[問卦] 同性戀是天生的還是後天造成的消失
如題
下午看到隔壁的同事在討論這個議題
大家都覺得先天有差 但後天環境絕對有影響
如果開放同婚
風氣助長下甲甲跟TT一定會變多
甲甲多就算了 但很多TT 好好打扮其實可以是正妹 覺得有點可惜
護家盟這部分的論述比較正確
想想也是覺得蠻的合理 大家怎麼看?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.161.240.48
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505724912.A.656.html
→
09/18 16:55, , 1F
09/18 16:55, 1F
推
09/18 16:56, , 2F
09/18 16:56, 2F
噓
09/18 16:56, , 3F
09/18 16:56, 3F
推
09/18 16:56, , 4F
09/18 16:56, 4F
推
09/18 16:57, , 5F
09/18 16:57, 5F
→
09/18 16:57, , 6F
09/18 16:57, 6F
不變T就有機會啊 很多是雙性戀耶
只要社會氛圍不要太開放 另一部分的性向就會降低?
推
09/18 16:57, , 7F
09/18 16:57, 7F
推
09/18 16:57, , 8F
09/18 16:57, 8F
→
09/18 16:57, , 9F
09/18 16:57, 9F
可是會減少吧?
推
09/18 16:57, , 10F
09/18 16:57, 10F
→
09/18 16:57, , 11F
09/18 16:57, 11F
→
09/18 16:57, , 12F
09/18 16:57, 12F
※ 編輯: redhorse (1.161.240.48), 09/18/2017 16:59:10
→
09/18 16:58, , 13F
09/18 16:58, 13F
→
09/18 16:58, , 14F
09/18 16:58, 14F
→
09/18 16:58, , 15F
09/18 16:58, 15F
噓
09/18 16:58, , 16F
09/18 16:58, 16F
→
09/18 16:59, , 17F
09/18 16:59, 17F
→
09/18 16:59, , 18F
09/18 16:59, 18F
→
09/18 17:00, , 19F
09/18 17:00, 19F
噓
09/18 17:00, , 20F
09/18 17:00, 20F
噓
09/18 17:00, , 21F
09/18 17:00, 21F
→
09/18 17:01, , 22F
09/18 17:01, 22F
→
09/18 17:01, , 23F
09/18 17:01, 23F
→
09/18 17:01, , 24F
09/18 17:01, 24F
→
09/18 17:01, , 25F
09/18 17:01, 25F
噓
09/18 17:01, , 26F
09/18 17:01, 26F
→
09/18 17:01, , 27F
09/18 17:01, 27F
推
09/18 17:01, , 28F
09/18 17:01, 28F

→
09/18 17:02, , 29F
09/18 17:02, 29F
→
09/18 17:02, , 30F
09/18 17:02, 30F
→
09/18 17:02, , 31F
09/18 17:02, 31F
推
09/18 17:02, , 32F
09/18 17:02, 32F
→
09/18 17:03, , 33F
09/18 17:03, 33F
推
09/18 17:03, , 34F
09/18 17:03, 34F
→
09/18 17:03, , 35F
09/18 17:03, 35F
推
09/18 17:03, , 36F
09/18 17:03, 36F
推
09/18 17:05, , 37F
09/18 17:05, 37F
噓
09/18 17:05, , 38F
09/18 17:05, 38F
→
09/18 17:05, , 39F
09/18 17:05, 39F
推
09/18 17:10, , 40F
09/18 17:10, 40F
大家不要歪樓人身攻擊了
同性戀異性戀都是人
只是單純探討是不是天生的而已
※ 編輯: redhorse (1.161.240.48), 09/18/2017 17:11:57
推
09/18 17:12, , 41F
09/18 17:12, 41F
推
09/18 17:13, , 42F
09/18 17:13, 42F
推
09/18 17:15, , 43F
09/18 17:15, 43F
噓
09/18 17:15, , 44F
09/18 17:15, 44F
推
09/18 17:18, , 45F
09/18 17:18, 45F
→
09/18 17:18, , 46F
09/18 17:18, 46F
→
09/18 17:19, , 47F
09/18 17:19, 47F
推
09/18 17:19, , 48F
09/18 17:19, 48F
→
09/18 17:20, , 49F
09/18 17:20, 49F
→
09/18 17:21, , 50F
09/18 17:21, 50F
→
09/18 17:24, , 51F
09/18 17:24, 51F
→
09/18 17:25, , 52F
09/18 17:25, 52F
→
09/18 17:25, , 53F
09/18 17:25, 53F
→
09/18 17:25, , 54F
09/18 17:25, 54F
→
09/18 17:33, , 55F
09/18 17:33, 55F
噓
09/18 17:35, , 56F
09/18 17:35, 56F
推
09/18 17:35, , 57F
09/18 17:35, 57F
推
09/18 17:43, , 58F
09/18 17:43, 58F
噓
09/18 17:47, , 59F
09/18 17:47, 59F
推
09/18 18:00, , 60F
09/18 18:00, 60F
推
09/18 18:00, , 61F
09/18 18:00, 61F
推
09/18 18:01, , 62F
09/18 18:01, 62F
噓
09/18 18:45, , 63F
09/18 18:45, 63F
→
09/18 18:57, , 64F
09/18 18:57, 64F
噓
09/18 20:21, , 65F
09/18 20:21, 65F
→
09/18 21:38, , 66F
09/18 21:38, 66F
→
09/18 21:39, , 67F
09/18 21:39, 67F
→
09/18 23:53, , 68F
09/18 23:53, 68F
推
09/30 05:35, , 69F
09/30 05:35, 69F
→
09/30 05:35, , 70F
09/30 05:35, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):