Re: [爆卦] 經濟學人：中醫是騙術，中共別亂推！已回收

看板Gossiping作者yabia (*~亞比醬~*)時間7年前 (2019/08/21 12:11)推噓4(4推 0噓 11→)

留言15則, 10人參與討論串20/73 (看更多)

※ 引述《muse87131 (qwertyuiop對啦，有人考[)》之銘言： : https://i.imgur.com/mq2DQ0g.jpg

: 經濟學人直接發文戰中醫跟中藥，說中共近年來大推中醫跟中藥根本是傷害環境，傷害人 : 民健康。 : 經濟學人直接用quackery （假醫學）這個字來指稱中醫跟中藥，並說道屠呦呦發現青蒿 : 素能治療瘧疾只是中醫給與啟發，之後的驗證還是以現代醫學的方法來進行。 : 「中藥頂多是安慰劑，但卻對環境造成嚴重傷害，而且妨礙病患治療」 : 經濟學人都說了，中醫就是一場叫不醒的騙局。 : 報道連結： : https://tinyurl.com/y5e4y4oh 文章底下有個人回的很好: This TE article and another related one are clearly written by those who knew little about TCM and its research. It may thus be helpful if they read the official deliverable reports and publications of EU’s first Coordination Action dedicated to TCM under its 7th Framework Programme. Widely known as the FP7 GP-TCM project (2009-2012), the consortium involved 200 scientists, clinicians and practitioners from 112 institutions in 24 countries. It concluded: “Modern medicine can learn from traditional practices.” http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/90960_en.html The consortium have agreed on the opportunities, challenges, priorities and guiding principles ahead, emphasising that the future of TCM must strive for good practices and should concentrate on consolidating the scientific basis and clinical practice of TCM through interdisciplinary, interregional and intersectoral collaborations. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378874112001110 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689083/ Since 2012, the missions of the FP7 GP-TCM project have been carried on by the GP-TCM Research Association, a charity registered in the United Kingdom, an international society and an Interested Party of the Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products, European Medicines Agency. http://www.gp-tcm.org/about/objectives/ As the Coordinator of the FP7 GP-TCM consortium and a BoD member of the GP-TCM RA, I certainly disagree with statements such as “TCM is about to take over the world” or the World is “entering a TCM era”. However, just as China has learnt much from “West medicine”, it is high time for the West to learn from the East too. Eventually, tomorrow’s medicine would be neither West medicine nor East medicine, but an integrated West-East Medicine, or WE medicine, as Professor Yung-Chi Cheng, Yale University, put it at a recent meeting in Guangzhou, China. A motto of the FP7 GP-TCM Project was “Sharing is good practice” and a member of the project Professor Iain Sutherland, Brunel University London, has famously said that “We are what we share”. As TE rightly pointed out, TCM is popular among Chinese people and the Chinese government is striving to promote it further nationwide and to share with the world. To share national knowledge, resources and treasures openly should be regarded a virtue, rather than a sin like opium export. Yesterday was the 41st anniversary of the death of Chairman Mao Zedong, founder of the New China. The TE articles criticised that Mao and President Xi Jinping are politically motivated in supporting TCM. However, have the authors ever asked themselves whether the dubious quotation “Even though I believe we should promote Chinese medicine, I personally do not believe in it ” is politically motivated? In recognition of Mao’s role in promoting TCM, which has directly led to the Nobel Prize-winning discovery of artemisinin, and to balance views, it might be good idea to conclude this comment by quoting Mao’s remark cited by Professor Tu Youyou at her Nobel Prize Awarding Ceremony: “Chinese medicine and pharmacology are a great treasure house and efforts should be made to explore them and raise them to a higher level.” -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 202.39.33.67 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1566360698.A.C95.html

→

Tattoo

08/21 12:11, 7年前 , 1^F

08/21 12:11, 1^F

→

POWERSERIES

08/21 12:12, 7年前 , 2^F

08/21 12:12, 2^F

喔喔喔~

推

z80520xx

08/21 12:12, 7年前 , 3^F

08/21 12:12, 3^F

這篇文章和另一篇相關文章清楚地由那些對中醫(傳統醫學)及其研究知之甚少的人撰寫。因此，如果他們有去研究歐盟第一個專門針對中醫藥的協調行動的官方可交付成果報告和出版物，可能會有所幫助。該聯盟被廣泛稱為FP7 GP-TCM項目（2009-2012），涉及來自24個國家的112個機構的200名科學家，臨床醫生和從業者。它的結論是：“現代醫學可以從傳統習俗中學習。” http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/90960_en.html 該聯盟已就未來的機遇，挑戰，優先事項和指導原則達成一致，強調中醫的未來必須努力實現良好做法，並應通過跨學科，區域間和跨部門的合作，集中精力鞏固中醫的科學基礎和臨床實踐。 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378874112001110 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3689083/ 自2012年以來，FP7 GP-TCM項目的任務由GP-TCM研究協會，一個在英國註冊的慈善機構，一個國際社會和草藥產品委員會的利益方，歐洲藥品管理局進行。 http://www.gp-tcm.org/about/objectives/ 作為FP7 GP-TCM聯盟的協調員和GP-TCM RA的BoD成員，我當然不同意諸如“中醫即將接管世界”或“世界正在進入中醫時代”這樣的陳述。然而，正如中國從“西醫”中學到的東西一樣，西方現在也應該向東方學習。最終，明天的醫學既不是西醫也不是東方醫學，而是耶魯大學鄭永成教授最近在中國廣州召開的一次綜合性的東西醫學。 FP7 GP-TCM項目的座右銘是“分享是一種良好的做法”，倫敦布魯內爾大學的Iain Sutherland教授項目成員曾經說過“我們就是我們所共享的”。正如TE正確指出的那樣，中醫在中國人民中很受歡迎，中國政府正在努力在全國范圍內進一步推廣，與世界分享。公開分享國家知識，資源和財富應該被視為一種美德，而不是像鴉片出口那樣的罪惡。昨天是新中國創始人毛澤東逝世41週年。TE文章批評毛澤東和習近平主席在支持中醫方面有政治動機。然而，作者有沒有問自己這個可疑的引文“即使我認為我們應該推廣中醫，我個人不相信它”是出於政治動機嗎？為了表彰毛澤東在促進中醫藥方面的作用，這直接導致了青蒿素的諾貝爾獎獲得發現，並平衡了觀點，引用塗教授在諾貝爾獎中引用毛澤東的話來結束這一評論可能是個好主意。頒獎典禮： “中藥和藥理學是一個巨大的寶庫，應該努力探索它們並將它們提升到更高的水平。” 以上~ ※ 編輯: yabia (202.39.33.67 臺灣), 08/21/2019 12:17:33

→

yang19930707

08/21 12:15, 7年前 , 4^F

08/21 12:15, 4^F

→

k33536

08/21 12:16, 7年前 , 5^F

08/21 12:16, 5^F

推

cheetahspeed

08/21 12:17, 7年前 , 6^F

08/21 12:17, 6^F