[問卦] 是不是等多一點老人死掉台灣才會變好消失
現在台灣的問題已經不是藍綠之爭
而是世代之爭
老一輩抱持著食古不化的保守思維不斷阻礙社會的進步
不管在統獨議題、同婚議題、論述能力和公民水準
50歲以上的中老年人已經和現在新一代青壯年有顯著差距
看這次支持罷免黃國昌的也多半都是腦子不會自己動的婆婆媽媽
老一輩對於政治的印象也還停留在跑紅白包消罰單這種爛事
是不是真的要再過十幾年等這些阻礙社會前進的保守人士都過世之後
台灣才有可能邁向進步和成熟法治的公民社會呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.82.45.171
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1508390542.A.970.html
→
10/19 13:22, , 1F
10/19 13:22, 1F
→
10/19 13:22, , 2F
10/19 13:22, 2F
→
10/19 13:23, , 3F
10/19 13:23, 3F
推
10/19 13:23, , 4F
10/19 13:23, 4F
噓
10/19 13:23, , 5F
10/19 13:23, 5F
我們這一代是覺醒的世代好嗎
現在的老人根本沒有公民社會的思維
推
10/19 13:23, , 6F
10/19 13:23, 6F
安啦台灣老人不會那麼長壽啦
※ 編輯: ruokcnn (111.82.45.171), 10/19/2017 13:24:20
推
10/19 13:23, , 7F
10/19 13:23, 7F
→
10/19 13:23, , 8F
10/19 13:23, 8F
推
10/19 13:23, , 9F
10/19 13:23, 9F
→
10/19 13:23, , 10F
10/19 13:23, 10F
→
10/19 13:23, , 11F
10/19 13:23, 11F
→
10/19 13:24, , 12F
10/19 13:24, 12F
慫恿犯罪逆
→
10/19 13:24, , 13F
10/19 13:24, 13F
推
10/19 13:24, , 14F
10/19 13:24, 14F
對
→
10/19 13:24, , 15F
10/19 13:24, 15F
→
10/19 13:24, , 16F
10/19 13:24, 16F
推
10/19 13:24, , 17F
10/19 13:24, 17F
噓
10/19 13:24, , 18F
10/19 13:24, 18F
→
10/19 13:24, , 19F
10/19 13:24, 19F
推
10/19 13:24, , 20F
10/19 13:24, 20F
推
10/19 13:24, , 21F
10/19 13:24, 21F
→
10/19 13:25, , 22F
10/19 13:25, 22F
推
10/19 13:25, , 23F
10/19 13:25, 23F
噓
10/19 13:26, , 24F
10/19 13:26, 24F
→
10/19 13:26, , 25F
10/19 13:26, 25F
→
10/19 13:27, , 26F
10/19 13:27, 26F
噓
10/19 13:27, , 27F
10/19 13:27, 27F
→
10/19 13:27, , 28F
10/19 13:27, 28F
上一代是極權國家培養出來的世代
我們是民主原生世代
我不覺得這兩批人年老的時候是一樣封閉的
→
10/19 13:27, , 29F
10/19 13:27, 29F
QQ
※ 編輯: ruokcnn (111.82.45.171), 10/19/2017 13:30:50
噓
10/19 13:28, , 30F
10/19 13:28, 30F
→
10/19 13:28, , 31F
10/19 13:28, 31F
噓
10/19 13:29, , 32F
10/19 13:29, 32F
噓
10/19 13:30, , 33F
10/19 13:30, 33F
→
10/19 13:30, , 34F
10/19 13:30, 34F
→
10/19 13:30, , 35F
10/19 13:30, 35F
推
10/19 13:31, , 36F
10/19 13:31, 36F
推
10/19 13:31, , 37F
10/19 13:31, 37F
→
10/19 13:32, , 38F
10/19 13:32, 38F
→
10/19 13:32, , 39F
10/19 13:32, 39F
→
10/19 13:33, , 40F
10/19 13:33, 40F
噓
10/19 13:33, , 41F
10/19 13:33, 41F
→
10/19 13:34, , 42F
10/19 13:34, 42F
→
10/19 13:34, , 43F
10/19 13:34, 43F
→
10/19 13:34, , 44F
10/19 13:34, 44F
噓
10/19 13:34, , 45F
10/19 13:34, 45F
→
10/19 13:34, , 46F
10/19 13:34, 46F
噓
10/19 13:41, , 47F
10/19 13:41, 47F
→
10/19 13:42, , 48F
10/19 13:42, 48F
→
10/19 13:42, , 49F
10/19 13:42, 49F
噓
10/19 13:44, , 50F
10/19 13:44, 50F
→
10/19 13:44, , 51F
10/19 13:44, 51F
→
10/19 13:44, , 52F
10/19 13:44, 52F
噓
10/19 13:50, , 53F
10/19 13:50, 53F
推
10/19 13:53, , 54F
10/19 13:53, 54F
推
10/19 13:58, , 55F
10/19 13:58, 55F
→
10/19 14:01, , 56F
10/19 14:01, 56F
→
10/19 14:44, , 57F
10/19 14:44, 57F
噓
10/19 15:16, , 58F
10/19 15:16, 58F
→
10/19 15:17, , 59F
10/19 15:17, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):