[討教] 東邪有可能是最有機會打贏中神通的嗎?
如題
在射鵰 金庸有設定
金(歐陽) 木(黃藥師) 水(洪七公) 火(一燈) 土(王重陽)
洪七公曾跟靖蓉二人說一燈是歐陽鋒的剋星 因為火剋金 還有一陽指制蛤蟆功
那造這個五行相剋來講
只有木能剋土
所以黃藥師(木)有可能打贏王重陽(土)
第一次華山論劍打不贏是因為
1.黃藥師年輕其他四人十幾到二十幾歲
2.練武或想成為天下第一又沒有歐陽鋒練得那麼用功 認真
所以假使王重陽沒死的話
二次論劍 黃能打得贏王?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 210.66.48.209
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/JinYong/M.1411882311.A.582.html
推
09/28 13:36, , 1F
09/28 13:36, 1F
→
09/28 13:37, , 2F
09/28 13:37, 2F
推
09/28 13:39, , 3F
09/28 13:39, 3F
推
09/28 13:40, , 4F
09/28 13:40, 4F
→
09/28 13:41, , 5F
09/28 13:41, 5F
推
09/28 13:44, , 6F
09/28 13:44, 6F
推
09/28 13:47, , 7F
09/28 13:47, 7F
推
09/28 13:48, , 8F
09/28 13:48, 8F
推
09/28 13:49, , 9F
09/28 13:49, 9F
→
09/28 13:49, , 10F
09/28 13:49, 10F
→
09/28 13:49, , 11F
09/28 13:49, 11F
→
09/28 13:50, , 12F
09/28 13:50, 12F
推
09/28 14:42, , 13F
09/28 14:42, 13F
→
09/28 14:42, , 14F
09/28 14:42, 14F
→
09/28 14:43, , 15F
09/28 14:43, 15F
→
09/28 14:44, , 16F
09/28 14:44, 16F
→
09/28 14:44, , 17F
09/28 14:44, 17F
→
09/28 14:59, , 18F
09/28 14:59, 18F
→
09/28 15:00, , 19F
09/28 15:00, 19F
→
09/28 15:01, , 20F
09/28 15:01, 20F
→
09/28 15:01, , 21F
09/28 15:01, 21F
→
09/28 15:02, , 22F
09/28 15:02, 22F
推
09/28 15:58, , 23F
09/28 15:58, 23F
推
09/28 16:04, , 24F
09/28 16:04, 24F
推
09/28 16:44, , 25F
09/28 16:44, 25F
→
09/28 16:45, , 26F
09/28 16:45, 26F
→
09/28 16:46, , 27F
09/28 16:46, 27F
→
09/28 16:55, , 28F
09/28 16:55, 28F
→
09/28 17:01, , 29F
09/28 17:01, 29F
→
09/28 17:02, , 30F
09/28 17:02, 30F
推
09/28 18:46, , 31F
09/28 18:46, 31F
推
09/28 19:03, , 32F
09/28 19:03, 32F
→
09/28 19:03, , 33F
09/28 19:03, 33F
推
09/28 19:16, , 34F
09/28 19:16, 34F
→
09/28 21:14, , 35F
09/28 21:14, 35F
→
09/28 21:26, , 36F
09/28 21:26, 36F
→
09/28 21:26, , 37F
09/28 21:26, 37F
推
09/28 21:35, , 38F
09/28 21:35, 38F
→
09/28 21:35, , 39F
09/28 21:35, 39F
還有 37 則推文
→
09/29 12:15, , 77F
09/29 12:15, 77F
→
09/29 13:05, , 78F
09/29 13:05, 78F
推
09/29 13:39, , 79F
09/29 13:39, 79F
→
09/29 13:39, , 80F
09/29 13:39, 80F
推
09/29 13:42, , 81F
09/29 13:42, 81F
推
09/29 13:52, , 82F
09/29 13:52, 82F
→
09/29 13:54, , 83F
09/29 13:54, 83F
推
09/29 13:56, , 84F
09/29 13:56, 84F
推
09/29 14:09, , 85F
09/29 14:09, 85F
推
09/29 14:19, , 86F
09/29 14:19, 86F
推
09/29 14:27, , 87F
09/29 14:27, 87F
推
09/29 14:28, , 88F
09/29 14:28, 88F
推
09/29 14:34, , 89F
09/29 14:34, 89F
推
09/29 14:42, , 90F
09/29 14:42, 90F
推
09/29 16:15, , 91F
09/29 16:15, 91F
→
09/29 16:16, , 92F
09/29 16:16, 92F
→
09/29 16:17, , 93F
09/29 16:17, 93F
→
09/29 16:17, , 94F
09/29 16:17, 94F
→
09/29 16:37, , 95F
09/29 16:37, 95F
→
09/29 16:38, , 96F
09/29 16:38, 96F
→
09/29 17:31, , 97F
09/29 17:31, 97F
→
09/29 17:32, , 98F
09/29 17:32, 98F
→
09/29 17:39, , 99F
09/29 17:39, 99F
推
09/29 17:43, , 100F
09/29 17:43, 100F
推
09/29 17:43, , 101F
09/29 17:43, 101F
→
09/29 17:46, , 102F
09/29 17:46, 102F
推
09/29 18:47, , 103F
09/29 18:47, 103F
推
09/30 03:00, , 104F
09/30 03:00, 104F
→
09/30 03:01, , 105F
09/30 03:01, 105F
→
09/30 03:02, , 106F
09/30 03:02, 106F
→
09/30 03:02, , 107F
09/30 03:02, 107F
推
09/30 10:10, , 108F
09/30 10:10, 108F
→
09/30 10:10, , 109F
09/30 10:10, 109F
→
09/30 10:37, , 110F
09/30 10:37, 110F
→
09/30 10:38, , 111F
09/30 10:38, 111F
→
09/30 10:39, , 112F
09/30 10:39, 112F
→
09/30 20:04, , 113F
09/30 20:04, 113F
→
09/30 20:19, , 114F
09/30 20:19, 114F
推
10/02 22:08, , 115F
10/02 22:08, 115F
→
10/02 22:08, , 116F
10/02 22:08, 116F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):