[新聞] 表態台獨掀波 賴:盼立委別再問個人立場消失
1.媒體來源:
蘋果日報
2.完整新聞標題:
表態台獨掀波 賴清德:盼立委質詢別再問我個人立場
3.完整新聞內文:
行政院長賴清德日前首度進立法院備詢時,拋出自己是「主張台灣獨立的政治工作者」一
說,飽受在野黨質疑。今天上午賴清德再到立法院備詢,會前受訪表示,如果有在野黨立
委認為他當行政院長,不該有個人立場,這點他是同意的,因此他也非常希望後續立委對
他的質詢,「千萬不要問我個人立場,否則我會陷入兩難」,若不回答,對立委不夠尊重
,回答又有這樣的問題。
賴清德說,未來希望他面對立院備詢時,大家都能有共同想法,都站在職務上好好推動國
家發展。
媒體詢問,近日美中要重啟談判,賴的台獨宣言是否時機特殊?賴清德說,他在立院所言
都是應立委質詢的回答,其實這也是講出事實,也是多數民眾的聲音,並沒有特別要去干
擾美中談判的立場。至於新黨揚言要為台獨說告賴清德瀆職,賴清德說,「我只能尊重」
。(曾盈瑜/台北報導)
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20170929/1213325/
5.備註:
為啥不能問個人立場?兩難在那?
放完炮後就說要專心政事?
很多媒體和民代們不是最愛問別人個人立場嗎?
--
在PTT混久了會得到很多稱號,像我就有:
藍的、綠的、吱吱、蛆蛆、糞青、覺青、獨派、柯粉、網軍....
最近我發現我又多了:
五毛、瘋seafood
可惜這些稱號都沒有屬性加成呢!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.170.162.45
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1506653576.A.490.html
→
09/29 10:53, , 1F
09/29 10:53, 1F
→
09/29 10:53, , 2F
09/29 10:53, 2F
推
09/29 10:53, , 3F
09/29 10:53, 3F
噓
09/29 10:54, , 4F
09/29 10:54, 4F
噓
09/29 10:54, , 5F
09/29 10:54, 5F
→
09/29 10:54, , 6F
09/29 10:54, 6F
→
09/29 10:54, , 7F
09/29 10:54, 7F
質詢時問無關個人職權的事不是台灣議會傳統了嗎?
又不是只有賴被這樣問,為什麼別人被問就應該,賴就不行?
推
09/29 10:54, , 8F
09/29 10:54, 8F
→
09/29 10:54, , 9F
09/29 10:54, 9F
→
09/29 10:54, , 10F
09/29 10:54, 10F
噓
09/29 10:54, , 11F
09/29 10:54, 11F
→
09/29 10:55, , 12F
09/29 10:55, 12F
→
09/29 10:55, , 13F
09/29 10:55, 13F
→
09/29 10:55, , 14F
09/29 10:55, 14F
推
09/29 10:55, , 15F
09/29 10:55, 15F
推
09/29 10:55, , 16F
09/29 10:55, 16F
→
09/29 10:55, , 17F
09/29 10:55, 17F
→
09/29 10:56, , 18F
09/29 10:56, 18F
你現在才發現呀! (大驚)
→
09/29 10:57, , 19F
09/29 10:57, 19F
→
09/29 10:57, , 20F
09/29 10:57, 20F
→
09/29 10:57, , 21F
09/29 10:57, 21F
→
09/29 10:58, , 22F
09/29 10:58, 22F
他只是說希望不要問
推
09/29 10:58, , 23F
09/29 10:58, 23F
台灣議會拖台錢又不是啥新聞...
我怎有種你現在才發現台灣議會長怎樣的感覺。
※ 編輯: wizardfizban (1.170.162.45), 09/29/2017 10:59:54
→
09/29 10:58, , 24F
09/29 10:58, 24F
→
09/29 10:59, , 25F
09/29 10:59, 25F
→
09/29 10:59, , 26F
09/29 10:59, 26F
→
09/29 10:59, , 27F
09/29 10:59, 27F
→
09/29 10:59, , 28F
09/29 10:59, 28F
推
09/29 11:00, , 29F
09/29 11:00, 29F
→
09/29 11:01, , 30F
09/29 11:01, 30F
推
09/29 11:01, , 31F
09/29 11:01, 31F
→
09/29 11:02, , 32F
09/29 11:02, 32F
噓
09/29 11:05, , 33F
09/29 11:05, 33F
推
09/29 11:06, , 34F
09/29 11:06, 34F
推
09/29 11:07, , 35F
09/29 11:07, 35F
→
09/29 11:07, , 36F
09/29 11:07, 36F
推
09/29 11:09, , 37F
09/29 11:09, 37F
推
09/29 11:09, , 38F
09/29 11:09, 38F
推
09/29 11:11, , 39F
09/29 11:11, 39F
推
09/29 11:13, , 40F
09/29 11:13, 40F
噓
09/29 11:22, , 41F
09/29 11:22, 41F
→
09/29 11:22, , 42F
09/29 11:22, 42F
→
09/29 11:23, , 43F
09/29 11:23, 43F
→
09/29 11:25, , 44F
09/29 11:25, 44F
噓
09/29 11:28, , 45F
09/29 11:28, 45F
→
09/29 11:34, , 46F
09/29 11:34, 46F
→
09/29 11:41, , 47F
09/29 11:41, 47F
噓
09/29 11:44, , 48F
09/29 11:44, 48F
→
09/29 11:45, , 49F
09/29 11:45, 49F
噓
09/29 11:48, , 50F
09/29 11:48, 50F
噓
09/29 11:56, , 51F
09/29 11:56, 51F
→
09/29 12:35, , 52F
09/29 12:35, 52F
→
09/29 12:36, , 53F
09/29 12:36, 53F
推
09/29 12:52, , 54F
09/29 12:52, 54F
→
09/29 12:53, , 55F
09/29 12:53, 55F
→
09/29 12:53, , 56F
09/29 12:53, 56F
→
09/29 12:53, , 57F
09/29 12:53, 57F
→
09/29 12:53, , 58F
09/29 12:53, 58F
→
09/29 12:54, , 59F
09/29 12:54, 59F
→
09/29 12:54, , 60F
09/29 12:54, 60F
噓
09/29 13:04, , 61F
09/29 13:04, 61F
推
09/29 14:25, , 62F
09/29 14:25, 62F
→
09/29 14:26, , 63F
09/29 14:26, 63F
推
09/29 19:35, , 64F
09/29 19:35, 64F
→
09/29 19:35, , 65F
09/29 19:35, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):