[新聞] 民進黨要不要禮讓柯P? 陳菊:還沒正式討論消失
民進黨要不要禮讓柯P? 陳菊:還沒正式討論
2017-09-11 22:33聯合報 記者蔡孟妤╱即時報導
明年台北市長選舉,民進黨是否繼續禮讓柯文哲?身兼民進黨中常委的高雄市長陳菊表示
,民進黨內部,就她了解,還沒正式討論這個議題。但她認為,民進黨要不要跟他合作不
是重點,民進黨的執政、改革有沒有讓社會感動,才是重點。
陳菊說,是否與柯文哲合作,這部分黨內會有些討論,但他身為資深的民進黨中常委,「
目前我沒有參與這些討論。」
陳菊說,柯文哲的人生很幸運,但她不擔心柯文哲會成為民進黨的威脅,一個黨的執政要
得到人民嚴格檢驗,能不能執政,執政成績才是重點,民進黨接受所有其他不同政黨的挑
戰,包括柯文哲的挑戰,這沒什麼好奇怪的。重點是,執政時有沒有了解人民的期待?改
革有沒有讓社會感動?這才是重點。
柯文哲曾批評高雄市負債多,陳菊坦言,「對,我當然很不舒服!」她說,因此市府做了
嚴正批柯「飽漢不知餓漢飢」。
陳菊說,在批評前要先有足夠了解,講任何話都要負責、都要謹慎,「這是我們跟他不一
樣的地方」,柯文哲不了解高雄的建設,這麼簡單就做這種批評,台北傾全國之力,完成
10多條軌道,高雄只有2條BOT的捷運線,如今高雄有機會蛻變轉型,首都應該給予祝福,
卻如此草率批評,「我們不以為然、也不接受。」
對於外界揣測賴清德此時接閣揆,是為了沖淡剛結束的世大運給柯文哲帶來的高人氣,陳
菊回說,討論閣揆從沒人把柯文哲因素討論進去,柯文哲民調高低很自然,我們給他高度
祝福,但這跟民進黨的人事安排毫無關係。
有評論指,讓賴清德接閣揆,是為了阻止他2020年挑戰總統大位,陳菊說,民進黨內部對
蔡英文的支持很堅定,縱使黨內有競爭關係,但民進黨對蔡英文的支持是「毫無問題」的
,內部沒有這樣的矛盾。
https://udn.com/news/story/6656/2695804
--
sent from my NOKIA 3310
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.254.91.135
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505148283.A.BB1.html
→
09/12 00:45, , 1F
09/12 00:45, 1F
噓
09/12 00:45, , 2F
09/12 00:45, 2F
→
09/12 00:45, , 3F
09/12 00:45, 3F
→
09/12 00:45, , 4F
09/12 00:45, 4F
→
09/12 00:45, , 5F
09/12 00:45, 5F
推
09/12 00:45, , 6F
09/12 00:45, 6F
→
09/12 00:46, , 7F
09/12 00:46, 7F
推
09/12 00:47, , 8F
09/12 00:47, 8F
推
09/12 00:47, , 9F
09/12 00:47, 9F
噓
09/12 00:48, , 10F
09/12 00:48, 10F
→
09/12 00:49, , 11F
09/12 00:49, 11F
推
09/12 00:49, , 12F
09/12 00:49, 12F
→
09/12 00:49, , 13F
09/12 00:49, 13F
推
09/12 00:49, , 14F
09/12 00:49, 14F
→
09/12 00:50, , 15F
09/12 00:50, 15F
推
09/12 00:50, , 16F
09/12 00:50, 16F
推
09/12 00:51, , 17F
09/12 00:51, 17F
推
09/12 00:51, , 18F
09/12 00:51, 18F
→
09/12 00:52, , 19F
09/12 00:52, 19F
推
09/12 00:52, , 20F
09/12 00:52, 20F
→
09/12 00:53, , 21F
09/12 00:53, 21F
→
09/12 00:54, , 22F
09/12 00:54, 22F
推
09/12 00:56, , 23F
09/12 00:56, 23F
噓
09/12 00:57, , 24F
09/12 00:57, 24F
推
09/12 01:02, , 25F
09/12 01:02, 25F
推
09/12 01:02, , 26F
09/12 01:02, 26F
噓
09/12 01:04, , 27F
09/12 01:04, 27F
推
09/12 01:09, , 28F
09/12 01:09, 28F
推
09/12 01:11, , 29F
09/12 01:11, 29F
→
09/12 01:14, , 30F
09/12 01:14, 30F
推
09/12 01:16, , 31F
09/12 01:16, 31F
推
09/12 01:18, , 32F
09/12 01:18, 32F
→
09/12 01:18, , 33F
09/12 01:18, 33F
噓
09/12 01:18, , 34F
09/12 01:18, 34F
噓
09/12 01:30, , 35F
09/12 01:30, 35F
→
09/12 01:32, , 36F
09/12 01:32, 36F
→
09/12 01:51, , 37F
09/12 01:51, 37F
→
09/12 01:52, , 38F
09/12 01:52, 38F
推
09/12 02:22, , 39F
09/12 02:22, 39F
推
09/12 02:41, , 40F
09/12 02:41, 40F
推
09/12 02:42, , 41F
09/12 02:42, 41F
噓
09/12 02:49, , 42F
09/12 02:49, 42F
噓
09/12 03:00, , 43F
09/12 03:00, 43F
→
09/12 03:00, , 44F
09/12 03:00, 44F
→
09/12 03:22, , 45F
09/12 03:22, 45F
推
09/12 04:54, , 46F
09/12 04:54, 46F
→
09/12 06:57, , 47F
09/12 06:57, 47F
推
09/12 07:08, , 48F
09/12 07:08, 48F
→
09/12 08:13, , 49F
09/12 08:13, 49F
噓
09/12 08:26, , 50F
09/12 08:26, 50F
噓
09/12 09:23, , 51F
09/12 09:23, 51F
推
09/12 09:25, , 52F
09/12 09:25, 52F
噓
09/12 10:27, , 53F
09/12 10:27, 53F
→
09/12 10:27, , 54F
09/12 10:27, 54F
噓
09/12 10:32, , 55F
09/12 10:32, 55F
噓
09/12 12:41, , 56F
09/12 12:41, 56F
推
09/12 14:53, , 57F
09/12 14:53, 57F
噓
09/12 19:56, , 58F
09/12 19:56, 58F
→
09/12 20:35, , 59F
09/12 20:35, 59F
→
09/12 20:36, , 60F
09/12 20:36, 60F
→
09/12 20:36, , 61F
09/12 20:36, 61F
噓
09/18 03:26, , 62F
09/18 03:26, 62F
噓
09/18 08:35, , 63F
09/18 08:35, 63F
噓
09/18 11:01, , 64F
09/18 11:01, 64F
噓
09/18 11:20, , 65F
09/18 11:20, 65F
噓
09/18 12:26, , 66F
09/18 12:26, 66F
噓
09/18 13:25, , 67F
09/18 13:25, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):