Re: [討論] 蔡英文為什麼這麼快就黑掉了消失
去數一數有多少爆
是發P幣帶風向的
基本上只能說國民黨的網工進步了
二例當然好
但是每天進步一點點
每次執政進步一點點
否則既得利益反撲的成本過於鉅大
最後合算之後不見得是利
台灣社會也需要一點點緩衝
畢竟台灣中小企業多
再過一段時間 等大家習慣了
再來進步
別忘了 馬英九就是經濟沒搞好
右派還是有它的基本道理
否則我們這世界就是共產主義勝利了
但事實不是如此
左右還是需要一點平衡
我們應該是要求加強勞檢
而不是被帶風向
好像一休一例是比以前退步似的
明明考的比馬英九好
被帶風向成功就是馬氏復辟了
這成何道理
考得好的反而被下台 這不是道理
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.109.182
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1467295026.A.435.html
噓
06/30 21:58, , 1F
06/30 21:58, 1F
推
06/30 22:00, , 2F
06/30 22:00, 2F
噓
06/30 22:00, , 3F
06/30 22:00, 3F
→
06/30 22:00, , 4F
06/30 22:00, 4F
→
06/30 22:01, , 5F
06/30 22:01, 5F
推
06/30 22:01, , 6F
06/30 22:01, 6F
→
06/30 22:02, , 7F
06/30 22:02, 7F
→
06/30 22:04, , 8F
06/30 22:04, 8F
真的很奇怪
我記得對岸中國人最愛貼圖黨了
推
06/30 22:12, , 9F
06/30 22:12, 9F
→
06/30 22:12, , 10F
06/30 22:12, 10F
→
06/30 22:12, , 11F
06/30 22:12, 11F
※ 編輯: chal (122.116.109.182), 06/30/2016 22:13:13
→
06/30 22:13, , 12F
06/30 22:13, 12F
推
06/30 22:14, , 13F
06/30 22:14, 13F
→
06/30 22:14, , 14F
06/30 22:14, 14F
→
06/30 22:15, , 15F
06/30 22:15, 15F
推
06/30 22:16, , 16F
06/30 22:16, 16F
→
06/30 22:16, , 17F
06/30 22:16, 17F
→
06/30 22:16, , 18F
06/30 22:16, 18F
推
06/30 22:24, , 19F
06/30 22:24, 19F
推
06/30 22:25, , 20F
06/30 22:25, 20F
→
06/30 22:25, , 21F
06/30 22:25, 21F
推
06/30 22:26, , 22F
06/30 22:26, 22F
→
06/30 22:26, , 23F
06/30 22:26, 23F
→
06/30 22:26, , 24F
06/30 22:26, 24F
→
06/30 22:28, , 25F
06/30 22:28, 25F
→
06/30 22:28, , 26F
06/30 22:28, 26F
→
06/30 22:28, , 27F
06/30 22:28, 27F
→
06/30 22:28, , 28F
06/30 22:28, 28F
→
06/30 22:28, , 29F
06/30 22:28, 29F
→
06/30 22:29, , 30F
06/30 22:29, 30F
→
06/30 22:29, , 31F
06/30 22:29, 31F
→
06/30 22:31, , 32F
06/30 22:31, 32F
→
06/30 22:31, , 33F
06/30 22:31, 33F
→
06/30 22:31, , 34F
06/30 22:31, 34F
→
06/30 22:31, , 35F
06/30 22:31, 35F
→
06/30 22:32, , 36F
06/30 22:32, 36F
→
06/30 22:32, , 37F
06/30 22:32, 37F
→
06/30 22:32, , 38F
06/30 22:32, 38F
→
06/30 22:32, , 39F
06/30 22:32, 39F
→
06/30 22:32, , 40F
06/30 22:32, 40F
所以現在是假爭二休之名 行爭勞檢之實嗎
要勞檢就該推勞檢 而不是模糊焦點在二例或一休一例
※ 編輯: chal (122.116.109.182), 06/30/2016 22:35:01
推
06/30 22:33, , 41F
06/30 22:33, 41F
→
06/30 22:33, , 42F
06/30 22:33, 42F
→
06/30 22:34, , 43F
06/30 22:34, 43F
→
06/30 22:34, , 44F
06/30 22:34, 44F
→
06/30 22:35, , 45F
06/30 22:35, 45F
→
06/30 22:36, , 46F
06/30 22:36, 46F
→
06/30 22:36, , 47F
06/30 22:36, 47F
→
06/30 22:37, , 48F
06/30 22:37, 48F
→
06/30 22:37, , 49F
06/30 22:37, 49F
→
06/30 22:37, , 50F
06/30 22:37, 50F
→
06/30 22:38, , 51F
06/30 22:38, 51F
→
06/30 22:39, , 52F
06/30 22:39, 52F
→
06/30 22:39, , 53F
06/30 22:39, 53F
→
06/30 22:40, , 54F
06/30 22:40, 54F
→
06/30 22:40, , 55F
06/30 22:40, 55F
→
06/30 22:41, , 56F
06/30 22:41, 56F
這民調應該是很多人搞不清楚細節下做的吧
你問一個星期可以休二天 我相信絕大多數人都會說好的
→
06/30 22:41, , 57F
06/30 22:41, 57F
※ 編輯: chal (122.116.109.182), 06/30/2016 22:43:06
推
06/30 22:44, , 58F
06/30 22:44, 58F
→
06/30 22:44, , 59F
06/30 22:44, 59F
→
06/30 22:44, , 60F
06/30 22:44, 60F
推
06/30 22:46, , 61F
06/30 22:46, 61F
→
06/30 22:46, , 62F
06/30 22:46, 62F
→
06/30 22:47, , 63F
06/30 22:47, 63F
→
06/30 22:47, , 64F
06/30 22:47, 64F
噓
06/30 22:53, , 65F
06/30 22:53, 65F
噓
06/30 23:47, , 66F
06/30 23:47, 66F
→
06/30 23:51, , 67F
06/30 23:51, 67F
→
06/30 23:53, , 68F
06/30 23:53, 68F
→
06/30 23:53, , 69F
06/30 23:53, 69F
→
06/30 23:54, , 70F
06/30 23:54, 70F
→
06/30 23:54, , 71F
06/30 23:54, 71F
推
07/01 00:23, , 72F
07/01 00:23, 72F
→
07/01 00:24, , 73F
07/01 00:24, 73F
噓
07/01 00:31, , 74F
07/01 00:31, 74F
→
07/01 00:32, , 75F
07/01 00:32, 75F
→
07/01 00:32, , 76F
07/01 00:32, 76F
噓
07/01 00:41, , 77F
07/01 00:41, 77F
→
07/01 00:41, , 78F
07/01 00:41, 78F
→
07/01 00:42, , 79F
07/01 00:42, 79F
噓
07/01 00:44, , 80F
07/01 00:44, 80F
推
07/01 09:23, , 81F
07/01 09:23, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 6 篇):