[討教] 如果楊過有兩條手臂,是否能一人敵五絕?
如果楊過有兩條手臂,就可以同使黯然銷魂掌,每一掌都有如同海嘯的威力,而且雙手同
使,CP時間短,而且有雙臂的話,不會過度傷害手臂的肌肉,威力更巨。
或者同使雙劍,一手玄鐵劍、一手君子劍,每一劍都勁如驚雷閃電,凡人之軀如何能擋?
獨臂楊過以獨臂銷魂掌與金輪法王過招,只要兩百餘招就能擊敗法王,如果能雙手並用,
威力、速度、招式變化豈止倍增,筆者認為甚至五十招內就能擊敗法王。
如果楊過當初有帶玄鐵劍去決戰法王,一手持劍、一掌黯然,只怕三十招之內,法王便要
跪地求饒。
雙臂的楊過,甚至可媲美劍神阿青、與神照經天下無敵的丁典。
如果楊過有雙臂,是否能以一人之力挑戰五絕呢?
郭靖的降龍掌,楊過也學過的,必能窺破降龍掌破綻。
東邪亦如是,彈指神通、玉簫劍法也曾傳授給楊過,其中精妙,楊過亦知。
周伯通更不用說,九陰先不說,一身全真教功夫全被玉女心經剋制。
一燈與東邪、周伯通已是老邁,體力更不及楊過壯年之盛、如日方中。
唯一能與楊過戰到最後的只剩郭靖,但郭靖的內力又怎及楊過如海嘯一般的剛猛掌力?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.120.11.231
※ 編輯: CHINAisGOD 來自: 140.120.11.231 (09/30 15:17)
推
09/30 15:18, , 1F
09/30 15:18, 1F
→
09/30 15:18, , 2F
09/30 15:18, 2F
→
09/30 15:19, , 3F
09/30 15:19, 3F
→
09/30 15:19, , 4F
09/30 15:19, 4F
→
09/30 15:19, , 5F
09/30 15:19, 5F
→
09/30 15:19, , 6F
09/30 15:19, 6F
→
09/30 15:23, , 7F
09/30 15:23, 7F
→
09/30 15:24, , 8F
09/30 15:24, 8F
噓
09/30 15:29, , 9F
09/30 15:29, 9F
→
09/30 15:36, , 10F
09/30 15:36, 10F
→
09/30 15:39, , 11F
09/30 15:39, 11F
噓
09/30 15:42, , 12F
09/30 15:42, 12F
噓
09/30 15:54, , 13F
09/30 15:54, 13F
噓
09/30 15:57, , 14F
09/30 15:57, 14F
噓
09/30 15:57, , 15F
09/30 15:57, 15F
→
09/30 15:58, , 16F
09/30 15:58, 16F
噓
09/30 16:00, , 17F
09/30 16:00, 17F
推
09/30 16:11, , 18F
09/30 16:11, 18F
推
09/30 16:39, , 19F
09/30 16:39, 19F
→
09/30 16:39, , 20F
09/30 16:39, 20F
噓
09/30 16:42, , 21F
09/30 16:42, 21F
噓
09/30 16:45, , 22F
09/30 16:45, 22F
噓
09/30 16:55, , 23F
09/30 16:55, 23F
噓
09/30 17:07, , 24F
09/30 17:07, 24F
→
09/30 17:10, , 25F
09/30 17:10, 25F
→
09/30 17:10, , 26F
09/30 17:10, 26F
噓
09/30 17:15, , 27F
09/30 17:15, 27F
→
09/30 17:16, , 28F
09/30 17:16, 28F
噓
09/30 17:23, , 29F
09/30 17:23, 29F
噓
09/30 17:54, , 30F
09/30 17:54, 30F
噓
09/30 18:01, , 31F
09/30 18:01, 31F
推
09/30 18:14, , 32F
09/30 18:14, 32F
噓
09/30 18:21, , 33F
09/30 18:21, 33F
噓
09/30 19:52, , 34F
09/30 19:52, 34F
噓
09/30 20:16, , 35F
09/30 20:16, 35F
噓
09/30 20:28, , 36F
09/30 20:28, 36F
噓
09/30 20:40, , 37F
09/30 20:40, 37F
噓
09/30 20:45, , 38F
09/30 20:45, 38F
→
09/30 20:46, , 39F
09/30 20:46, 39F
噓
09/30 20:55, , 40F
09/30 20:55, 40F
噓
09/30 21:47, , 41F
09/30 21:47, 41F
噓
09/30 22:52, , 42F
09/30 22:52, 42F
→
09/30 23:27, , 43F
09/30 23:27, 43F
噓
09/30 23:48, , 44F
09/30 23:48, 44F
噓
10/01 00:04, , 45F
10/01 00:04, 45F
推
10/01 00:05, , 46F
10/01 00:05, 46F
噓
10/01 00:44, , 47F
10/01 00:44, 47F
噓
10/01 00:55, , 48F
10/01 00:55, 48F
→
10/01 02:05, , 49F
10/01 02:05, 49F
→
10/01 02:05, , 50F
10/01 02:05, 50F
噓
10/01 07:56, , 51F
10/01 07:56, 51F
噓
10/01 08:45, , 52F
10/01 08:45, 52F
噓
10/01 09:38, , 53F
10/01 09:38, 53F
→
10/01 10:14, , 54F
10/01 10:14, 54F
噓
10/01 10:23, , 55F
10/01 10:23, 55F
→
10/01 10:31, , 56F
10/01 10:31, 56F
噓
10/01 10:44, , 57F
10/01 10:44, 57F
推
10/01 11:32, , 58F
10/01 11:32, 58F
噓
10/01 11:58, , 59F
10/01 11:58, 59F
噓
10/01 18:17, , 60F
10/01 18:17, 60F
噓
10/01 19:45, , 61F
10/01 19:45, 61F
噓
10/01 23:52, , 62F
10/01 23:52, 62F
噓
10/03 01:16, , 63F
10/03 01:16, 63F
→
11/04 09:32, , 64F
11/04 09:32, 64F
→
12/29 01:34,
5年前
, 65F
12/29 01:34, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):