Re: [問題] 小傑的氣量比奇犽多嗎?
※ 引述《cpc21478 (火俊鳥)》之銘言:
: 在G.I時,因為在最後一球,小傑還能比之前幾次攻擊用更多的氣量注入拳頭
: 磊札就說小傑是怪物~還說小傑絕對是金的兒子
: 而奇犽只有被磊札稱讚是中心人物以及資質彌補了經驗的不足,反而沒有被磊札稱為怪物
: 獵人世界是以氣量來看是不是為怪物的依據阿?
: 且奇犽的資質跟小傑是一樣的,1000萬人之中才有1個
: 我就在想奇犽跟小傑哪個人氣的量比較多阿?
: 答案是不是小傑阿? 因為小傑是強化系的 氣量多贏面多就很多?
這個問題可能只有拿酷戮的能力能查得出來
但是有另一個問題
硬只是念能力的應用技,把其他地方的氣阻絕再用凝集中到手上,用練增強
所以應該沒有所謂的制約(同時發動各能力應該不算?變大傑應該也跟硬沒關係?)
只是小傑把它拿來當做絕招
那基本上應該每個人都做得到
但是能不能把"硬"定義為"強化系"的能力就得問富奸了...
如果是的話,那奇犽的氣量即使跟小傑一樣多,也發揮不到100%
可是氣的量也不一定是小傑比較多,像跳高比賽奇犽就贏過小傑
奇犽的能力又要看將"氣"轉化為"電"到底又會消耗多少氣的量
而且奇犽又將它應用成超神速,又要花掉多少的氣?說不定多好幾倍?
(看向隔壁的天鎖斬月)
還有上面有人提到把地板轟掉...
我倒覺得奇犽本來腕力就比小傑強了不少(16噸)
就算只是以念加強一下,這腕力說不定也辦得到?
從比斯吉vs炸彈魔的戰鬥也許可以說明本身的力量在戰鬥中也佔有很大的優勢
最後我是覺得
奇犽的個性就算氣量更多也絕不會用這種正面衝突的硬來主攻
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.249.95.122
推
10/07 22:33, , 1F
10/07 22:33, 1F
→
10/07 22:34, , 2F
10/07 22:34, 2F
推
10/07 22:41, , 3F
10/07 22:41, 3F
→
10/07 22:43, , 4F
10/07 22:43, 4F
→
10/07 22:49, , 5F
10/07 22:49, 5F
→
10/07 22:50, , 6F
10/07 22:50, 6F
推
10/07 22:51, , 7F
10/07 22:51, 7F
推
10/07 22:52, , 8F
10/07 22:52, 8F
→
10/07 22:52, , 9F
10/07 22:52, 9F
推
10/07 22:52, , 10F
10/07 22:52, 10F
→
10/07 22:53, , 11F
10/07 22:53, 11F
→
10/07 22:53, , 12F
10/07 22:53, 12F
→
10/07 22:53, , 13F
10/07 22:53, 13F
→
10/07 22:54, , 14F
10/07 22:54, 14F
→
10/07 22:54, , 15F
10/07 22:54, 15F
→
10/07 22:54, , 16F
10/07 22:54, 16F
→
10/07 22:55, , 17F
10/07 22:55, 17F
→
10/07 22:55, , 18F
10/07 22:55, 18F
→
10/07 22:56, , 19F
10/07 22:56, 19F
推
10/07 22:57, , 20F
10/07 22:57, 20F
→
10/07 22:57, , 21F
10/07 22:57, 21F
→
10/07 22:58, , 22F
10/07 22:58, 22F
推
10/07 23:00, , 23F
10/07 23:00, 23F
推
10/07 23:01, , 24F
10/07 23:01, 24F
→
10/07 23:03, , 25F
10/07 23:03, 25F
→
10/07 23:05, , 26F
10/07 23:05, 26F
推
10/07 23:05, , 27F
10/07 23:05, 27F
→
10/07 23:06, , 28F
10/07 23:06, 28F
→
10/07 23:06, , 29F
10/07 23:06, 29F
→
10/07 23:07, , 30F
10/07 23:07, 30F
→
10/07 23:07, , 31F
10/07 23:07, 31F
→
10/07 23:09, , 32F
10/07 23:09, 32F
推
10/07 23:09, , 33F
10/07 23:09, 33F
