[外絮] Jeremy Lin Could Stumble on '$10MM Per
http://goo.gl/oZd9S8
Jeremy Lin Could Stumble on '$10MM Per Year Problem' This Offseason
Arnel Imperial
May 30, 2015 12:58 PM EDT
Jeremy Lin, who went through an up-and-down year with the Los Angeles
Lakers, needs to take a paycut for his next contract or else it's going
to be a very long offseason for the Asian-American standout.
林書豪,身為一位本季在湖人隊大起大落的球員,下一份合約的薪水有可能下降,
或者這位亞裔運動員將會在休賽季花費相當長的時間來脫穎而出.
After bagging a career-high $15 million base salary last season (the
final year of the three-year, $25 million contract he signed with the
Houston Rockets in 2012), Lin's next contract is estimated to take a
major dip as a result of a forgetful run with the purple-and-gold.
在他生涯最高薪的15M本季走完後(火箭在2012年給的3年25M合約最後一年薪水),
林的下一份合約估計會以跳過淌了整季紙巾軍團渾水的結果來進行.
Although Lin's 2014-15 season numbers (11.1 points & 4.6 assists on 42
percent from the field / 36 percent 3-point line per ESPN Stats) aren't
shabby at all for an NBA point guard, unmet expectations along with his
failure to live up to the hype surrounding his tenure with the Lakers has
somewhat dented his free-agency stock.
雖然Lin在這一季打出的數據(場均11.1分,4.6助,42%命中率與36%三分命中率)在NBA的
控衛中並不糟糕,在湖人失敗且未滿足期待的賽季,會削弱他在自由球員市場的身價.
However, Lakers legend and current NBA analyst Mychal Thompson told ESPN
Radio Los Angeles that he still thinks the 26-year Lin would lobby for an
eight figure per year contract, regardless of what NBA analyst and
executives values him.
然而,湖人傳奇球星,現任的NBA球評湯普森(K湯他爸)在洛杉磯ESPN廣播中,
認為26歲的林書豪會在NBA球團的球探或高層評估中,尋求一份每年8位數的合約.
According sources close to situation, Lin believes his strong performance
after the All-Star break, when he averaged 14.4 points and 5.2 assists per
game in the month of March, only proved that he deserves an $8MM to $10MM
per year contract.
依可靠消息來源指出,林書豪相信他在明星賽週之後到三月間的強力表現,
打出了場均14.4分與5.2助的成績,可以證明他是有資格拿每年8~10M的合約的.
Very messy offseason is in the offing if Lin continues to push for an eight
figure asking price. While there's no doubt Lin is still one of the better
playmakers to hit the free-agency market this summer, his valuation might be
too much over the top to the extent that he may scare away interested teams
and run out of offers in the end. It's a problematic scenario that can only
be averted if he somehow agrees to accept at least $5MM a year deal, which
is the fair valuation of Lin, according to most NBA insiders and GMs.
若林書豪繼續推動八位數的要價,這紊亂的休賽期即將來到.雖然林書豪依然是今年自由
球員市場中更好的進攻組織者之一,這點毫無疑問,但他自估的過高價值可能會嚇跑對他
有興趣的球隊.然而,這也同時以一個有疑問的劇本去避免林書豪莫名其妙地同意接受至
少每年5M的合約 -- 這是來自多數NBA內部人士與制服組所認定的林書豪合理價格.
【結論】1.Lin的經紀人與聯盟的鬥法開始了?
2.聯盟海珊「開個5給他,讓他贏庄家一百塊!」
--
當我們還在擔心小少將會不會帶壞小玉的時候,勿忘雜賀孫市每回定番帶壞小玉的實力!
