[問卦] 佛教是不是相對於其他宗教比較討喜?消失
來講講看世界上幾個大宗教好了
基督教:
沒事路上就跟你宣傳上帝多美好
聖經是多麼的好看,跟你宣揚愛與和平
信耶穌得永生,主會赦免你的罪
笑死結果這個教義宣傳大愛的宗教在歷史上四處攻擊壓迫其他宗教
直到現在還是認為自己的神是真的,其他宗教都是邪魔歪道,不信耶穌的都下地獄
神愛世人,但是不信基督教的不算世人喔
伊斯蘭教:
基本上我覺得每個宗教都差不多爛
但是只有這個宗教被基督教黑的特別誇張
好啦幫QQ一下
但是還是爛,隨便質疑一下都會被教徒攻擊,跟基督徒沒什麼差別
馬國還特地設法規禁止別人質疑伊斯蘭教,可悲
道教:
整天出陣頭擾民,自己的信徒也不教育好,教出一堆8+9
燒金紙燒香燒來燒去
雖然不像前面兩個不能質疑但是還是給別人造成困擾
佛教:
強調個人修行,他修他的我做我的互不干涉
不會在街上四處宣揚佛的美好一直煩別人入較
也不會你質疑一下佛他就跟你輸贏,跟你辯倒是比較有可能
基本上也算是無神論,佛陀只是創教者和悟道之人
信徒也沒把他當神拜
基本上佛教好像沒給人造成什麼困擾,也沒有整天去攻擊其他宗教
佛教是不是相對討喜的宗教阿?
--
我愛れをる<3 http://i.imgur.com/1mioXRp.png






--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.39.31.46
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505094708.A.D82.html
→
09/11 09:52, , 1F
09/11 09:52, 1F
→
09/11 09:52, , 2F
09/11 09:52, 2F
→
09/11 09:52, , 3F
09/11 09:52, 3F
推
09/11 09:52, , 4F
09/11 09:52, 4F
→
09/11 09:53, , 5F
09/11 09:53, 5F
→
09/11 09:53, , 6F
09/11 09:53, 6F
推
09/11 09:53, , 7F
09/11 09:53, 7F
推
09/11 09:54, , 8F
09/11 09:54, 8F
推
09/11 09:54, , 9F
09/11 09:54, 9F
→
09/11 09:54, , 10F
09/11 09:54, 10F
→
09/11 09:54, , 11F
09/11 09:54, 11F
推
09/11 09:55, , 12F
09/11 09:55, 12F
→
09/11 09:55, , 13F
09/11 09:55, 13F
推
09/11 09:56, , 14F
09/11 09:56, 14F
→
09/11 09:58, , 15F
09/11 09:58, 15F
推
09/11 09:58, , 16F
09/11 09:58, 16F
推
09/11 09:58, , 17F
09/11 09:58, 17F
推
09/11 09:59, , 18F
09/11 09:59, 18F
推
09/11 09:59, , 19F
09/11 09:59, 19F
→
09/11 09:59, , 20F
09/11 09:59, 20F
噓
09/11 10:02, , 21F
09/11 10:02, 21F
→
09/11 10:02, , 22F
09/11 10:02, 22F
→
09/11 10:03, , 23F
09/11 10:03, 23F
噓
09/11 10:05, , 24F
09/11 10:05, 24F
推
09/11 10:07, , 25F
09/11 10:07, 25F
→
09/11 10:11, , 26F
09/11 10:11, 26F
推
09/11 10:15, , 27F
09/11 10:15, 27F
噓
09/11 10:15, , 28F
09/11 10:15, 28F
→
09/11 10:15, , 29F
09/11 10:15, 29F
→
09/11 10:15, , 30F
09/11 10:15, 30F
→
09/11 10:17, , 31F
09/11 10:17, 31F
推
09/11 10:23, , 32F
09/11 10:23, 32F
推
09/11 10:28, , 33F
09/11 10:28, 33F
推
09/11 10:29, , 34F
09/11 10:29, 34F
→
09/11 10:29, , 35F
09/11 10:29, 35F
推
09/11 10:31, , 36F
09/11 10:31, 36F
噓
09/11 10:32, , 37F
09/11 10:32, 37F
→
09/11 10:32, , 38F
09/11 10:32, 38F
→
09/11 10:33, , 39F
09/11 10:33, 39F
推
09/11 10:33, , 40F
09/11 10:33, 40F
→
09/11 10:36, , 41F
09/11 10:36, 41F
→
09/11 10:37, , 42F
09/11 10:37, 42F
推
09/11 10:38, , 43F
09/11 10:38, 43F
推
09/11 10:38, , 44F
09/11 10:38, 44F
→
09/11 10:40, , 45F
09/11 10:40, 45F
推
09/11 10:41, , 46F
09/11 10:41, 46F
噓
09/11 10:58, , 47F
09/11 10:58, 47F
噓
09/11 11:05, , 48F
09/11 11:05, 48F
噓
09/11 11:05, , 49F
09/11 11:05, 49F
噓
09/11 11:22, , 50F
09/11 11:22, 50F
推
09/11 11:24, , 51F
09/11 11:24, 51F
→
09/11 11:24, , 52F
09/11 11:24, 52F
推
09/11 11:29, , 53F
09/11 11:29, 53F
→
09/11 11:43, , 54F
09/11 11:43, 54F
噓
09/11 11:45, , 55F
09/11 11:45, 55F
推
09/11 11:46, , 56F
09/11 11:46, 56F
→
09/11 12:07, , 57F
09/11 12:07, 57F
推
09/11 12:31, , 58F
09/11 12:31, 58F
→
09/11 12:46, , 59F
09/11 12:46, 59F
→
09/11 13:31, , 60F
09/11 13:31, 60F
推
09/11 15:12, , 61F
09/11 15:12, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):