Re: [閒聊] 哪個韓團人員變動 最不能讓人接受呢
應該是t-ara吧
因為花英任性被經紀公司解約
整團當紅時瞬間黑掉
不只其它團員在韓國被討厭
連經紀公司在民眾心中也非好感
我想應該沒任何一團
成員變動引發效應能超過t-ara
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.204.132.244
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/KoreaStar/M.1465909575.A.439.html
→
06/14 21:13, , 1F
06/14 21:13, 1F
→
06/14 21:14, , 2F
06/14 21:14, 2F
→
06/14 21:15, , 3F
06/14 21:15, 3F
→
06/14 21:17, , 4F
06/14 21:17, 4F
噓
06/14 21:19, , 5F
06/14 21:19, 5F
推
06/14 21:20, , 6F
06/14 21:20, 6F
→
06/14 21:23, , 7F
06/14 21:23, 7F
→
06/14 21:24, , 8F
06/14 21:24, 8F
推
06/14 21:24, , 9F
06/14 21:24, 9F
→
06/14 21:27, , 10F
06/14 21:27, 10F
→
06/14 21:29, , 11F
06/14 21:29, 11F
推
06/14 21:31, , 12F
06/14 21:31, 12F
推
06/14 21:31, , 13F
06/14 21:31, 13F
→
06/14 21:31, , 14F
06/14 21:31, 14F
確實找不到任何一團因成員變動 能超越t-ara的 不是t-ara Fans 才這麼說
推
06/14 21:37, , 15F
06/14 21:37, 15F
→
06/14 21:40, , 16F
06/14 21:40, 16F
→
06/14 21:41, , 17F
06/14 21:41, 17F
※ 編輯: sex8088 (123.204.132.244), 06/14/2016 21:44:00
推
06/14 21:43, , 18F
06/14 21:43, 18F
那個思聰本身爭議很大 還有落難藝人到中國發展 很少不用負出代價的
說真t-ara要到中國發展 還不如退出演藝圈找個好人家嫁
※ 編輯: sex8088 (123.204.132.244), 06/14/2016 21:47:42
推
06/14 21:46, , 19F
06/14 21:46, 19F
→
06/14 21:48, , 20F
06/14 21:48, 20F
→
06/14 21:48, , 21F
06/14 21:48, 21F
→
06/14 21:49, , 22F
06/14 21:49, 22F
→
06/14 21:50, , 23F
06/14 21:50, 23F
推
06/14 21:52, , 24F
06/14 21:52, 24F
→
06/14 21:53, , 25F
06/14 21:53, 25F
→
06/14 21:53, , 26F
06/14 21:53, 26F
→
06/14 21:54, , 27F
06/14 21:54, 27F
推
06/14 21:54, , 28F
06/14 21:54, 28F
→
06/14 21:54, , 29F
06/14 21:54, 29F
→
06/14 21:55, , 30F
06/14 21:55, 30F
噓
06/14 21:55, , 31F
06/14 21:55, 31F
→
06/14 21:55, , 32F
06/14 21:55, 32F
噓
06/14 21:57, , 33F
06/14 21:57, 33F
推
06/14 21:58, , 34F
06/14 21:58, 34F
噓
06/14 21:59, , 35F
06/14 21:59, 35F
噓
06/14 22:00, , 36F
06/14 22:00, 36F
還有 58 則推文
→
06/15 01:18, , 95F
06/15 01:18, 95F
推
06/15 01:22, , 96F
06/15 01:22, 96F
推
06/15 01:24, , 97F
06/15 01:24, 97F
推
06/15 02:12, , 98F
06/15 02:12, 98F
→
06/15 02:12, , 99F
06/15 02:12, 99F
推
06/15 02:15, , 100F
06/15 02:15, 100F
推
06/15 02:21, , 101F
06/15 02:21, 101F
→
06/15 06:12, , 102F
06/15 06:12, 102F
推
06/15 07:14, , 103F
06/15 07:14, 103F
推
06/15 07:31, , 104F
06/15 07:31, 104F
推
06/15 08:11, , 105F
06/15 08:11, 105F
→
06/15 08:27, , 106F
06/15 08:27, 106F
→
06/15 08:40, , 107F
06/15 08:40, 107F
→
06/15 08:41, , 108F
06/15 08:41, 108F
推
06/15 09:23, , 109F
06/15 09:23, 109F
推
06/15 10:50, , 110F
06/15 10:50, 110F
→
06/15 11:36, , 111F
06/15 11:36, 111F
→
06/15 11:37, , 112F
06/15 11:37, 112F
→
06/15 11:59, , 113F
06/15 11:59, 113F
推
06/15 19:19, , 114F
06/15 19:19, 114F
→
06/15 19:19, , 115F
06/15 19:19, 115F
推
06/15 19:22, , 116F
06/15 19:22, 116F
推
06/15 19:44, , 117F
06/15 19:44, 117F
推
06/15 20:30, , 118F
06/15 20:30, 118F
→
06/15 20:44, , 119F
06/15 20:44, 119F
→
06/15 20:45, , 120F
06/15 20:45, 120F
→
06/15 20:46, , 121F
06/15 20:46, 121F
推
06/15 20:52, , 122F
06/15 20:52, 122F
推
06/15 21:57, , 123F
06/15 21:57, 123F
→
06/15 21:58, , 124F
06/15 21:58, 124F
→
06/15 21:58, , 125F
06/15 21:58, 125F
推
06/15 23:02, , 126F
06/15 23:02, 126F
→
06/15 23:02, , 127F
06/15 23:02, 127F
推
06/15 23:07, , 128F
06/15 23:07, 128F
推
06/16 12:44, , 129F
06/16 12:44, 129F
推
06/16 12:47, , 130F
06/16 12:47, 130F
→
06/16 12:49, , 131F
06/16 12:49, 131F
推
06/16 14:00, , 132F
06/16 14:00, 132F
→
06/16 14:01, , 133F
06/16 14:01, 133F
推
06/16 15:32, , 134F
06/16 15:32, 134F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):
閒聊
323
426