小玉「原來我和他(男自創子)是《晡巡長*》的交情啊。」(*= 不尋常)
孫市「唉呀唉呀大小姐真是熱情,我也該找找我的真愛啦。」(閃人)
http://i.imgur.com/bFCZOq5.jpg
《戰國無雙4.タダラナヌ~♪期間宣傳簽名檔》
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 210.201.85.9
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Jeremy_Lin/M.1433238092.A.F00.html
推
06/02 17:48, , 1F
06/02 17:48, 1F
推
06/02 17:54, , 2F
06/02 17:54, 2F
推
06/02 17:55, , 3F
06/02 17:55, 3F
→
06/02 17:56, , 4F
06/02 17:56, 4F
→
06/02 18:01, , 5F
06/02 18:01, 5F
→
06/02 18:02, , 6F
06/02 18:02, 6F
推
06/02 18:02, , 7F
06/02 18:02, 7F
→
06/02 18:02, , 8F
06/02 18:02, 8F
→
06/02 18:03, , 9F
06/02 18:03, 9F
→
06/02 18:03, , 10F
06/02 18:03, 10F
→
06/02 18:03, , 11F
06/02 18:03, 11F
→
06/02 18:03, , 12F
06/02 18:03, 12F
→
06/02 18:04, , 13F
06/02 18:04, 13F
→
06/02 18:04, , 14F
06/02 18:04, 14F
→
06/02 18:05, , 15F
06/02 18:05, 15F
推
06/02 18:08, , 16F
06/02 18:08, 16F
→
06/02 18:09, , 17F
06/02 18:09, 17F
→
06/02 18:28, , 18F
06/02 18:28, 18F
推
06/02 19:45, , 19F
06/02 19:45, 19F
推
06/02 20:15, , 20F
06/02 20:15, 20F
推
06/02 20:28, , 21F
06/02 20:28, 21F
→
06/02 20:35, , 22F
06/02 20:35, 22F
→
06/02 20:39, , 23F
06/02 20:39, 23F
→
06/02 20:43, , 24F
06/02 20:43, 24F
→
06/02 20:44, , 25F
06/02 20:44, 25F
推
06/02 21:13, , 26F
06/02 21:13, 26F
推
06/02 21:42, , 27F
06/02 21:42, 27F
→
06/02 21:44, , 28F
06/02 21:44, 28F
→
06/02 21:46, , 29F
06/02 21:46, 29F
→
06/02 21:47, , 30F
06/02 21:47, 30F
推
06/02 21:53, , 31F
06/02 21:53, 31F
推
06/02 22:07, , 32F
06/02 22:07, 32F
推
06/02 22:14, , 33F
06/02 22:14, 33F
推
06/02 22:24, , 34F
06/02 22:24, 34F
→
06/03 00:23, , 35F
06/03 00:23, 35F
→
06/03 00:24, , 36F
06/03 00:24, 36F
→
06/03 00:25, , 37F
06/03 00:25, 37F
→
06/03 00:27, , 38F
06/03 00:27, 38F
→
06/03 00:28, , 39F
06/03 00:28, 39F
推
06/03 00:50, , 40F
06/03 00:50, 40F
推
06/03 07:17, , 41F
06/03 07:17, 41F
→
06/03 07:17, , 42F
06/03 07:17, 42F
→
06/03 09:15, , 43F
06/03 09:15, 43F
→
06/03 09:15, , 44F
06/03 09:15, 44F
推
06/03 10:11, , 45F
06/03 10:11, 45F
→
06/03 10:12, , 46F
06/03 10:12, 46F
→
06/03 10:13, , 47F
06/03 10:13, 47F
→
06/03 10:15, , 48F
06/03 10:15, 48F
→
06/03 10:17, , 49F
06/03 10:17, 49F
→
06/03 10:18, , 50F
06/03 10:18, 50F
推
06/03 10:40, , 51F
06/03 10:40, 51F
→
06/03 10:44, , 52F
06/03 10:44, 52F
→
06/03 12:20, , 53F
06/03 12:20, 53F
→
06/03 12:31, , 54F
06/03 12:31, 54F
推
06/03 13:47, , 55F
06/03 13:47, 55F
→
06/03 13:47, , 56F
06/03 13:47, 56F
→
06/03 13:48, , 57F
06/03 13:48, 57F
→
06/03 13:48, , 58F
06/03 13:48, 58F
→
06/03 13:48, , 59F
06/03 13:48, 59F
→
06/03 13:48, , 60F
06/03 13:48, 60F
→
06/03 13:49, , 61F
06/03 13:49, 61F
→
06/03 13:49, , 62F
06/03 13:49, 62F
推
06/03 13:55, , 63F
06/03 13:55, 63F
推
06/03 14:01, , 64F
06/03 14:01, 64F
推
06/03 14:02, , 65F
06/03 14:02, 65F
推
06/03 14:02, , 66F
06/03 14:02, 66F
推
06/03 14:12, , 67F
06/03 14:12, 67F
推
06/03 14:12, , 68F
06/03 14:12, 68F
推
06/03 14:22, , 69F
06/03 14:22, 69F
推
06/03 14:27, , 70F
06/03 14:27, 70F
推
06/03 14:47, , 71F
06/03 14:47, 71F
推
06/03 15:06, , 72F
06/03 15:06, 72F
推
06/03 16:09, , 73F
06/03 16:09, 73F
推
06/03 23:35, , 74F
06/03 23:35, 74F
→
06/04 00:04, , 75F
06/04 00:04, 75F
推
06/04 00:07, , 76F
06/04 00:07, 76F
→
06/04 00:09, , 77F
06/04 00:09, 77F