Re: [新聞] 「核能延役公投」遭駁回　律師：公投審議委員會再現？

看板Gossiping作者cowardlyman (有功夫無懦夫)時間4年前 (2019/11/12 00:37)推噓4(5推 1噓 12→)

留言18則, 8人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《aa1052026 (專罵藍綠垃圾黨)》之銘言： : 噓 Zuiho: 從谷歌到蘋果到微軟到索尼通通要求供應鏈全 223.137.102.242 11/11 21:32 : → Zuiho: 再生能源難道這些跨國企業比台灣擁核蠢？ 223.137.102.242 11/11 21:32 : 噓 Zuiho: 有點國際觀吧這些跨國企業就是這樣要求 223.137.102.242 11/11 21:34 : 噓 Zuiho: 多讀書現階段是配燃氣以後配儲能從來也 223.137.102.242 11/11 21:36 : → Zuiho: 不是核能 223.137.102.242 11/11 21:36 ^^^^^^ Zuhio 拜託，上次被電爆之後，還在那邊繼續造謠？ --------- 關於蘋果公司，宣稱使用100%再生能源的真相 The Truth About Apple’s ‘100% Renewable’ Energy Usage https://reurl.cc/72K8Wl The whole truth Like any other large tech company, Apple requires a lot of energy for its operations–and this energy needs to be cheap and reliable. But today’s politically correct sources of energy, above all solar and wind, are neither reliable nor affordable. To call them “renewables” is a misnomer, because “ renewables” advocates generally refuse to support the only cost-effective “ renewable” option, large-scale hydroelectric power: building a dam, they say, is not sufficiently “green.” Solar and wind should be called “unreliables” because the intermittent nature of sunlight and wind have made them useless as scalable, reliable sources of energy that can meaningfully substitute for hydro, nuclear, let alone fossil fuel power. These unreliables require subsidies and government mandates to exist. -------- 蘋果和其他大型科技公司，如果要維持營運需要大量的能源，所以這些能源必須便宜且穩定，但是太陽能和風電這兩者「間歇性」的問題，所以這種能源是不穩定且無法負擔的！所以根本無法取代穩定的水力發電、核能發電、更別說煤炭發電了！叫別人多讀書前，你讀了嗎！？ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.160.123.238 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1573490263.A.75E.html

→

abiese05

11/12 00:37, 4年前 , 1^F

11/12 00:37, 1^F