[心得] klipsch x11 根本名過其實…
古力奇心機重,深知耳機界是以價論聲的世界,一開始用高定價賣x11,再來個層層跳水刺激銷量,最終成為眾人力推的cp神機?
很多人以為用79美元買到349美元很划算,以為自己正在"聽349美元的聲音"
卻沒想到他真實的聲音,其實是硬塞在小巧的空間裡,當然整體還是比大賣場的耳機好一些。
但其貧弱的低音,毫無音場可言的聽感,完全是致命傷。
如果單純以市場評價遍優的耳機的價格來衡量 而不論配戴感和那極差的聽診器效應
klipsch x11大概就是
低音為300元等級的耳機
音場為500元等級的耳機
人聲為1000元等級的耳機
樂器為1000元等級的耳機
中音為1500元等級的耳機
高音為2000元等級的耳機
解析為3000元等級的耳機
其白開水毫無特色的表現,更是對不起他的價格,老實x11完全是名過其實的典型代表,如果拿來跟其他2k~3k左右的他牌耳機來評測,很可能會被屌打。
亞洲神人著
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.176.243
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Headphone/M.1486048706.A.A5A.html
推
02/02 23:20, , 1F
02/02 23:20, 1F
推
02/02 23:22, , 2F
02/02 23:22, 2F
→
02/02 23:23, , 3F
02/02 23:23, 3F
→
02/02 23:24, , 4F
02/02 23:24, 4F
推
02/02 23:24, , 5F
02/02 23:24, 5F
→
02/02 23:24, , 6F
02/02 23:24, 6F
→
02/02 23:24, , 7F
02/02 23:24, 7F
推
02/02 23:25, , 8F
02/02 23:25, 8F
推
02/02 23:27, , 9F
02/02 23:27, 9F
推
02/02 23:28, , 10F
02/02 23:28, 10F
→
02/02 23:28, , 11F
02/02 23:28, 11F
推
02/02 23:28, , 12F
02/02 23:28, 12F
→
02/02 23:28, , 13F
02/02 23:28, 13F
推
02/02 23:29, , 14F
02/02 23:29, 14F
→
02/02 23:29, , 15F
02/02 23:29, 15F
→
02/02 23:30, , 16F
02/02 23:30, 16F
推
02/02 23:31, , 17F
02/02 23:31, 17F
→
02/02 23:31, , 18F
02/02 23:31, 18F
推
02/02 23:32, , 19F
02/02 23:32, 19F
噓
02/02 23:34, , 20F
02/02 23:34, 20F
推
02/02 23:34, , 21F
02/02 23:34, 21F
→
02/02 23:34, , 22F
02/02 23:34, 22F
噓
02/02 23:35, , 23F
02/02 23:35, 23F
推
02/02 23:37, , 24F
02/02 23:37, 24F
推
02/02 23:38, , 25F
02/02 23:38, 25F
→
02/02 23:38, , 26F
02/02 23:38, 26F
→
02/02 23:38, , 27F
02/02 23:38, 27F
噓
02/02 23:40, , 28F
02/02 23:40, 28F
→
02/02 23:41, , 29F
02/02 23:41, 29F
推
02/02 23:42, , 30F
02/02 23:42, 30F
→
02/02 23:42, , 31F
02/02 23:42, 31F
噓
02/02 23:43, , 32F
02/02 23:43, 32F
→
02/02 23:43, , 33F
02/02 23:43, 33F
推
02/02 23:46, , 34F
02/02 23:46, 34F
→
02/02 23:46, , 35F
02/02 23:46, 35F
→
02/02 23:47, , 36F
02/02 23:47, 36F
推
02/02 23:48, , 37F
02/02 23:48, 37F
噓
02/02 23:55, , 38F
02/02 23:55, 38F
噓
02/02 23:56, , 39F
02/02 23:56, 39F
還有 69 則推文
推
02/03 09:19, , 109F
02/03 09:19, 109F
噓
02/03 09:26, , 110F
02/03 09:26, 110F
→
02/03 09:26, , 111F
02/03 09:26, 111F
推
02/03 09:32, , 112F
02/03 09:32, 112F
噓
02/03 10:43, , 113F
02/03 10:43, 113F
→
02/03 10:56, , 114F
02/03 10:56, 114F
推
02/03 11:08, , 115F
02/03 11:08, 115F
推
02/03 11:26, , 116F
02/03 11:26, 116F
→
02/03 11:39, , 117F
02/03 11:39, 117F
→
02/03 11:40, , 118F
02/03 11:40, 118F
推
02/03 11:52, , 119F
02/03 11:52, 119F
推
02/03 12:02, , 120F
02/03 12:02, 120F
推
02/03 12:23, , 121F
02/03 12:23, 121F
推
02/03 12:39, , 122F
02/03 12:39, 122F
→
02/03 13:21, , 123F
02/03 13:21, 123F
噓
02/03 13:37, , 124F
02/03 13:37, 124F
噓
02/03 14:27, , 125F
02/03 14:27, 125F
噓
02/03 14:31, , 126F
02/03 14:31, 126F
噓
02/03 14:35, , 127F
02/03 14:35, 127F
推
02/03 14:38, , 128F
02/03 14:38, 128F
噓
02/03 15:00, , 129F
02/03 15:00, 129F
→
02/03 15:19, , 130F
02/03 15:19, 130F
噓
02/03 15:40, , 131F
02/03 15:40, 131F
噓
02/03 16:50, , 132F
02/03 16:50, 132F
噓
02/03 16:52, , 133F
02/03 16:52, 133F
推
02/03 23:39, , 134F
02/03 23:39, 134F
推
02/04 00:10, , 135F
02/04 00:10, 135F
推
02/04 01:18, , 136F
02/04 01:18, 136F
噓
02/04 02:41, , 137F
02/04 02:41, 137F
推
02/04 09:58, , 138F
02/04 09:58, 138F
推
02/04 10:21, , 139F
02/04 10:21, 139F
推
02/04 10:31, , 140F
02/04 10:31, 140F
噓
02/04 21:09, , 141F
02/04 21:09, 141F
→
02/04 21:36, , 142F
02/04 21:36, 142F
噓
02/05 23:00, , 143F
02/05 23:00, 143F
噓
02/06 08:43, , 144F
02/06 08:43, 144F
推
02/06 12:11, , 145F
02/06 12:11, 145F
噓
02/07 11:04, , 146F
02/07 11:04, 146F
推
02/25 21:34, , 147F
02/25 21:34, 147F
噓
08/19 23:16, , 148F
08/19 23:16, 148F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):