[討論] 民進黨被柯文哲予取予求的原因?消失
柯最近越來越不掩飾他向中國靠攏的企圖了
從兩岸一家親到世大運旗子、講稿事件
擺明了就是要向中國展示
他是有能力在台灣內部搞定獨派意見的人
而且柯現在市長連任在望
他等於已經在幫自己未來(可能2020 可能2024)鋪路了
只是柯這樣放話衝康民進黨
一堆立委 大老 基層都看不下去
為什麼民進黨還是打算禮讓柯選市長??(柯文哲條款??)
難道只是單純因為不想給國民黨贏嗎?
但現在客觀上看起來 有能力威脅民進黨下一代領導人(賴 龍 燦)總統路的
很明顯是柯而不是KMT(柯現在是台灣政壇中 挑戰2024 戰略位置最佳的人)
對民進黨來說 除非把柯拉進民進黨
不然民進黨跟柯文哲 早晚一戰
現在還要被他吃盡豆腐 予取予求的理由
到底是什麼??
唯一合理的解釋
就是禮讓柯對一個人最有利
那個人就是蔡英文
對蔡英文來說 2024不關她的事
她只想著2020如何連任
而目前最有機會撼動她的對手就是柯文哲
所以就算民進黨其他人跟獨派 再怎麼賭爛柯
但是民進黨中央現在是蔡主政 就必定會想方設法禮讓柯參選
只要柯連任台北市長成功 2020出來挑戰她的機率就大大降低
反過來如果柯2018落選 而且是因為民進黨也派人參選的原因
那柯出來選總統機率就非常高
一來他出師有名 二來他也沒其他選擇了(只剩選總統)
柯P 何等聰明 他當然深知這一點
所以他現在可以步步進逼民進黨 卻仍老神在在
因為在民進黨裡面 最害怕他的人恰好就是黨主席
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.140.38.100
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1505542187.A.54E.html
推
09/16 14:11, , 1F
09/16 14:11, 1F
→
09/16 14:12, , 2F
09/16 14:12, 2F
→
09/16 14:12, , 3F
09/16 14:12, 3F
→
09/16 14:12, , 4F
09/16 14:12, 4F
→
09/16 14:13, , 5F
09/16 14:13, 5F
→
09/16 14:13, , 6F
09/16 14:13, 6F
→
09/16 14:13, , 7F
09/16 14:13, 7F
→
09/16 14:14, , 8F
09/16 14:14, 8F
推
09/16 14:14, , 9F
09/16 14:14, 9F
→
09/16 14:14, , 10F
09/16 14:14, 10F
推
09/16 14:14, , 11F
09/16 14:14, 11F
→
09/16 14:15, , 12F
09/16 14:15, 12F
→
09/16 14:15, , 13F
09/16 14:15, 13F
→
09/16 14:15, , 14F
09/16 14:15, 14F
→
09/16 14:15, , 15F
09/16 14:15, 15F
→
09/16 14:16, , 16F
09/16 14:16, 16F
→
09/16 14:16, , 17F
09/16 14:16, 17F
→
09/16 14:16, , 18F
09/16 14:16, 18F
→
09/16 14:16, , 19F
09/16 14:16, 19F
→
09/16 14:17, , 20F
09/16 14:17, 20F
→
09/16 14:17, , 21F
09/16 14:17, 21F
推
09/16 14:18, , 22F
09/16 14:18, 22F
→
09/16 14:18, , 23F
09/16 14:18, 23F
→
09/16 14:18, , 24F
09/16 14:18, 24F
→
09/16 14:18, , 25F
09/16 14:18, 25F
→
09/16 14:19, , 26F
09/16 14:19, 26F
推
09/16 14:19, , 27F
09/16 14:19, 27F
→
09/16 14:19, , 28F
09/16 14:19, 28F
→
09/16 14:19, , 29F
09/16 14:19, 29F
推
09/16 14:19, , 30F
09/16 14:19, 30F
→
09/16 14:19, , 31F
09/16 14:19, 31F
→
09/16 14:20, , 32F
09/16 14:20, 32F
→
09/16 14:20, , 33F
09/16 14:20, 33F
→
09/16 14:21, , 34F
09/16 14:21, 34F
→
09/16 14:21, , 35F
09/16 14:21, 35F
→
09/16 14:22, , 36F
09/16 14:22, 36F
→
09/16 14:22, , 37F
09/16 14:22, 37F
→
09/16 14:22, , 38F
09/16 14:22, 38F
→
09/16 14:24, , 39F
09/16 14:24, 39F
推
09/16 14:24, , 40F
09/16 14:24, 40F
推
09/16 14:24, , 41F
09/16 14:24, 41F
→
09/16 14:25, , 42F
09/16 14:25, 42F
→
09/16 14:25, , 43F
09/16 14:25, 43F
→
09/16 14:25, , 44F
09/16 14:25, 44F
→
09/16 14:25, , 45F
09/16 14:25, 45F
→
09/16 14:25, , 46F
09/16 14:25, 46F
噓
09/16 14:25, , 47F
09/16 14:25, 47F
→
09/16 14:26, , 48F
09/16 14:26, 48F
→
09/16 14:26, , 49F
09/16 14:26, 49F
→
09/16 14:26, , 50F
09/16 14:26, 50F
→
09/16 14:26, , 51F
09/16 14:26, 51F
→
09/16 14:26, , 52F
09/16 14:26, 52F
→
09/16 14:27, , 53F
09/16 14:27, 53F
→
09/16 14:27, , 54F
09/16 14:27, 54F
→
09/16 14:28, , 55F
09/16 14:28, 55F
推
09/16 14:32, , 56F
09/16 14:32, 56F
→
09/16 14:33, , 57F
09/16 14:33, 57F
→
09/16 14:33, , 58F
09/16 14:33, 58F
→
09/16 14:33, , 59F
09/16 14:33, 59F
推
09/16 14:36, , 60F
09/16 14:36, 60F
→
09/16 14:37, , 61F
09/16 14:37, 61F
→
09/16 15:06, , 62F
09/16 15:06, 62F
→
09/16 15:07, , 63F
09/16 15:07, 63F
→
09/16 15:22, , 64F
09/16 15:22, 64F
推
09/16 16:14, , 65F
09/16 16:14, 65F
推
09/16 16:36, , 66F
09/16 16:36, 66F
→
09/16 19:28, , 67F
09/16 19:28, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 8 篇):