Re: [分享] Why GW2 might not be the MMO for you
做為英文的翻譯練習，把 M 板友略過的部份也補上了。
Why GW2 might not be the MMO for you.
為什麼 GW2 可能不是適合你的網路遊戲
MMO = massively multiplayer online (大型多人線上遊戲) 以下簡稱多人網路遊戲
Heaps of people have been complaining about the lack of endgame, the
excessive grind(*), the not excessive enough grind, and everything else in
between.
很多人抱怨這個遊戲封頂之後沒事可做、重覆的任務太多或太少，和其他介於之間
的問題。
(*註：grind 在遊戲方面的註解是 the process of engaging in repetitive tasks
反覆進行同個任務的過程。)
It's easy to discount these opinions when you're a fan of the game, but the
reality is this mentality is part of the MMO culture and for some gamers it
is a prerequisite of any MMO.
如果你喜歡這個遊戲，你可以很容易地忽略這些意見。但事實是，這樣的心態是多人
網路遊戲文化的一部份，甚至對某些玩家來說，這是任何遊戲被稱為 "多人網路遊戲"
的先決條件。
Traditionally, MMO's have used skinner box(*) psychology to keep players
busy in their games. This is often manifested as a gear(**) treadmill, where
you are always aspiring to reach a certain goal but that goal is continually
shifted further and further out. This is end game as most players know it.
傳統上，多人網路遊戲利用 skinner box 的心理來保持玩家在遊戲裡的忙碌狀態。
這種機制通常設計成 "裝備跑步機" ：當你渴望達到某個目標的時候，這個目標同時
也持續往更遠的地方移動。這是大部份玩家所知道的 "封頂 (end game)" 。
(*skinner box 指的是一個動物行為測試，當實驗大白鼠對特定刺激做出正確的反應
時，就能得到食物或其他的獎勵，但當它做出不正確的反應時，會得到懲罰。
延伸到遊戲方面，指的是利用運作複雜的時間表來強化對重覆動作的獎勵。)
(**gear 除了齒輪之外也有裝備的意思)
The logic behind this is clear and financially motivated. MMO's are
traditionally a subscription based model so the burden is on the
publisher/developer to sustain a playerbase that will perpetually pay their
monthly subscription.
隱藏在這種邏輯背後的是明顯的財務動機。多人線上遊戲傳統上依靠的收入來自玩
家定期支付的費用，因此遊戲發行者和開發者面對的問題是如何使一定數目的玩家願
意持續支付每個月的遊戲費用。
The side effects of this model are readily apparent: the developer is forced
to neuter difficulty in an attempt to make the game more accessible to
casuals (the widest consumer base), and must constantly reinforce the need to
keep raiding/pvping through rewards. Without those rewards in place the
skinner box model falls apart.
這個模式的副作用是顯而易見的：遊戲的開發者被迫降低難度以迎合消費族群中最廣
大的非職業玩家，同時也必需持續地增加副本和PVP的獎勵以加強玩家的動機。如果
沒有這些獎勵，skinner box 的模式也就不存在了。
I believe this is the crux of why some people take issue with GW2. Arenanet
has released a game that challenges all of these concepts. GW2 is an
intrinsically rewarding game, meaning the enjoyment is meant to come from
playing the game itself.
我相信這是有些人認為 GW2 有問題的癥結所在。Arenanet發行了一款挑戰這些概念
的遊戲，而 GW2 是一款 "以本質做為獎勵" 的遊戲，這表示遊戲的樂趣來自 "玩遊戲"
本身。
(以上這段板友翻譯得比較順暢)
Think about games like Counter-Strike, Battlefield 3, DoTA, and StarCraft. As
you invest more time playing each of those games you become a better player.
That's pretty much it. They focus on your skill improvement as a means to
enduring entertainment. They do not make a grind necessary nor do you gain
permanent character improvements that set you apart from your competitors.
They are intrinsically rewarding.
想想 CS, BF3, DoTA, 和 SC，你在這些遊戲上花更多的時間讓你變成技術更好的玩家，
也差不多就是這樣了，它們的重點在於提升玩家的技術以提供更長久的娛樂，重覆的任
務或動作不是必須的，也不會給玩家的角色帶來任何能夠優於對手的永久改變，這些都
是以遊戲本質做為獎勵的遊戲。
Contrast that with your average MMO and you find a system that isn't
intrinsically rewarding. End game typically consists of new raid encounters
with a new carrot dangling from that stick: shiny new gear. The gear will
become a prerequisite for the next tier so you're going to need to get it
all. The new challenges are exciting for the first week or so, particularly
for guilds that get ranked kills but then turn into mindlessly farming the
same content until the entire guild is geared up.
做為對比的是一般的多人線上遊戲和其他遊戲本質不是獎勵的系統。封頂之後通常包
含了新的副本以及新的胡蘿蔔：閃亮的新裝備；這些裝備通常會變成進到下個挑戰的
先決條件，所以玩家需要得到所有的新裝。這些新的挑戰在第一個星期左右很新奇，
尤其是那些拿到首殺的公會，但接下來這些挑戰會轉變成無腦的農裝，一直到所有的
公會成員都拿到新的裝備為止。
As soon as that's done, it's time to rinse and repeat. This style of play
means the game is forcing motivation upon you. You are often playing not for
the virtue of enjoyment itself but to remain relevant as the goal post
continues to shift. Your previous time investment becomes a reason to not
quit.
