Re: [討論] ww能打第一棒 是不是代表球隊體質還有很
※ 引述《iphone15 (哀鳳15)》之銘言:
: 就※ 引述《q124578001 (洞)》之銘言:
: : 這麼多年打下來
: : 證明他的天花板就是233的打者
: : 守備範圍還ok 臂力大概只贏胡老闆
: : 年紀也不是可以期待的新秀了
: : 在練兵時期
: : 有年輕潛力股申皓瑋可以上來吃PA
: : 要佈局明年戰力可以拉張詠漢上來試試
: : 但結論就是繼續讓不適合打一棒的ww繼續吃PA
: : -----
我們這一隊,外野手的量是很夠了.但是質本來就還有很大的進步空間
我也很希望看詠漢上來打.林WW無論攻守都不是能常駐一軍的球員.重點是小葉給他的機會
其實已經非常多了.如果今年要選個頭號愛將.我想應該就是他了吧
PJ可以守外野.不給守.要練兵.讓詠漢上來打看看,至少期待值會比林WW高也不要
詠漢的年紀雖然也已經過了年輕潛力新秀的階段.不過.在要砍掉之前.至少給一點機會啊
而且近期排的棒次也都很怪.PJ打一棒好好的為什麼要換成林WW?CF高孝儀可以守.為什麼
要讓林WW守?
而且其實林WW的年紀也離潛力新秀很遠了.為什麼他今年這麼有愛呢?
我們就是有大多LF限定的球員.教練很難調度.有一定成績又非LF限定的球員.大概只剩
釣蝦.高孝儀.火哥3位.現在釣蝦又傷,只剩2位,所以教練很難調度
這也是我一直希望PJ去外野的原因
PJ現在不去外野.明年等凱倫回來.他一樣要去外野阿.難道會讓他DH嗎?
現在比賽輸贏其實已經不是重點了.重點是練兵要練對人啊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.239.214.130
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Guardians/M.1504922932.A.85B.html
→
09/09 10:12, , 1F
09/09 10:12, 1F
推
09/09 10:16, , 2F
09/09 10:16, 2F
推
09/09 10:21, , 3F
09/09 10:21, 3F
→
09/09 10:29, , 4F
09/09 10:29, 4F
→
09/09 10:30, , 5F
09/09 10:30, 5F
推
09/09 10:34, , 6F
09/09 10:34, 6F
推
09/09 10:34, , 7F
09/09 10:34, 7F
→
09/09 10:36, , 8F
09/09 10:36, 8F
推
09/09 10:37, , 9F
09/09 10:37, 9F
→
09/09 10:37, , 10F
09/09 10:37, 10F
推
09/09 10:46, , 11F
09/09 10:46, 11F
→
09/09 10:47, , 12F
09/09 10:47, 12F
推
09/09 10:47, , 13F
09/09 10:47, 13F
→
09/09 10:48, , 14F
09/09 10:48, 14F
→
09/09 10:48, , 15F
09/09 10:48, 15F
→
09/09 10:50, , 16F
09/09 10:50, 16F
→
09/09 10:50, , 17F
09/09 10:50, 17F
→
09/09 10:50, , 18F
09/09 10:50, 18F
推
09/09 10:51, , 19F
09/09 10:51, 19F
→
09/09 10:51, , 20F
09/09 10:51, 20F
→
09/09 10:51, , 21F
09/09 10:51, 21F
→
09/09 10:51, , 22F
09/09 10:51, 22F
→
09/09 10:51, , 23F
09/09 10:51, 23F
推
09/09 10:52, , 24F
09/09 10:52, 24F
→
09/09 10:52, , 25F
09/09 10:52, 25F
→
09/09 10:53, , 26F
09/09 10:53, 26F
→
09/09 10:53, , 27F
09/09 10:53, 27F
推
09/09 10:53, , 28F
09/09 10:53, 28F
→
09/09 10:53, , 29F
09/09 10:53, 29F
→
09/09 10:54, , 30F
09/09 10:54, 30F
→
09/09 10:54, , 31F
09/09 10:54, 31F
→
09/09 10:54, , 32F
09/09 10:54, 32F
推
09/09 10:54, , 33F
09/09 10:54, 33F
→
09/09 10:54, , 34F
09/09 10:54, 34F
→
09/09 10:54, , 35F
09/09 10:54, 35F
→
09/09 10:55, , 36F
09/09 10:55, 36F
→
09/09 10:56, , 37F
09/09 10:56, 37F
推
09/09 10:56, , 38F
09/09 10:56, 38F
→
09/09 10:56, , 39F
09/09 10:56, 39F
還有 40 則推文
推
09/09 11:42, , 80F
09/09 11:42, 80F
→
09/09 11:42, , 81F
09/09 11:42, 81F
推
09/09 11:43, , 82F
09/09 11:43, 82F
→
09/09 11:44, , 83F
09/09 11:44, 83F
→
09/09 11:46, , 84F
09/09 11:46, 84F
推
09/09 11:47, , 85F
09/09 11:47, 85F
推
09/09 12:04, , 86F
09/09 12:04, 86F
推
09/09 12:06, , 87F
09/09 12:06, 87F
推
09/09 12:09, , 88F
09/09 12:09, 88F
推
09/09 12:11, , 89F
09/09 12:11, 89F
推
09/09 12:11, , 90F
09/09 12:11, 90F
→
09/09 12:12, , 91F
09/09 12:12, 91F
→
09/09 12:13, , 92F
09/09 12:13, 92F
推
09/09 12:13, , 93F
09/09 12:13, 93F
推
09/09 12:15, , 94F
09/09 12:15, 94F
推
09/09 12:23, , 95F
09/09 12:23, 95F
→
09/09 12:24, , 96F
09/09 12:24, 96F
→
09/09 12:25, , 97F
09/09 12:25, 97F
推
09/09 12:25, , 98F
09/09 12:25, 98F
推
09/09 12:27, , 99F
09/09 12:27, 99F
→
09/09 12:29, , 100F
09/09 12:29, 100F
推
09/09 12:34, , 101F
09/09 12:34, 101F
→
09/09 13:10, , 102F
09/09 13:10, 102F
→
09/09 13:10, , 103F
09/09 13:10, 103F
→
09/09 13:10, , 104F
09/09 13:10, 104F
→
09/09 13:10, , 105F
09/09 13:10, 105F
→
09/09 13:23, , 106F
09/09 13:23, 106F
→
09/09 13:34, , 107F
09/09 13:34, 107F
推
09/09 13:36, , 108F
09/09 13:36, 108F
→
09/09 13:36, , 109F
09/09 13:36, 109F
→
09/09 13:36, , 110F
09/09 13:36, 110F
→
09/09 13:39, , 111F
09/09 13:39, 111F
→
09/09 13:39, , 112F
09/09 13:39, 112F
噓
09/09 13:41, , 113F
09/09 13:41, 113F
→
09/09 13:41, , 114F
09/09 13:41, 114F
推
09/09 13:45, , 115F
09/09 13:45, 115F
→
09/09 13:45, , 116F
09/09 13:45, 116F
推
09/09 14:07, , 117F
09/09 14:07, 117F
推
09/09 15:24, , 118F
09/09 15:24, 118F
噓
09/09 17:56, , 119F
09/09 17:56, 119F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):