[討論] 蔡其昌的選區誰來接?消失
DPP正副議長中立化
看來蔡其昌下一任轉不分區 不然就是 台中市長
那海線誰要去接?
好可惜喔 論述能力這麼強的人
以後也沒機會看他上政論節目了...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.254.51.219
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1454336787.A.761.html
推
02/01 22:28, , 1F
02/01 22:28, 1F
推
02/01 22:32, , 2F
02/01 22:32, 2F
→
02/01 22:33, , 3F
02/01 22:33, 3F
推
02/01 22:33, , 4F
02/01 22:33, 4F
推
02/01 22:35, , 5F
02/01 22:35, 5F
推
02/01 22:36, , 6F
02/01 22:36, 6F
推
02/01 22:36, , 7F
02/01 22:36, 7F
推
02/01 22:37, , 8F
02/01 22:37, 8F
推
02/01 22:40, , 9F
02/01 22:40, 9F
→
02/01 22:41, , 10F
02/01 22:41, 10F
→
02/01 22:42, , 11F
02/01 22:42, 11F
→
02/01 22:42, , 12F
02/01 22:42, 12F
派系很多政黨都有阿 日本自民黨也是 共和黨也有茶黨
越打壓或獨厚某派 都不是很好的做法
不過蔡英文的強項 就是做權力"分配" 小英不是示範過給你看了嗎?
※ 編輯: Yolosnow (111.254.51.219), 02/01/2016 22:46:47
推
02/01 22:43, , 13F
02/01 22:43, 13F
推
02/01 22:44, , 14F
02/01 22:44, 14F
→
02/01 22:44, , 15F
02/01 22:44, 15F
→
02/01 22:44, , 16F
02/01 22:44, 16F
→
02/01 22:46, , 17F
02/01 22:46, 17F
推
02/01 22:46, , 18F
02/01 22:46, 18F
推
02/01 22:46, , 19F
02/01 22:46, 19F
我覺得倒不如做好權力分配 才是最好的做好
※ 編輯: Yolosnow (111.254.51.219), 02/01/2016 22:47:48
→
02/01 22:48, , 20F
02/01 22:48, 20F
推
02/01 22:49, , 21F
02/01 22:49, 21F
→
02/01 22:49, , 22F
02/01 22:49, 22F
感謝a大 剛好舉例 把泛綠或者反kmt最大化才是最重要的
※ 編輯: Yolosnow (111.254.51.219), 02/01/2016 22:50:31
推
02/01 22:54, , 23F
02/01 22:54, 23F
→
02/01 22:55, , 24F
02/01 22:55, 24F
→
02/01 22:56, , 25F
02/01 22:56, 25F
→
02/01 22:56, , 26F
02/01 22:56, 26F
→
02/01 23:04, , 27F
02/01 23:04, 27F
推
02/01 23:17, , 28F
02/01 23:17, 28F
推
02/01 23:44, , 29F
02/01 23:44, 29F
推
02/02 00:26, , 30F
02/02 00:26, 30F
推
02/02 00:27, , 31F
02/02 00:27, 31F
→
02/02 00:28, , 32F
02/02 00:28, 32F
推
02/02 00:31, , 33F
02/02 00:31, 33F
→
02/02 00:39, , 34F
02/02 00:39, 34F
推
02/02 00:50, , 35F
02/02 00:50, 35F
→
02/02 00:56, , 36F
02/02 00:56, 36F
→
02/02 00:57, , 37F
02/02 00:57, 37F
→
02/02 00:58, , 38F
02/02 00:58, 38F
→
02/02 02:18, , 39F
02/02 02:18, 39F
推
02/02 10:50, , 40F
02/02 10:50, 40F
→
02/02 10:50, , 41F
02/02 10:50, 41F
→
02/02 10:51, , 42F
02/02 10:51, 42F
→
02/02 10:52, , 43F
02/02 10:52, 43F
→
02/02 10:53, , 44F
02/02 10:53, 44F
→
02/02 10:54, , 45F
02/02 10:54, 45F
→
02/02 12:00, , 46F
02/02 12:00, 46F
推
02/02 12:29, , 47F
02/02 12:29, 47F
→
02/02 12:29, , 48F
02/02 12:29, 48F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
22
48