當換裝的動作完成之後，接下來又會出現新的副本重覆同樣的過程，這種遊玩的形式
代表遊戲強迫玩家維持對遊戲的動機。玩家常常不是因為享受遊戲本身而玩，而是為
了保持與持續遠離的目標之間的距離，你已經花在這個遊戲裡的時間最後成為一個無
法退出的理由。
Make no mistake, end game in every other AAA MMO(*) has been incredibly grindy
and boring once you score the first kill. As someone who has scored US top 20
kills throughout WoTLK and Cataclysm, I can attest to the fact that this
sentiment is shared by nearly every raider I've played with. It also makes
playing the game a chore - you can't stop or take a break because it sets you
and your teammates behind on the treadmill.
毫無疑問地，每個由大型遊戲公司所開發的網路遊戲所設計的 "封頂" 已經是令人
難以置信地反覆過程，一旦取得首殺之後也變得枯燥無味。做為一個曾經在巫妖王之怒
和大災變取得美國前 20 殺的玩家，我可以證明一個事實：這種感覺是幾乎所有和我
一起過打副本的玩家所共有的，也讓玩遊戲變成一個苦差事：你不能停下來或休息一下，
因為這會讓你的裝備落後，拉開你和隊友之間的距離。
(*AAA MMO 我查了網路上的註解，有一說指的是由大型遊戲開發公司 (如 SOE,
blizzard等) 耗費大量的成本 (高於兩億美金) 所製作的，這不代表遊戲一定是
好的，但至少代表開發者在各方面都努力讓他所發行的是好遊戲。)
There will be a certain class of player that craves this motivation. For
them, they need the sense of accomplishment baked into skinner box psychology
in order to motivate them.
有一群特定的玩家渴望這種動機，對他們來說，他們需要從 skinner box 得到的成就感
激勵他們。
GW2 is different. If you crave this, you might find the game unfulfilling. So
to those players I say you aren't wrong about your opinions, but GW2 may just
not be the MMO for you.
但GW2 是不同的，如果你渴望這種模式，你會覺得遊戲不過癮。因此，對這些玩家我會
說，不是你的意見不對，只是 GW2 可能不是適合你的多人網路遊戲。
TLDR(*): The rewards are playing the game.
給直接 end 的人：這個遊戲的獎勵是玩遊戲本身。
(*TLDR = Too long. Didn't read)
--
非常想說什麼。
但是說出來的，通常都不是什麼。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.240.67.35
推
10/04 17:02, , 1F
10/04 17:02, 1F
推
10/04 17:04, , 2F
10/04 17:04, 2F
推
10/04 17:04, , 3F
10/04 17:04, 3F
推
10/04 17:12, , 4F
10/04 17:12, 4F
※ 編輯: twinkle 來自: 111.240.67.35 (10/04 17:16)
推
10/04 17:39, , 5F
10/04 17:39, 5F
推
10/04 17:50, , 6F
10/04 17:50, 6F
推
10/04 18:01, , 7F
10/04 18:01, 7F
推
10/04 18:10, , 8F
10/04 18:10, 8F
→
10/04 18:10, , 9F
10/04 18:10, 9F
推
10/04 18:38, , 10F
10/04 18:38, 10F
推
10/04 18:50, , 11F
10/04 18:50, 11F
→
10/04 18:51, , 12F
10/04 18:51, 12F
→
10/04 18:52, , 13F
10/04 18:52, 13F
推
10/04 18:52, , 14F
10/04 18:52, 14F
推
10/04 18:59, , 15F
10/04 18:59, 15F
→
10/04 18:59, , 16F
10/04 18:59, 16F
推
10/04 19:13, , 17F
10/04 19:13, 17F
→
10/04 19:14, , 18F
10/04 19:14, 18F
→
10/04 19:32, , 19F
10/04 19:32, 19F
推
10/04 19:47, , 20F
10/04 19:47, 20F
→
10/04 19:53, , 21F
10/04 19:53, 21F
→
10/04 19:54, , 22F
10/04 19:54, 22F
推
10/04 19:54, , 23F
10/04 19:54, 23F
→
10/04 19:56, , 24F
10/04 19:56, 24F
推
10/04 20:04, , 25F
10/04 20:04, 25F
推
10/04 20:08, , 26F
10/04 20:08, 26F
推
10/04 20:25, , 27F
10/04 20:25, 27F
推
10/04 20:33, , 28F
10/04 20:33, 28F
推
10/04 20:34, , 29F
10/04 20:34, 29F
→
10/04 20:34, , 30F
10/04 20:34, 30F
推
10/04 20:35, , 31F
10/04 20:35, 31F
→
10/04 20:36, , 32F
10/04 20:36, 32F
推
10/04 21:15, , 33F
10/04 21:15, 33F
推
10/04 22:37, , 34F
10/04 22:37, 34F
噓
10/04 22:51, , 35F
10/04 22:51, 35F
→
10/04 22:54, , 36F
10/04 22:54, 36F
推
10/04 22:55, , 37F
10/04 22:55, 37F
→
10/05 04:05, , 38F
10/05 04:05, 38F
推
10/05 06:02, , 39F
10/05 06:02, 39F
推
10/05 07:31, , 40F
10/05 07:31, 40F
→
10/05 07:32, , 41F
10/05 07:32, 41F
→
10/05 07:34, , 42F
10/05 07:34, 42F
→
10/05 07:35, , 43F
10/05 07:35, 43F
→
10/05 07:38, , 44F
10/05 07:38, 44F
推
10/05 09:24, , 45F
10/05 09:24, 45F
→
10/05 12:30, , 46F
10/05 12:30, 46F
→
10/05 12:31, , 47F
10/05 12:31, 47F
→
10/05 12:32, , 48F
10/05 12:32, 48F
→
10/05 12:32, , 49F
10/05 12:32, 49F
→
10/05 13:59, , 50F
10/05 13:59, 50F
→
10/05 13:59, , 51F
10/05 13:59, 51F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇)：