[問題] 大家好~也是關於巨人術的問題~~
看板Hearthstone作者telluImsorry (Come up to meet you )時間9年前 (2014/12/30 16:26)推噓11(13推 2噓 49→)留言64則, 23人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
大家好,前幾天感謝大家給我提出很多有用的意見~關於巨人術與咆嘯德的選擇
這兩天打下來我發現巨人術對於咆嘯德的抵抗力好像特別弱Q_Q
常常在初期頂多放小殭屍(2/3)出去,但對方也不理會就繼續成長,
然後T4飛龍一下就會被看守者沉默+德魯伊英雄打一滴,
接著場上就會空掉然後飛天魔像(6/4)跟各種5、6費怪跟著來,
巨人術就會疲於解場,然後隨時自然之力+咆嘯到來 死掉Q.Q
怎麼感覺巨人術對咆嘯德抵抗力特別弱ˊ_ˋ?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.105.124.87
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Hearthstone/M.1419927991.A.D46.html
→
12/30 16:27, , 1F
12/30 16:27, 1F
→
12/30 16:27, , 2F
12/30 16:27, 2F
→
12/30 16:28, , 3F
12/30 16:28, 3F
→
12/30 16:28, , 4F
12/30 16:28, 4F
→
12/30 16:28, , 5F
12/30 16:28, 5F
推
12/30 16:29, , 6F
12/30 16:29, 6F
→
12/30 16:30, , 7F
12/30 16:30, 7F
→
12/30 16:30, , 8F
12/30 16:30, 8F
→
12/30 16:30, , 9F
12/30 16:30, 9F
→
12/30 16:30, , 10F
12/30 16:30, 10F
→
12/30 16:30, , 11F
12/30 16:30, 11F
→
12/30 16:30, , 12F
12/30 16:30, 12F
→
12/30 16:31, , 13F
12/30 16:31, 13F
感謝各位大大~
所以飛龍可以不用先上直接巨人給他讓他解不掉把場優穩下來,
巨人術打死聲獵跟咆嘯德都好痛苦 喜歡跟土豪戰打QAQ
※ 編輯: telluImsorry (27.105.124.87), 12/30/2014 16:34:36
→
12/30 16:33, , 14F
12/30 16:33, 14F
→
12/30 16:35, , 15F
12/30 16:35, 15F
→
12/30 16:37, , 16F
12/30 16:37, 16F
推
12/30 16:39, , 17F
12/30 16:39, 17F
→
12/30 16:39, , 18F
12/30 16:39, 18F
→
12/30 16:39, , 19F
12/30 16:39, 19F
→
12/30 16:39, , 20F
12/30 16:39, 20F
→
12/30 16:39, , 21F
12/30 16:39, 21F
→
12/30 16:40, , 22F
12/30 16:40, 22F
→
12/30 16:40, , 23F
12/30 16:40, 23F
→
12/30 16:40, , 24F
12/30 16:40, 24F
→
12/30 16:41, , 25F
12/30 16:41, 25F
→
12/30 17:08, , 26F
12/30 17:08, 26F
→
12/30 17:08, , 27F
12/30 17:08, 27F
→
12/30 17:08, , 28F
12/30 17:08, 28F
→
12/30 17:08, , 29F
12/30 17:08, 29F
推
12/30 17:23, , 30F
12/30 17:23, 30F
→
12/30 17:24, , 31F
12/30 17:24, 31F
推
12/30 17:25, , 32F
12/30 17:25, 32F
推
12/30 17:26, , 33F
12/30 17:26, 33F
→
12/30 17:27, , 34F
12/30 17:27, 34F
噓
12/30 17:31, , 35F
12/30 17:31, 35F
推
12/30 17:35, , 36F
12/30 17:35, 36F
→
12/30 17:39, , 37F
12/30 17:39, 37F
→
12/30 17:51, , 38F
12/30 17:51, 38F
→
12/30 17:51, , 39F
12/30 17:51, 39F
→
12/30 17:51, , 40F
12/30 17:51, 40F
→
12/30 17:57, , 41F
12/30 17:57, 41F
→
12/30 18:00, , 42F
12/30 18:00, 42F
推
12/30 18:09, , 43F
12/30 18:09, 43F
推
12/30 18:16, , 44F
12/30 18:16, 44F
→
12/30 18:17, , 45F
12/30 18:17, 45F
→
12/30 18:18, , 46F
12/30 18:18, 46F
→
12/30 18:18, , 47F
12/30 18:18, 47F
→
12/30 18:19, , 48F
12/30 18:19, 48F
→
12/30 18:57, , 49F
12/30 18:57, 49F
→
12/30 19:03, , 50F
12/30 19:03, 50F
→
12/30 19:03, , 51F
12/30 19:03, 51F
推
12/30 19:10, , 52F
12/30 19:10, 52F
噓
12/30 19:16, , 53F
12/30 19:16, 53F
→
12/30 19:17, , 54F
12/30 19:17, 54F
→
12/30 19:18, , 55F
12/30 19:18, 55F
→
12/30 19:18, , 56F
12/30 19:18, 56F
→
12/30 19:20, , 57F
12/30 19:20, 57F
推
12/30 19:37, , 58F
12/30 19:37, 58F
推
12/30 20:05, , 59F
12/30 20:05, 59F
推
12/30 23:06, , 60F
12/30 23:06, 60F
→
12/30 23:51, , 61F
12/30 23:51, 61F
推
12/31 11:32, , 62F
12/31 11:32, 62F
→
12/31 11:34, , 63F
12/31 11:34, 63F
→
12/31 11:34, , 64F
12/31 11:34, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):