[討論] 來討論一下國昌老師的去留
兩派說法
一派說時力就是因為國昌還在,政黨票才投的下去
另一派說只要國昌滾蛋,時力就有我這票。
我自己是覺得反正他也無心在黨務上
比較忙著自己出風頭
對時力的發展來說是弊大於利
而且燈泡媽的政治路線也走出自己的風格了
不是整個時力都得靠咆哮才能有存在感
所以我是比較支持時力長痛不如短痛,把國昌切了
讓他名正言順加入民眾黨也好
他可能比較適合那邊。
大家覺得呢?
時力到底是有國昌加分,還是沒國昌才加分呢?
----
Sent from BePTT on my Samsung SM-A5360
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.133.165.146 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1693758068.A.BA8.html
→
09/04 00:21,
8月前
, 1F
09/04 00:21, 1F
推
09/04 00:21,
8月前
, 2F
09/04 00:21, 2F
→
09/04 00:22,
8月前
, 3F
09/04 00:22, 3F
→
09/04 00:22,
8月前
, 4F
09/04 00:22, 4F
→
09/04 00:23,
8月前
, 5F
09/04 00:23, 5F
→
09/04 00:24,
8月前
, 6F
09/04 00:24, 6F
推
09/04 00:25,
8月前
, 7F
09/04 00:25, 7F
→
09/04 00:27,
8月前
, 8F
09/04 00:27, 8F
→
09/04 00:27,
8月前
, 9F
09/04 00:27, 9F
推
09/04 00:28,
8月前
, 10F
09/04 00:28, 10F
→
09/04 00:28,
8月前
, 11F
09/04 00:28, 11F
→
09/04 00:29,
8月前
, 12F
09/04 00:29, 12F
推
09/04 00:34,
8月前
, 13F
09/04 00:34, 13F
→
09/04 00:44,
8月前
, 14F
09/04 00:44, 14F
推
09/04 00:46,
8月前
, 15F
09/04 00:46, 15F
→
09/04 00:46,
8月前
, 16F
09/04 00:46, 16F
→
09/04 00:47,
8月前
, 17F
09/04 00:47, 17F
→
09/04 00:47,
8月前
, 18F
09/04 00:47, 18F
→
09/04 00:47,
8月前
, 19F
09/04 00:47, 19F
→
09/04 00:48,
8月前
, 20F
09/04 00:48, 20F
推
09/04 00:52,
8月前
, 21F
09/04 00:52, 21F
→
09/04 00:52,
8月前
, 22F
09/04 00:52, 22F
推
09/04 01:17,
8月前
, 23F
09/04 01:17, 23F
→
09/04 01:17,
8月前
, 24F
09/04 01:17, 24F
→
09/04 01:17,
8月前
, 25F
09/04 01:17, 25F
推
09/04 01:25,
8月前
, 26F
09/04 01:25, 26F
→
09/04 01:26,
8月前
, 27F
09/04 01:26, 27F
推
09/04 02:20,
8月前
, 28F
09/04 02:20, 28F
→
09/04 02:21,
8月前
, 29F
09/04 02:21, 29F
推
09/04 04:29,
8月前
, 30F
09/04 04:29, 30F
推
09/04 06:46,
8月前
, 31F
09/04 06:46, 31F
噓
09/04 07:42,
8月前
, 32F
09/04 07:42, 32F
→
09/04 07:42,
8月前
, 33F
09/04 07:42, 33F
推
09/04 09:55,
8月前
, 34F
09/04 09:55, 34F
討論串 (同標題文章)