推
10/07 23:10, , 34F
10/07 23:10, 34F
→
10/07 23:11, , 35F
10/07 23:11, 35F
→
10/07 23:16, , 36F
10/07 23:16, 36F
→
10/07 23:18, , 37F
10/07 23:18, 37F
推
10/07 23:20, , 38F
10/07 23:20, 38F
推
10/07 23:20, , 39F
10/07 23:20, 39F
→
10/07 23:21, , 40F
10/07 23:21, 40F
→
10/07 23:21, , 41F
10/07 23:21, 41F
→
10/07 23:22, , 42F
10/07 23:22, 42F
→
10/07 23:22, , 43F
10/07 23:22, 43F
→
10/07 23:23, , 44F
10/07 23:23, 44F
→
10/07 23:23, , 45F
10/07 23:23, 45F
推
10/07 23:23, , 46F
10/07 23:23, 46F
→
10/07 23:25, , 47F
10/07 23:25, 47F
推
10/07 23:46, , 48F
10/07 23:46, 48F

→
10/07 23:53, , 49F
10/07 23:53, 49F
→
10/08 00:00, , 50F
10/08 00:00, 50F
→
10/08 00:01, , 51F
10/08 00:01, 51F
→
10/08 00:02, , 52F
10/08 00:02, 52F
→
10/08 00:06, , 53F
10/08 00:06, 53F
推
10/08 00:20, , 54F
10/08 00:20, 54F
→
10/08 00:30, , 55F
10/08 00:30, 55F
→
10/08 00:32, , 56F
10/08 00:32, 56F
→
10/08 00:33, , 57F
10/08 00:33, 57F
→
10/08 00:34, , 58F
10/08 00:34, 58F
→
10/08 00:34, , 59F
10/08 00:34, 59F
→
10/08 00:35, , 60F
10/08 00:35, 60F
→
10/08 00:35, , 61F
10/08 00:35, 61F
→
10/08 00:36, , 62F
10/08 00:36, 62F
→
10/08 00:38, , 63F
10/08 00:38, 63F
推
10/08 00:40, , 64F
10/08 00:40, 64F
→
10/08 00:40, , 65F
10/08 00:40, 65F
→
10/08 00:42, , 66F
10/08 00:42, 66F
→
10/08 00:44, , 67F
10/08 00:44, 67F
→
10/08 00:46, , 68F
10/08 00:46, 68F
推
10/08 00:57, , 69F
10/08 00:57, 69F
→
10/08 01:04, , 70F
10/08 01:04, 70F
推
10/08 10:27, , 71F
10/08 10:27, 71F
→
10/08 10:29, , 72F
10/08 10:29, 72F
推
10/08 19:20, , 73F
10/08 19:20, 73F
→
10/08 19:20, , 74F
10/08 19:20, 74F
→
10/08 19:21, , 75F
10/08 19:21, 75F
→
10/08 19:50, , 76F
10/08 19:50, 76F
→
10/08 19:53, , 77F
10/08 19:53, 77F
→
10/08 19:54, , 78F
10/08 19:54, 78F
→
10/08 19:54, , 79F
10/08 19:54, 79F
→
10/08 19:56, , 80F
10/08 19:56, 80F
→
10/08 19:57, , 81F
10/08 19:57, 81F
→
10/08 19:57, , 82F
10/08 19:57, 82F
→
10/08 19:58, , 83F
10/08 19:58, 83F
推
10/09 00:14, , 84F
10/09 00:14, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)