[討論] 風向帶很大的兩例將造成中小企業大量倒閉消失
這句話最早我是從大濕在人渣fb留言看到的
看到的時候我差點嚇死了 原來dpp這麼用心良苦跟勞工一起與薄利企業共體時艱
剛剛看八卦版爆文又看到一樣的話
原來dpp原本想推兩例後來不知道哪邊看到資料所以才變一粒一休
真是嚇死我這柯粉了 不知道賴在台北這麼用力的取締有沒有讓什麼公司倒了
不知道各位是怎麼想這件事情的
想到大濕當時還留言說了一句讓我有點懷疑我的邏輯是不是有問題的話
『不能說他們沒競爭力,是他們本來就是非常微利的傳統製造業、服務業。』
薄利=/=沒有競爭力
原諒我真的無法體諒dpp的難處 因為我的邏輯真的不太好....
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.45.72.84
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1467651582.A.864.html
推
07/05 01:02, , 1F
07/05 01:02, 1F
→
07/05 01:03, , 2F
07/05 01:03, 2F
推
07/05 01:03, , 3F
07/05 01:03, 3F
推
07/05 01:03, , 4F
07/05 01:03, 4F
→
07/05 01:04, , 5F
07/05 01:04, 5F
→
07/05 01:04, , 6F
07/05 01:04, 6F
推
07/05 01:05, , 7F
07/05 01:05, 7F
→
07/05 01:05, , 8F
07/05 01:05, 8F
→
07/05 01:05, , 9F
07/05 01:05, 9F
→
07/05 01:05, , 10F
07/05 01:05, 10F
→
07/05 01:06, , 11F
07/05 01:06, 11F
→
07/05 01:06, , 12F
07/05 01:06, 12F
→
07/05 01:06, , 13F
07/05 01:06, 13F
→
07/05 01:07, , 14F
07/05 01:07, 14F
推
07/05 01:07, , 15F
07/05 01:07, 15F
→
07/05 01:07, , 16F
07/05 01:07, 16F
推
07/05 01:08, , 17F
07/05 01:08, 17F
→
07/05 01:08, , 18F
07/05 01:08, 18F
推
07/05 01:09, , 19F
07/05 01:09, 19F
推
07/05 01:10, , 20F
07/05 01:10, 20F
推
07/05 01:10, , 21F
07/05 01:10, 21F
→
07/05 01:10, , 22F
07/05 01:10, 22F
→
07/05 01:11, , 23F
07/05 01:11, 23F
→
07/05 01:11, , 24F
07/05 01:11, 24F
→
07/05 01:11, , 25F
07/05 01:11, 25F
推
07/05 01:11, , 26F
07/05 01:11, 26F
→
07/05 01:11, , 27F
07/05 01:11, 27F
推
07/05 01:12, , 28F
07/05 01:12, 28F
→
07/05 01:12, , 29F
07/05 01:12, 29F
→
07/05 01:13, , 30F
07/05 01:13, 30F
→
07/05 01:13, , 31F
07/05 01:13, 31F
→
07/05 01:13, , 32F
07/05 01:13, 32F
推
07/05 01:13, , 33F
07/05 01:13, 33F
→
07/05 01:14, , 34F
07/05 01:14, 34F
→
07/05 01:14, , 35F
07/05 01:14, 35F
推
07/05 01:14, , 36F
07/05 01:14, 36F
→
07/05 01:14, , 37F
07/05 01:14, 37F
→
07/05 01:15, , 38F
07/05 01:15, 38F
→
07/05 01:15, , 39F
07/05 01:15, 39F
→
07/05 01:15, , 40F
07/05 01:15, 40F
→
07/05 01:15, , 41F
07/05 01:15, 41F
推
07/05 01:16, , 42F
07/05 01:16, 42F
→
07/05 01:16, , 43F
07/05 01:16, 43F
→
07/05 01:16, , 44F
07/05 01:16, 44F
→
07/05 01:16, , 45F
07/05 01:16, 45F
→
07/05 01:16, , 46F
07/05 01:16, 46F
→
07/05 01:16, , 47F
07/05 01:16, 47F
→
07/05 01:17, , 48F
07/05 01:17, 48F
推
07/05 01:19, , 49F
07/05 01:19, 49F
→
07/05 01:20, , 50F
07/05 01:20, 50F
→
07/05 01:21, , 51F
07/05 01:21, 51F
推
07/05 01:49, , 52F
07/05 01:49, 52F
→
07/05 01:49, , 53F
07/05 01:49, 53F
→
07/05 01:53, , 54F
07/05 01:53, 54F
→
07/05 02:22, , 55F
07/05 02:22, 55F
推
07/05 02:54, , 56F
07/05 02:54, 56F
噓
07/05 02:58, , 57F
07/05 02:58, 57F
→
07/05 02:58, , 58F
07/05 02:58, 58F
→
07/05 03:00, , 59F
07/05 03:00, 59F
→
07/05 03:01, , 60F
07/05 03:01, 60F
→
07/05 03:02, , 61F
07/05 03:02, 61F
→
07/05 03:02, , 62F
07/05 03:02, 62F
→
07/05 03:03, , 63F
07/05 03:03, 63F
→
07/05 03:04, , 64F
07/05 03:04, 64F
→
07/05 03:05, , 65F
07/05 03:05, 65F
→
07/05 03:05, , 66F
07/05 03:05, 66F
推
07/05 05:54, , 67F
07/05 05:54, 67F
→
07/05 05:55, , 68F
07/05 05:55, 68F
推
07/05 07:03, , 69F
07/05 07:03, 69F
→
07/05 07:27, , 70F
07/05 07:27, 70F
推
07/05 08:18, , 71F
07/05 08:18, 71F
→
07/05 08:40, , 72F
07/05 08:40, 72F
→
07/05 08:40, , 73F
07/05 08:40, 73F
→
07/05 08:40, , 74F
07/05 08:40, 74F
→
07/05 08:40, , 75F
07/05 08:40, 75F
→
07/05 08:42, , 76F
07/05 08:42, 76F
推
07/05 10:29, , 77F
07/05 10:29, 77F
→
07/05 10:30, , 78F
07/05 10:30, 78F
→
07/05 10:30, , 79F
07/05 10:30, 79F
噓
07/05 10:54, , 80F
07/05 10:54, 80F
推
07/05 12:18, , 81F
07/05 12:18, 81F
→
07/05 12:18, , 82F
07/05 12:18, 82F
推
07/05 16:44, , 83F
07/05 16:44, 83F
推
07/05 21:34, , 84F
07/05 21:34, 84F
→
07/05 21:34, , 85F
07/05 21:34, 85F
→
07/05 21:35, , 86F
07/05 21:35, 86F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 10 篇):