Re: [討論] FOX報導拜登得票來自自動加票程式漏洞

看板HatePolitics作者longman (林北鄉長退團長退B86T)時間3年前 (2020/11/07 15:12)推噓7(7推 0噓 12→)

留言19則, 5人參與討論串16/17 (看更多)

※ 引述《g9122xj (g9122xj)》之銘言： : ※ 引述《coolbaby (coolbaby)》之銘言 : : ※ 引述《eierom (非)》之銘言： : : : ※ 引述《markban》之銘言： : : : : 剛才朋友貼給我的 : : : : https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1324783531139235841 : : : : FOX新聞報導，有影片 : : : : Robby Starbuck : : : : @robbystarbuck : : : : One Michigan county clerk caught a glitch in tabulation software so th : ey h : : and : : : : counted votes and found the glitch caused 6,000 votes to go to Biden + : : : : Democrats that were meant for Trump and Republicans. 47 MI counties us : ed t : : his : : : : software. All must check now! : : : : 點進去有新聞影片 : : : : 密西根州的程式有重大漏洞 : : : : 拜登可以得到六千票X47次的自動加票 : : : : 看來密西根州要重驗了 : : : : 其他州該不會也= = : : : 這個報導是真的，因為軟體公司本身也有承認 : : : 錯誤說明有貼公告出來，不過比較神奇的是為 : : : 何這個霸克是拜登自動變多川普自動變少，就 : : : 很引人遐想了，總之這個是可以提告的證據之 : : : 一，之後誰當選還很難說 : : Michigan 官方回應 : : https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-93094-544676--,00.html : : False claims from Ronna McDaniel have no merit : : NOVEMBER 6, 2020 : : In response to the false claims made by Republican National Committee chai : rwom : : an Ronna McDaniel, the Michigan Department of State issues the following s : tate : : ments of fact: : : Michigan’s elections were conducted fairly, effectively and transparently : and : : are an accurate reflection of the will of Michigan voters. : : The erroneous reporting of unofficial results from Antrim county was a res : ult : : of accidental error on the part of the Antrim County Clerk. The equipment : and : : software did not malfunction and all ballots were properly tabulated. Howe : ver, : : the clerk accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting : mac : : hine data and report unofficial results. : : Like many counties in Michigan, Antrim County uses the Dominion Voting Sys : tems : : election management system and voting machines (ballot tabulators.) The co : unt : : y receives programming support from Election Source. Tabulators are progra : mmed : : to scan hand marked, paper ballots. When machines are finished scanning th : e b : : allots, the paper ballots are retained and a totals tape showing the numbe : r of : : votes for each candidate in each race is printed from the machine. : : In order to report unofficial results, county clerks use election manageme : nt s : : ystem software to combine the electronic totals from tabulators and submit : a r : : eport of unofficial results. Because the clerk did not update software, ev : en t : : hough the tabulators counted all the ballots correctly, those accurate res : ults : : were not combined properly when the clerk reported unofficial results. : : The correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabula : tor : : totals tape and on the ballots themselves. Even if the error in the report : ed u : : nofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identif : ied : : during the county canvass. Boards of County Canvassers, which are composed : of : : 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans, review the printed totals tape from each ta : bula : : tor during the canvass to verify the reported vote totals are correct. : : The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of us : er h : : uman error. Even when human error occurs, it is caught during county canva : sses. : : It is also completely false that the county had to or will have to hand co : unt : : all their ballots. The ballots were properly counted by the tabulators. Th : e co : : unty had to review the printed tabulator results from each precinct, not e : ach : : individual ballot. : : As with other unofficial results reporting errors, this was an honest mist : ake : : and did not affect any actual vote totals. Election clerks work extremely : hard : : and do their work with integrity. They are human beings, and sometimes mak : e m : : istakes. However, there are many checks and balances that ensure mistakes : can : : be caught and corrected. : : 這個所謂的bug/人為疏失只有影響非正式計票結果，並未影響正式計票。 : : 此外，選票統計審核委員（共和黨與民主黨各兩名）也確認該錯誤並未影響正式總計 : 票結 : : 果。 : : ----- : : Sent from JPTT on my iPad : 這篇的留言高潮什麼啊？一直浮木浮木的 : 就是計票方式的確有問題，所以議員的翻盤是呈現的數字與實際有誤差 : 他們現在說不影響結果有屁用啊 : 當然要修正bug，承認錯誤啊 : 搞的亂七八糟的，不被信任才是正常的好不好？ : 想一下台灣如果發生這種事，肯定沒有任何一個人會相信選務負責人之後的屁話吧？ : 結果現在一堆說浮木浮木的，一堆突然跑進來的智障我也是想問一下4%文組仔，雖然說別人家選總統，誰上都不關我們家的事，結果也大致底定。但4%文組是不是教導一下，在何種情況下，會有一行程式讓加總計算多6000，然後是隨便一個4%理組debug跟測試多了6000測不出來，需要到選前一天再更新，還有可能讓更新不完整散布的？我猜這個bug的function name叫iVoteYou6000()信不信 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.250.124.167 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1604733139.A.33B.html

推

americ

11/07 15:18, 3年前 , 1^F

11/07 15:18, 1^F

→

dog990999

11/07 15:28, 3年前 , 2^F

11/07 15:28, 2^F

推