Re: [新聞] 納稅人花多少錢養軍公教? 統計系神回消失
我是不知道這是那門子的統計系
這樣教支出佔總佔比的計算
20萬人給6萬分,看起來不少才怪
自己公家機關,有實際資料不用
台灣一年稅收約二兆
年金支出約0.3兆
薪資支出平均4萬/月X13.5X20萬人口
約0.1兆去零頭
總佔比到二成
等於說我們繳得稅金有10塊有2塊進到公務員口袋
什麼鳥算法10萬0.3才養一個
只有下三濫的直銷跟詐騙集團
才會用這種騙術來矇人
不是程度三流就是道德下流
不管是哪一種
若流傳是真的
一毛錢花在養這種垃圾,我都嫌多
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.226.163
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505065754.A.9AC.html
噓
09/11 01:49, , 1F
09/11 01:49, 1F
→
09/11 01:49, , 2F
09/11 01:49, 2F
→
09/11 01:50, , 3F
09/11 01:50, 3F
→
09/11 01:50, , 4F
09/11 01:50, 4F
推
09/11 01:50, , 5F
09/11 01:50, 5F
→
09/11 01:50, , 6F
09/11 01:50, 6F
推
09/11 01:54, , 7F
09/11 01:54, 7F
垃圾跟族群沒關
大多都是個人問題
→
09/11 01:57, , 8F
09/11 01:57, 8F
→
09/11 01:58, , 9F
09/11 01:58, 9F
※ 編輯: WinNOKIA (180.217.226.163), 09/11/2017 02:00:11
→
09/11 01:59, , 10F
09/11 01:59, 10F
→
09/11 01:59, , 11F
09/11 01:59, 11F
→
09/11 01:59, , 12F
09/11 01:59, 12F
→
09/11 02:00, , 13F
09/11 02:00, 13F
→
09/11 02:00, , 14F
09/11 02:00, 14F
推
09/11 02:00, , 15F
09/11 02:00, 15F
→
09/11 02:00, , 16F
09/11 02:00, 16F
→
09/11 02:00, , 17F
09/11 02:00, 17F
→
09/11 02:00, , 18F
09/11 02:00, 18F
→
09/11 02:01, , 19F
09/11 02:01, 19F
→
09/11 02:01, , 20F
09/11 02:01, 20F
→
09/11 02:01, , 21F
09/11 02:01, 21F
軍公教拿多少
我不反對
畢竟人人考取機會平等
敢拿就不要怕
不要搞得跟詐騙集團一樣用騙術來矇人
但我是不認為軍公教有那麼墮落
推
09/11 02:04, , 22F
09/11 02:04, 22F
→
09/11 02:04, , 23F
09/11 02:04, 23F
→
09/11 02:04, , 24F
09/11 02:04, 24F
推
09/11 02:05, , 25F
09/11 02:05, 25F
推
09/11 02:06, , 26F
09/11 02:06, 26F
※ 編輯: WinNOKIA (180.217.226.163), 09/11/2017 02:10:19
推
09/11 02:07, , 27F
09/11 02:07, 27F
噓
09/11 02:08, , 28F
09/11 02:08, 28F
→
09/11 02:09, , 29F
09/11 02:09, 29F
→
09/11 02:09, , 30F
09/11 02:09, 30F
→
09/11 02:09, , 31F
09/11 02:09, 31F
→
09/11 02:09, , 32F
09/11 02:09, 32F
推
09/11 02:16, , 33F
09/11 02:16, 33F
推
09/11 02:17, , 34F
09/11 02:17, 34F
→
09/11 02:17, , 35F
09/11 02:17, 35F
還有 535 則推文
還有 4 段內文
→
09/11 09:45, , 571F
09/11 09:45, 571F
→
09/11 09:49, , 572F
09/11 09:49, 572F
推
09/11 09:56, , 573F
09/11 09:56, 573F
推
09/11 10:06, , 574F
09/11 10:06, 574F
推
09/11 10:29, , 575F
09/11 10:29, 575F
推
09/11 10:29, , 576F
09/11 10:29, 576F
推
09/11 10:29, , 577F
09/11 10:29, 577F
推
09/11 10:32, , 578F
09/11 10:32, 578F
推
09/11 10:43, , 579F
09/11 10:43, 579F
→
09/11 10:43, , 580F
09/11 10:43, 580F
推
09/11 10:49, , 581F
09/11 10:49, 581F
噓
09/11 11:25, , 582F
09/11 11:25, 582F
推
09/11 11:36, , 583F
09/11 11:36, 583F
噓
09/11 11:46, , 584F
09/11 11:46, 584F
→
09/11 11:47, , 585F
09/11 11:47, 585F
噓
09/11 11:58, , 586F
09/11 11:58, 586F
噓
09/11 12:16, , 587F
09/11 12:16, 587F
推
09/11 12:26, , 588F
09/11 12:26, 588F
噓
09/11 12:35, , 589F
09/11 12:35, 589F
→
09/11 12:54, , 590F
09/11 12:54, 590F
推
09/11 12:59, , 591F
09/11 12:59, 591F
噓
09/11 13:16, , 592F
09/11 13:16, 592F
推
09/11 13:18, , 593F
09/11 13:18, 593F
噓
09/11 13:59, , 594F
09/11 13:59, 594F
推
09/11 13:59, , 595F
09/11 13:59, 595F
→
09/11 14:16, , 596F
09/11 14:16, 596F
→
09/11 14:17, , 597F
09/11 14:17, 597F
→
09/11 14:17, , 598F
09/11 14:17, 598F
→
09/11 14:21, , 599F
09/11 14:21, 599F
→
09/11 14:22, , 600F
09/11 14:22, 600F
→
09/11 14:22, , 601F
09/11 14:22, 601F
→
09/11 14:32, , 602F
09/11 14:32, 602F
推
09/11 14:58, , 603F
09/11 14:58, 603F
推
09/11 18:28, , 604F
09/11 18:28, 604F
→
09/11 18:29, , 605F
09/11 18:29, 605F
→
09/11 21:00, , 606F
09/11 21:00, 606F

→
09/11 21:09, , 607F
09/11 21:09, 607F
推
09/11 21:17, , 608F
09/11 21:17, 608F
推
09/12 02:46, , 609F
09/12 02:46, 609F
噓
09/12 13:21, , 610F
09/12 13:21, 610F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 13 篇):