[轉錄][外絮] Los Angeles Lakers: Not Just K …
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1CtsO3Qd ]
作者: loed () 看板: NBA
標題: [外絮] Los Angeles Lakers: Not Just Kobe Bryant's Team
時間: Sun Nov 14 12:30:56 2010
中文不負責任摘要(酸民請看完原文再討論):
該作者認為湖人不只是Kobe的球隊。
Gasol已經成長為NBA中名列前茅的優質長人，他對湖人隊的貢獻度是難以估量的。
Gasol於湖人的戰術體系中如魚得水，效率值也是聯盟前五，有必要為其地位平反。
Gasol已經成長到近似於Shaquille O'Neal於湖人三連霸中的地位了。
Kobe無庸置疑的還是聯盟中的超級球星，但已經不是湖人隊中的絕對領袖了。
Los Angeles Lakers: Not Just Kobe Bryant's Team
By Jack Winter (Correspondent) on November 12, 2010
The LA Lakers' amazing start to the 2010-2011 NBA season signaled a changing
of the guard for the two-time defending champions. This is no longer just
Kobe Bryant's team. The Lakers belong to Pau Gasol as much as they do anyone
else.
Gasol has long been considered one of the premier frontcourt players in the
league. Even so, there are some who believe that his play for the Lakers has
gone undervalued by most fans. Opening this season, his easy dominance
ensures that will no longer be the case.
In leading LA to a 8-1 start, the nine year veteran has taken his game to
another level on each end of the floor. Gasol is averaging 22.7 points and
11.8 rebounds per game this season, both of which are career highs.
Additionally, he is fifth in the league in PER, posting a stellar number of
26.29.
It is no fluke that Gasol's increased offensive workload has coincided with
the Lakers leading the league - by a comfortable margin - in offensive
efficiency. Quite simply, LA is best when the ball is in the Spaniard's
hands.
Acknowledging that Bryant is no longer LA's clear cut best, or most valuable
player, is no slight to the superstar SG. Rather, its a confirmation of
Gasol's ascent to the top of the NBA pyramid.
By all accounts, he has been one of the five best players in the league this
season. There isn't a big man in the NBA who has been such a force, both
scoring and rebounding the basketball, to start the young year.
It is time we start recognizing Gasol for what he is: the best all around
post player in the world. In doing so, its vital to give him as much credit
for the Lakers' early success as anyone else.
Kobe fans may not like admitting that his significance to LA has been, at
least, matched by another player. However, given his early play, it appears
even Bryant is willing to share the reigns with Gasol.
Bryant took fewer than 23 shots in the Lakers first seven games, a streak
rarely matched throughout his storied career. In fact, he is averaging fewer
shot attempts this season than he has since 2004. It is no coincidence then,
that Gasol is taking more shots than he ever has as a Laker.
Gasol and Bryant becoming a true tandem is in the best interest of the
Lakers. It saves wear and tear on the latter's achy body, and gives the team
a more balanced offensive attack. Additionally, preparing for a Los Angeles
team with two primary scorers, rather than one dominant force, is tougher for
the opposition.
If Gasol's dominance continues throughout the season, Los Angeles will be the
best its been since 2002, when the combination of Bryant and the league's
best post player— Shaquille O'Neal—finished off a three-peat.
Behind Gasol's increased role, there's no reason the Lakers' new 1-2 punch
can't do the same.
http://goo.gl/tDmu4
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.126.112.44
※ 編輯: Ken52039 來自: 122.126.112.44 (11/14 12:48)
推
11/14 12:50, , 1F
11/14 12:50, 1F
推
11/14 12:51, , 2F
11/14 12:51, 2F
推
11/14 12:51, , 3F
11/14 12:51, 3F
→
11/14 12:51, , 4F
11/14 12:51, 4F
推
11/14 12:53, , 5F
11/14 12:53, 5F
推
11/14 12:54, , 6F
11/14 12:54, 6F
→
11/14 12:55, , 7F
11/14 12:55, 7F
→
11/14 12:55, , 8F
11/14 12:55, 8F
→
11/14 12:55, , 9F
11/14 12:55, 9F
→
11/14 12:57, , 10F
11/14 12:57, 10F
推
11/14 12:57, , 11F
11/14 12:57, 11F
推
11/14 13:03, , 12F
11/14 13:03, 12F
推
11/14 13:04, , 13F
11/14 13:04, 13F
推
11/14 13:08, , 14F
11/14 13:08, 14F
→
11/14 13:08, , 15F
11/14 13:08, 15F
推
11/14 13:11, , 16F
11/14 13:11, 16F
→
11/14 13:12, , 17F
11/14 13:12, 17F
推
11/14 13:14, , 18F
11/14 13:14, 18F
推
11/14 13:19, , 19F
11/14 13:19, 19F
推
11/14 13:21, , 20F
11/14 13:21, 20F
→
11/14 13:21, , 21F
11/14 13:21, 21F
→
11/14 13:21, , 22F
11/14 13:21, 22F
推
11/14 13:38, , 23F
11/14 13:38, 23F
推
11/14 13:43, , 24F
11/14 13:43, 24F
推
11/14 13:59, , 25F
11/14 13:59, 25F
→
11/14 14:00, , 26F
11/14 14:00, 26F
推
11/14 14:06, , 27F
11/14 14:06, 27F
推
11/14 14:48, , 28F
11/14 14:48, 28F
推
11/14 16:14, , 29F
11/14 16:14, 29F
推
11/14 16:19, , 30F
11/14 16:19, 30F
→
11/14 16:28, , 31F
11/14 16:28, 31F
→
11/14 16:37, , 32F
11/14 16:37, 32F
→
11/14 16:38, , 33F
11/14 16:38, 33F
→
11/14 16:38, , 34F
11/14 16:38, 34F
推
11/14 16:53, , 35F
11/14 16:53, 35F
→
11/14 16:54, , 36F
11/14 16:54, 36F
→
11/14 16:55, , 37F
11/14 16:55, 37F
→
11/14 16:56, , 38F
11/14 16:56, 38F
→
11/14 16:56, , 39F
11/14 16:56, 39F
推
11/14 18:04, , 40F
11/14 18:04, 40F
→
11/14 18:49, , 41F
11/14 18:49, 41F
→
11/14 18:50, , 42F
11/14 18:50, 42F
→
11/14 18:51, , 43F
11/14 18:51, 43F
→
11/14 18:52, , 44F
11/14 18:52, 44F
→
11/14 18:53, , 45F
11/14 18:53, 45F
→
11/14 18:54, , 46F
11/14 18:54, 46F
→
11/14 18:55, , 47F
11/14 18:55, 47F
→
11/14 18:56, , 48F
11/14 18:56, 48F
→
11/14 20:01, , 49F
11/14 20:01, 49F
推
11/14 20:38, , 50F
11/14 20:38, 50F
推
11/14 21:04, , 51F
11/14 21:04, 51F
→
11/14 21:04, , 52F
11/14 21:04, 52F
推
11/14 22:49, , 53F
11/14 22:49, 53F
推
11/15 00:43, , 54F
11/15 00:43, 54F
推
11/15 09:58, , 55F
11/15 09:58, 55F
推
11/15 10:06, , 56F
11/15 10:06, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇)：