[新聞] 柯政惹民怨!柯P砍老屋健檢預算 市民罵消失
www.setn.com/m/news.aspx?newsid=124389
台南強震造成建物倒塌,災後中央將擴大老屋健檢、耐震性能評估計畫,台北市2013年開
始曾經免費提供500多棟老屋健檢,今年卻沒有編列補助預算。民眾怒罵,柯市府省過頭
了,什麼錢都能省,但是安全絕對不能省。
原本郝龍斌時代,北市府免費提供老屋健檢。2013年200件申請案,2014年更高達370件,
但2015年柯文哲上任後預算大幅縮減,只提供50件健檢,今年則是連預算都沒有,但北市
超過20年屋齡的多達10萬棟。民眾大罵柯市長亂省錢。民眾:「什麼都能省,安全不能省
」里長:「應該要恢復。」
ps.柯文哲編列史上最高12億第二預備金,卻無預警停辦老屋健檢政策,請問錢真的有花
在刀口上嗎?還是全成了柯文哲貪污的小金庫呢?
另外請柯文哲施政能尊重專業,不要用個人思考不需要就擅自取消
如.警察全面退出校園,不久發生割喉案
如.停辦老屋建檢,就發生大地震
政策不是你柯文哲認為沒用就可以停的
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.205.142.78
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1455622374.A.23B.html
推
02/16 19:38, , 1F
02/16 19:38, 1F
噓
02/16 19:38, , 2F
02/16 19:38, 2F
噓
02/16 19:42, , 3F
02/16 19:42, 3F
噓
02/16 19:43, , 4F
02/16 19:43, 4F
→
02/16 19:43, , 5F
02/16 19:43, 5F
推
02/16 19:44, , 6F
02/16 19:44, 6F
推
02/16 19:44, , 7F
02/16 19:44, 7F
→
02/16 19:45, , 8F
02/16 19:45, 8F
推
02/16 19:46, , 9F
02/16 19:46, 9F
噓
02/16 19:48, , 10F
02/16 19:48, 10F
→
02/16 19:48, , 11F
02/16 19:48, 11F
噓
02/16 19:48, , 12F
02/16 19:48, 12F
→
02/16 19:49, , 13F
02/16 19:49, 13F
噓
02/16 19:50, , 14F
02/16 19:50, 14F
→
02/16 19:51, , 15F
02/16 19:51, 15F
→
02/16 19:52, , 16F
02/16 19:52, 16F
噓
02/16 19:52, , 17F
02/16 19:52, 17F
→
02/16 19:53, , 18F
02/16 19:53, 18F
→
02/16 19:53, , 19F
02/16 19:53, 19F
噓
02/16 19:53, , 20F
02/16 19:53, 20F
→
02/16 19:53, , 21F
02/16 19:53, 21F
→
02/16 19:54, , 22F
02/16 19:54, 22F
→
02/16 19:55, , 23F
02/16 19:55, 23F
噓
02/16 19:56, , 24F
02/16 19:56, 24F
噓
02/16 19:58, , 25F
02/16 19:58, 25F
噓
02/16 20:01, , 26F
02/16 20:01, 26F
噓
02/16 20:03, , 27F
02/16 20:03, 27F
→
02/16 20:03, , 28F
02/16 20:03, 28F
噓
02/16 20:06, , 29F
02/16 20:06, 29F
推
02/16 20:12, , 30F
02/16 20:12, 30F
→
02/16 20:12, , 31F
02/16 20:12, 31F
噓
02/16 20:16, , 32F
02/16 20:16, 32F
→
02/16 20:17, , 33F
02/16 20:17, 33F
→
02/16 20:17, , 34F
02/16 20:17, 34F
噓
02/16 20:25, , 35F
02/16 20:25, 35F
→
02/16 20:32, , 36F
02/16 20:32, 36F
→
02/16 20:33, , 37F
02/16 20:33, 37F
→
02/16 20:34, , 38F
02/16 20:34, 38F
→
02/16 20:34, , 39F
02/16 20:34, 39F
→
02/16 20:36, , 40F
02/16 20:36, 40F
→
02/16 20:36, , 41F
02/16 20:36, 41F
噓
02/16 20:38, , 42F
02/16 20:38, 42F
→
02/16 20:45, , 43F
02/16 20:45, 43F
噓
02/16 21:27, , 44F
02/16 21:27, 44F
→
02/16 21:27, , 45F
02/16 21:27, 45F
噓
02/16 21:52, , 46F
02/16 21:52, 46F
→
02/16 22:02, , 47F
02/16 22:02, 47F
→
02/16 22:02, , 48F
02/16 22:02, 48F
噓
02/16 22:17, , 49F
02/16 22:17, 49F
推
02/16 23:14, , 50F
02/16 23:14, 50F
噓
02/17 00:29, , 51F
02/17 00:29, 51F
噓
02/17 00:40, , 52F
02/17 00:40, 52F
噓
02/17 10:16, , 53F
02/17 10:16, 53F
噓
02/17 12:45, , 54F
02/17 12:45, 54F
→
02/19 17:08, , 55F
02/19 17:08, 55F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):