Re: [閒聊] 狗頭人跟血法差很多嗎?
※ 引述《Turtle100 (龜龜100)》之銘言:
: 如題
: 我沒有血法師
: 於是用2/2/2的狗頭人代替
: 玩起來還蠻像的
: 還+1/+1體質
: 但我朋友說
: 如果沒有血法
: 倒不如塞其他有用卡
: 放狗頭人真是浪費牌庫
: 真假?
以前也覺得這張沒用 體質輸狗頭人跟骰須 那幹嘛放?
但是有一天剛好有1600就想說合個來玩玩看
才知道真的強 強不是強在體質 而是他太泛用了
假設你是法傷為主的牌組 通通都可以塞一張
兩費就有法傷+1超好用的 狗頭人一樣兩費
但是狗頭人放完被解掉什麼都沒有 血法還給你一張牌
同樣的濾牌型的牌組好了 放骰須還是比不上血法
因為他還給你法傷+1
大家都知道蒼蘭龍很不錯 然後血法你可以想成是兩費的蒼蘭龍
就知道他有多OP了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.231.208.153
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Hearthstone/M.1483159505.A.78C.html
推
12/31 12:47, , 1F
12/31 12:47, 1F
推
12/31 12:48, , 2F
12/31 12:48, 2F
→
12/31 12:48, , 3F
12/31 12:48, 3F
蒼蘭龍怎麼會拿來占場 五費下44絕對虧的啊
推
12/31 12:52, , 4F
12/31 12:52, 4F
推
12/31 12:54, , 5F
12/31 12:54, 5F
推
12/31 13:04, , 6F
12/31 13:04, 6F
推
12/31 13:06, , 7F
12/31 13:06, 7F
推
12/31 13:07, , 8F
12/31 13:07, 8F
推
12/31 13:07, , 9F
12/31 13:07, 9F
推
12/31 13:09, , 10F
12/31 13:09, 10F
推
12/31 13:12, , 11F
12/31 13:12, 11F
推
12/31 13:12, , 12F
12/31 13:12, 12F
推
12/31 13:13, , 13F
12/31 13:13, 13F
※ 編輯: iamsheep (36.231.208.153), 12/31/2016 13:16:03
推
12/31 13:16, , 14F
12/31 13:16, 14F
→
12/31 13:19, , 15F
12/31 13:19, 15F
推
12/31 13:22, , 16F
12/31 13:22, 16F
→
12/31 13:23, , 17F
12/31 13:23, 17F
推
12/31 13:24, , 18F
12/31 13:24, 18F
推
12/31 13:26, , 19F
12/31 13:26, 19F
→
12/31 13:26, , 20F
12/31 13:26, 20F
→
12/31 13:27, , 21F
12/31 13:27, 21F
推
12/31 13:28, , 22F
12/31 13:28, 22F
推
12/31 13:29, , 23F
12/31 13:29, 23F
→
12/31 13:29, , 24F
12/31 13:29, 24F
推
12/31 13:33, , 25F
12/31 13:33, 25F
→
12/31 13:39, , 26F
12/31 13:39, 26F
推
12/31 13:40, , 27F
12/31 13:40, 27F
→
12/31 13:42, , 28F
12/31 13:42, 28F
→
12/31 13:43, , 29F
12/31 13:43, 29F
推
12/31 14:45, , 30F
12/31 14:45, 30F
噓
12/31 14:46, , 31F
12/31 14:46, 31F
→
12/31 14:46, , 32F
12/31 14:46, 32F
噓
12/31 14:48, , 33F
12/31 14:48, 33F
→
12/31 14:48, , 34F
12/31 14:48, 34F
推
12/31 14:50, , 35F
12/31 14:50, 35F
推
12/31 14:54, , 36F
12/31 14:54, 36F
→
12/31 14:55, , 37F
12/31 14:55, 37F
還有 27 則推文
噓
12/31 16:40, , 65F
12/31 16:40, 65F
→
12/31 16:40, , 66F
12/31 16:40, 66F
→
12/31 16:40, , 67F
12/31 16:40, 67F
噓
12/31 16:48, , 68F
12/31 16:48, 68F
推
12/31 16:49, , 69F
12/31 16:49, 69F
→
12/31 16:51, , 70F
12/31 16:51, 70F
噓
12/31 16:59, , 71F
12/31 16:59, 71F
推
12/31 17:01, , 72F
12/31 17:01, 72F
推
12/31 17:39, , 73F
12/31 17:39, 73F
→
12/31 17:41, , 74F
12/31 17:41, 74F
噓
12/31 19:24, , 75F
12/31 19:24, 75F
推
12/31 19:35, , 76F
12/31 19:35, 76F
→
12/31 19:39, , 77F
12/31 19:39, 77F
→
12/31 19:41, , 78F
12/31 19:41, 78F
噓
12/31 20:12, , 79F
12/31 20:12, 79F
推
12/31 21:00, , 80F
12/31 21:00, 80F
→
12/31 21:00, , 81F
12/31 21:00, 81F
→
12/31 21:00, , 82F
12/31 21:00, 82F
推
12/31 21:32, , 83F
12/31 21:32, 83F
推
12/31 22:33, , 84F
12/31 22:33, 84F
推
12/31 23:04, , 85F
12/31 23:04, 85F
推
12/31 23:42, , 86F
12/31 23:42, 86F
→
12/31 23:42, , 87F
12/31 23:42, 87F
→
12/31 23:43, , 88F
12/31 23:43, 88F
推
01/01 00:40, , 89F
01/01 00:40, 89F
推
01/01 03:26, , 90F
01/01 03:26, 90F
→
01/01 03:26, , 91F
01/01 03:26, 91F
→
01/01 03:28, , 92F
01/01 03:28, 92F
→
01/01 03:29, , 93F
01/01 03:29, 93F
推
01/01 07:05, , 94F
01/01 07:05, 94F
→
01/01 07:05, , 95F
01/01 07:05, 95F
推
01/01 13:31, , 96F
01/01 13:31, 96F
推
01/01 14:18, , 97F
01/01 14:18, 97F
→
01/01 16:55, , 98F
01/01 16:55, 98F
→
01/01 16:56, , 99F
01/01 16:56, 99F
→
01/01 16:56, , 100F
01/01 16:56, 100F
→
01/01 18:17, , 101F
01/01 18:17, 101F
推
01/02 02:08, , 102F
01/02 02:08, 102F
推
01/02 16:46, , 103F
01/02 16:46, 103F
→
01/02 16:46, , 104F
01/02 16:46, 104F
討論串 (同標題文章)