[外電] Knicks’ New Commitment Under Woodson
Knicks’ New Commitment Under Woodson Merely Temporary
By Steve Silverman, Yahoo! Contributor Network10 hours, 33 minutes ago
Here's what you have to realize if you are a New York Knicks fan. Your team
plays hard only when it wants to - and not on a game-in, game-out basis.
That should offend all Knicks fans. Whether Mike D'Antoni was a great coach
or a poor one, the Knicks owed it to themselves and the paying customers to
play with effort every night.
It's easy to see that they were not giving it their all under D'Antoni
because of how well they have played under interim coach Mike Woodson. They
have won their first three games under Woodson and the difference seems to be
that all players are now committed defensively to the gameplan. Defense is
about effort and it was missing in the last month under D'Antoni.
D'Antoni may not have used the same kind of direct language that Woodson has
used, but he told them the same thing. The Knicks players just didn't like
his tone or attitude.
So how long does it last during the Woodson regime? Another week? Ten days?
It will end sooner or later because this team has its own agenda. And the
Knicks defensive "commitment" does not have the feel of permanence.
Of course, the Knicks players have all heard the rumors. That next year, a
big name could be coming out of retirement to coach them. A big name who once
wore Knicks uniform and coach Michael Jordan, Shaquille O'Neal and Kobe
Bryant. Phil Jackson may want to end his coaching career on the Knicks
sidelines. It's just a rumor at this time. But if Jackson came to the Knicks,
he would understand how to get his message across to his players.
Reference:
New York Daily News - NY Knicks putting out effort under interim coach Mike
Woodson that was missing under former coach Mike D'Antoni
http://ppt.cc/rFDm
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.166.199.76
推
03/19 21:03, , 1F
03/19 21:03, 1F
→
03/19 21:04, , 2F
03/19 21:04, 2F
推
03/19 21:21, , 3F
03/19 21:21, 3F
推
03/19 21:22, , 4F
03/19 21:22, 4F
→
03/19 21:25, , 5F
03/19 21:25, 5F
→
03/19 21:26, , 6F
03/19 21:26, 6F
推
03/19 21:27, , 7F
03/19 21:27, 7F
→
03/19 21:30, , 8F
03/19 21:30, 8F
→
03/19 21:31, , 9F
03/19 21:31, 9F
→
03/19 21:32, , 10F
03/19 21:32, 10F
推
03/19 21:35, , 11F
03/19 21:35, 11F
→
03/19 21:37, , 12F
03/19 21:37, 12F
推
03/19 21:38, , 13F
03/19 21:38, 13F
→
03/19 21:38, , 14F
03/19 21:38, 14F
→
03/19 21:40, , 15F
03/19 21:40, 15F
→
03/19 21:41, , 16F
03/19 21:41, 16F
推
03/19 22:17, , 17F
03/19 22:17, 17F
→
03/19 22:18, , 18F
03/19 22:18, 18F
推
03/19 22:47, , 19F
03/19 22:47, 19F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):