F
05/29 03:40, 8F
推
05/29 04:06, , 9F
05/29 04:06, 9F
推
05/29 06:40, , 10F
05/29 06:40, 10F
→
05/29 06:41, , 11F
05/29 06:41, 11F
→
05/29 06:42, , 12F
05/29 06:42, 12F
→
05/29 06:43, , 13F
05/29 06:43, 13F
推
05/29 08:46, , 14F
05/29 08:46, 14F
推
05/29 09:10, , 15F
05/29 09:10, 15F
→
05/29 09:10, , 16F
05/29 09:10, 16F
→
05/29 09:11, , 17F
05/29 09:11, 17F
→
05/29 09:12, , 18F
05/29 09:12, 18F
→
05/29 09:13, , 19F
05/29 09:13, 19F
→
05/29 09:14, , 20F
05/29 09:14, 20F
→
05/29 09:15, , 21F
05/29 09:15, 21F
→
05/29 09:16, , 22F
05/29 09:16, 22F
推
05/29 09:40, , 23F
05/29 09:40, 23F
推
05/29 10:06, , 24F
05/29 10:06, 24F
→
05/29 10:07, , 25F
05/29 10:07, 25F
→
05/29 10:13, , 26F
05/29 10:13, 26F
→
05/29 10:13, , 27F
05/29 10:13, 27F
→
05/29 10:14, , 28F
05/29 10:14, 28F
→
05/29 10:15, , 29F
05/29 10:15, 29F
→
05/29 10:15, , 30F
05/29 10:15, 30F
→
05/29 10:16, , 31F
05/29 10:16, 31F
→
05/29 10:16, , 32F
05/29 10:16, 32F
→
05/29 10:17, , 33F
05/29 10:17, 33F
→
05/29 10:17, , 34F
05/29 10:17, 34F
→
05/29 10:17, , 35F
05/29 10:17, 35F
→
05/29 10:18, , 36F
05/29 10:18, 36F
推
05/29 10:20, , 37F
05/29 10:20, 37F
→
05/29 10:21, , 38F
05/29 10:21, 38F
→
05/29 10:22, , 39F
05/29 10:22, 39F
還有 38 則推文
→
05/29 10:51, , 78F
05/29 10:51, 78F
推
05/29 10:53, , 79F
05/29 10:53, 79F
→
05/29 10:53, , 80F
05/29 10:53, 80F
推
05/29 11:11, , 81F
05/29 11:11, 81F
推
05/29 11:15, , 82F
05/29 11:15, 82F
→
05/29 11:15, , 83F
05/29 11:15, 83F
→
05/29 11:16, , 84F
05/29 11:16, 84F
→
05/29 11:17, , 85F
05/29 11:17, 85F
→
05/29 11:18, , 86F
05/29 11:18, 86F
推
05/29 11:19, , 87F
05/29 11:19, 87F
→
05/29 11:19, , 88F
05/29 11:19, 88F
推
05/29 11:24, , 89F
05/29 11:24, 89F
推
05/29 11:33, , 90F
05/29 11:33, 90F
推
05/29 11:36, , 91F
05/29 11:36, 91F
→
05/29 11:36, , 92F
05/29 11:36, 92F
→
05/29 11:37, , 93F
05/29 11:37, 93F
→
05/29 11:38, , 94F
05/29 11:38, 94F
→
05/29 11:38, , 95F
05/29 11:38, 95F
→
05/29 11:39, , 96F
05/29 11:39, 96F
→
05/29 11:40, , 97F
05/29 11:40, 97F
→
05/29 11:41, , 98F
05/29 11:41, 98F
推
05/29 11:42, , 99F
05/29 11:42, 99F
→
05/29 11:42, , 100F
05/29 11:42, 100F
推
05/29 12:09, , 101F
05/29 12:09, 101F
→
05/29 12:13, , 102F
05/29 12:13, 102F
推
05/29 12:17, , 103F
05/29 12:17, 103F
推
05/29 12:18, , 104F
05/29 12:18, 104F
推
05/29 12:33, , 105F
05/29 12:33, 105F
推
05/29 13:00, , 106F
05/29 13:00, 106F
→
05/29 13:01, , 107F
05/29 13:01, 107F
→
05/29 13:02, , 108F
05/29 13:02, 108F
→
05/29 13:02, , 109F
05/29 13:02, 109F
→
05/29 13:03, , 110F
05/29 13:03, 110F
推
05/29 16:07, , 111F
05/29 16:07, 111F
推
05/29 16:39, , 112F
05/29 16:39, 112F
→
05/29 16:54, , 113F
05/29 16:54, 113F
→
05/29 18:06, , 114F
05/29 18:06, 114F
→
08/08 13:57, , 115F
08/08 13:57, 115F
→
09/11 05:33, , 116F
09/11 05:33, 116F
→
12/11 20:20,
7年前
, 117F
12/11 20:20, 117F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):