Re: [新聞] 不讓柯P專美於前 宜花竹苗四縣市鉛管汰換早已全數完成消失
把時間拉回2015:
https://tinyurl.com/y7acd7ff
全台灣使用鉛管的自來水用戶3.7萬戶
台北市佔1.7萬戶 將近一半
新北市佔1萬多戶(看最近的新聞新北有1.8萬戶)
大台北地區加起來超過一半 甚至超過9成
這種替換速度 你說柯文哲割稻尾搶功搶曝光?
苗栗宜蘭花蓮三縣市加起來6000多戶
當時已規劃2016年前更換完畢:
https://tinyurl.com/ybmbu2le
(台灣自來水公司今(19)日表示 到9月底止
還有苗栗縣 宜蘭縣及花蓮縣等地區共計 6,651戶用戶)
有沒有比例不同還硬弄在一起比較的八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.163.244.201
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1507050557.A.9FE.html
推
10/04 01:09, , 1F
10/04 01:09, 1F
→
10/04 01:10, , 2F
10/04 01:10, 2F
推
10/04 01:10, , 3F
10/04 01:10, 3F
推
10/04 01:10, , 4F
10/04 01:10, 4F
推
10/04 01:11, , 5F
10/04 01:11, 5F
→
10/04 01:11, , 6F
10/04 01:11, 6F
推
10/04 01:12, , 7F
10/04 01:12, 7F
這次替換效率快很多很多 新北市也更換的很快
※ 編輯: ghostl40809 (1.163.244.201), 10/04/2017 01:13:25
→
10/04 01:12, , 8F
10/04 01:12, 8F
→
10/04 01:12, , 9F
10/04 01:12, 9F
→
10/04 01:13, , 10F
10/04 01:13, 10F
推
10/04 01:13, , 11F
10/04 01:13, 11F
→
10/04 01:13, , 12F
10/04 01:13, 12F
噓
10/04 01:14, , 13F
10/04 01:14, 13F
→
10/04 01:14, , 14F
10/04 01:14, 14F
→
10/04 01:15, , 15F
10/04 01:15, 15F
2015年新聞3.7萬的數據公布時 新北估計只有1萬多戶
但2017 最近的新聞 看到的數據是18000多戶
可能新北市發現了更多需要更換的管線 希望有回答到你的疑問
https://tinyurl.com/gwn9fc4
新北市一共18727戶 蘋果日報2017年3月13日的新聞
應該是清查後 發現戶數增加
推
10/04 01:15, , 16F
10/04 01:15, 16F
→
10/04 01:16, , 17F
10/04 01:16, 17F
推
10/04 01:17, , 18F
10/04 01:17, 18F
※ 編輯: ghostl40809 (1.163.244.201), 10/04/2017 01:19:38
推
10/04 01:18, , 19F
10/04 01:18, 19F
推
10/04 01:19, , 20F
10/04 01:19, 20F
※ 編輯: ghostl40809 (1.163.244.201), 10/04/2017 01:25:03
→
10/04 01:23, , 21F
10/04 01:23, 21F
推
10/04 01:25, , 22F
10/04 01:25, 22F
噓
10/04 01:28, , 23F
10/04 01:28, 23F
回去看2015新聞 當時估計要10年後(2025)才能完工
會有執行徑賽一說的結論是很合理的
※ 編輯: ghostl40809 (1.163.244.201), 10/04/2017 01:30:47
推
10/04 01:33, , 24F
10/04 01:33, 24F
推
10/04 01:36, , 25F
10/04 01:36, 25F
推
10/04 01:45, , 26F
10/04 01:45, 26F
推
10/04 01:45, , 27F
10/04 01:45, 27F
→
10/04 01:45, , 28F
10/04 01:45, 28F
推
10/04 01:47, , 29F
10/04 01:47, 29F
推
10/04 01:49, , 30F
10/04 01:49, 30F
推
10/04 01:52, , 31F
10/04 01:52, 31F
→
10/04 01:54, , 32F
10/04 01:54, 32F
推
10/04 02:00, , 33F
10/04 02:00, 33F
推
10/04 02:03, , 34F
10/04 02:03, 34F
→
10/04 02:03, , 35F
10/04 02:03, 35F
→
10/04 02:03, , 36F
10/04 02:03, 36F
推
10/04 02:09, , 37F
10/04 02:09, 37F
推
10/04 02:17, , 38F
10/04 02:17, 38F
推
10/04 02:18, , 39F
10/04 02:18, 39F
→
10/04 02:19, , 40F
10/04 02:19, 40F
推
10/04 02:22, , 41F
10/04 02:22, 41F
推
10/04 03:02, , 42F
10/04 03:02, 42F
推
10/04 03:12, , 43F
10/04 03:12, 43F
→
10/04 03:24, , 44F
10/04 03:24, 44F
→
10/04 03:25, , 45F
10/04 03:25, 45F
推
10/04 06:23, , 46F
10/04 06:23, 46F
推
10/04 06:39, , 47F
10/04 06:39, 47F
推
10/04 07:35, , 48F
10/04 07:35, 48F
推
10/04 07:55, , 49F
10/04 07:55, 49F
推
10/04 08:00, , 50F
10/04 08:00, 50F
→
10/04 08:10, , 51F
10/04 08:10, 51F
推
10/04 08:19, , 52F
10/04 08:19, 52F
推
10/04 08:23, , 53F
10/04 08:23, 53F
推
10/04 08:34, , 54F
10/04 08:34, 54F
推
10/04 08:35, , 55F
10/04 08:35, 55F
推
10/04 09:06, , 56F
10/04 09:06, 56F
→
10/04 09:27, , 57F
10/04 09:27, 57F
推
10/04 09:49, , 58F
10/04 09:49, 58F
推
10/04 10:11, , 59F
10/04 10:11, 59F
→
10/04 10:11, , 60F
10/04 10:11, 60F
推
10/04 10:16, , 61F
10/04 10:16, 61F
推
10/04 10:21, , 62F
10/04 10:21, 62F
推
10/04 10:27, , 63F
10/04 10:27, 63F
推
10/04 11:10, , 64F
10/04 11:10, 64F
→
10/04 11:32, , 65F
10/04 11:32, 65F
推
10/04 12:05, , 66F
10/04 12:05, 66F
推
10/04 12:47, , 67F
10/04 12:47, 67F
→
10/04 13:08, , 68F
10/04 13:08, 68F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):