[外絮] LA Times對Magic Johnson推特後報導
Magic Johnson suggests Lakers point guard Jeremy Lin should start
by Eric Pincus 10/23/2014
http://www.latimes.com/sports/lakers/lakersnow/la-sp-ln-jeremy-lin-lakers-
start-20141023-story.html
節省時間只翻重點
Jeremy Lin has been one of the Lakers' best players during the preseason,
averaging 10.8 points and 6.0 assists through four games.
Coming off the bench, Lin helped the Lakers overtake the Portland Trail
Blazers on Wednesday, 94-86, while scoring 13 points and dishing five assists.
During the game, Lakers Hall of Famer Magic Johnson tweeted, "Jeremy Lin is
going to be a good starting PG for the Lakers w/ his ability to get in the
lane and create shots for himself & his teammates."
這段說Lin在熱身賽是表現最好球員之一 平均10, 6, Magic Johnson推特...
Johnson, who was a vocal critic of the Lakers' previous coach (Mike
D'Antoni), may be giving a not-so-subtle hint to his former Showtime
backcourt mate, Coach Byron Scott -- Lin should start.
With Steve Nash struggling to get healthy (back), Scott has relied on veteran
point guard Ronnie Price in recent games. Suffering through his own minor
injuries, Lin sat out three exhibition games with a pair of sprained ankles.
An argument can be made for keeping Lin on the second unit, especially with
high-scoring forward/guard Nick Young expected to miss 15 to 20 games with a
thumb injury. Without Young, the Lakers' bench is seriously lacking in
scoring punch, with rookie Julius Randle looking like an All-Star one game,
and like a 19-year-old newbie another.
對丹東尼批評(後來離開)的Johnson給他Showtime的後場搭檔Byron不小的暗示: 林該先
發。
Nash掙扎於傷病,Lin扭傷,Price先發。將林置於第二陣容展生爭議,尤其在Young
將缺陣15-20場比賽時。但沒有Young第二陣容缺少得分點....
With Lin on the floor, the Lakers' second group plays with much greater
purpose. The starters have the firepower with Kobe Bryant on the floor (19.0
points a game through the preseason), Carlos Boozer (12.6), Jordan Hill
(9.5), Price (8.2) and Wesley Johnson (7.7).
Randle is averaging 8.3 points a night, third off the bench to Lin and rookie
Jordan Clarkson (9.0), who has made just three appearances because of a
strained calf.
林在第二陣容讓第二陣容看起來好太多了....
If Nash does return to become the Lakers' regular starter, Lin probably will
continue to lead the second unit. It makes little sense to have the
40-year-old Nash loosen up through warmups, then sit for about 20 minutes
waiting to check in for Lin.
Without Nash, Lin may step into the starting five -- but that may have to
wait until Young returns. Lacking the firepower in Young, or playmaking in
Lin, the second unit would be a disaster with Price. While Price is a
capable, scrappy veteran, he's not going to be a high-volume scorer, or shot
creator for others via penetration.
如果Nash健康那林可以繼續帶替補因為總不能讓40歲的球員坐在場邊20分鐘等被換上場。
沒有Nash,林應該會調到先發,沒有Young的火力和playmaker林,Pirce帶的第二陣容會
看起來像個災難。Price是一個亂鬥型的老將,他不是一個強力得分手也不能為隊友製造
機會,更不能切入。
Through the course of a game, Scott will have plenty of time to mix and
match, playing Lin with the starters, Bryant with the reserves and other
combinations.
While Johnson is not wrong about Lin, he may be the Lakers' second-best
player this season, what's of greater concern than starting is who closes out
games in the fourth quarter.
比賽時仍有很多時間Lin會跟先發搭檔,而Kobe跟替補搭的機會。Johnson是對的,林
會是這季第二好的球員,畢竟林看待第四節關鍵時刻比先發來的重要。
*台詞好熟,被這種台詞騙了一年之後,到底這次......是真是假 = =?
(希望是真的.....那我會很.....高興?)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 184.180.220.229
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Jeremy_Lin/M.1414137758.A.FEA.html
※ 編輯: senaswong (184.180.220.229), 10/24/2014 16:03:56
※ 編輯: senaswong (184.180.220.229), 10/24/2014 16:05:27
推
10/24 16:05, , 1F
10/24 16:05, 1F
推
10/24 16:08, , 2F
10/24 16:08, 2F
噓
10/24 16:09, , 3F
10/24 16:09, 3F
→
10/24 16:09, , 4F
10/24 16:09, 4F
→
10/24 16:09, , 5F
10/24 16:09, 5F
→
10/24 16:09, , 6F
10/24 16:09, 6F
推
10/24 16:09, , 7F
10/24 16:09, 7F
→
10/24 16:09, , 8F
10/24 16:09, 8F
→
10/24 16:10, , 9F
10/24 16:10, 9F
推
10/24 16:12, , 10F
10/24 16:12, 10F
→
10/24 16:13, , 11F
10/24 16:13, 11F
→
10/24 16:13, , 12F
10/24 16:13, 12F
推
10/24 16:13, , 13F
10/24 16:13, 13F
→
10/24 16:14, , 14F
10/24 16:14, 14F
推
10/24 16:17, , 15F
10/24 16:17, 15F
→
10/24 16:17, , 16F
10/24 16:17, 16F
噓
10/24 16:18, , 17F
10/24 16:18, 17F
→
10/24 16:19, , 18F
10/24 16:19, 18F
推
10/24 16:19, , 19F
10/24 16:19, 19F
推
10/24 16:19, , 20F
10/24 16:19, 20F
→
10/24 16:19, , 21F
10/24 16:19, 21F
推
10/24 16:21, , 22F
10/24 16:21, 22F
→
10/24 16:22, , 23F
10/24 16:22, 23F
推
10/24 16:23, , 24F
10/24 16:23, 24F
→
10/24 16:23, , 25F
10/24 16:23, 25F
→
10/24 16:25, , 26F
10/24 16:25, 26F
推
10/24 16:25, , 27F
10/24 16:25, 27F
→
10/24 16:25, , 28F
10/24 16:25, 28F
推
10/24 16:36, , 29F
10/24 16:36, 29F
→
10/24 16:37, , 30F
10/24 16:37, 30F
推
10/24 16:37, , 31F
10/24 16:37, 31F
推
10/24 16:37, , 32F
10/24 16:37, 32F
→
10/24 16:39, , 33F
10/24 16:39, 33F
→
10/24 16:40, , 34F
10/24 16:40, 34F
推
10/24 16:40, , 35F
10/24 16:40, 35F
→
10/24 16:40, , 36F
10/24 16:40, 36F
→
10/24 16:41, , 37F
10/24 16:41, 37F
→
10/24 16:41, , 38F
10/24 16:41, 38F
→
10/24 16:41, , 39F
10/24 16:41, 39F
→
10/24 16:45, , 40F
10/24 16:45, 40F
推
10/24 16:46, , 41F
10/24 16:46, 41F
→
10/24 16:47, , 42F
10/24 16:47, 42F
→
10/24 16:47, , 43F
10/24 16:47, 43F
推
10/24 16:53, , 44F
10/24 16:53, 44F
→
10/24 16:54, , 45F
10/24 16:54, 45F
推
10/24 16:55, , 46F
10/24 16:55, 46F
推
10/24 16:55, , 47F
10/24 16:55, 47F
→
10/24 16:56, , 48F
10/24 16:56, 48F
→
10/24 16:56, , 49F
10/24 16:56, 49F
→
10/24 16:57, , 50F
10/24 16:57, 50F
推
10/24 16:58, , 51F
10/24 16:58, 51F
→
10/24 16:59, , 52F
10/24 16:59, 52F
推
10/24 17:08, , 53F
10/24 17:08, 53F
推
10/24 17:10, , 54F
10/24 17:10, 54F
推
10/24 17:13, , 55F
10/24 17:13, 55F
→
10/24 17:18, , 56F
10/24 17:18, 56F
推
10/24 17:19, , 57F
10/24 17:19, 57F
→
10/24 17:19, , 58F
10/24 17:19, 58F
→
10/24 17:20, , 59F
10/24 17:20, 59F
→
10/24 17:20, , 60F
10/24 17:20, 60F
推
10/24 17:21, , 61F
10/24 17:21, 61F
推
10/24 18:06, , 62F
10/24 18:06, 62F
→
10/24 18:10, , 63F
10/24 18:10, 63F
→
10/24 18:11, , 64F
10/24 18:11, 64F
→
10/24 18:34, , 65F
10/24 18:34, 65F
→
10/24 18:35, , 66F
10/24 18:35, 66F
推
10/24 19:56, , 67F
10/24 19:56, 67F
推
10/24 21:46, , 68F
10/24 21:46, 68F
→
10/24 21:46, , 69F
10/24 21:46, 69F
→
10/24 21:48, , 70F
10/24 21:48, 70F
推
10/24 22:01, , 71F
10/24 22:01, 71F
→
10/24 22:04, , 72F
10/24 22:04, 72F
推
10/24 22:46, , 73F
10/24 22:46, 73F
→
10/24 22:47, , 74F
10/24 22:47, 74F
→
10/24 22:47, , 75F
10/24 22:47, 75F
→
10/24 22:49, , 76F
10/24 22:49, 76F
→
10/24 22:49, , 77F
10/24 22:49, 77F
→
10/24 22:51, , 78F
10/24 22:51, 78F
推
10/24 22:56, , 79F
10/24 22:56, 79F
→
10/24 22:59, , 80F
10/24 22:59, 80F
→
10/24 23:00, , 81F
10/24 23:00, 81F
推
10/24 23:05, , 82F
10/24 23:05, 82F
推
10/24 23:15, , 83F
10/24 23:15, 83F
推
10/24 23:32, , 84F
10/24 23:32, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):