[問卦] 有沒有行天宮算不算台灣宗教清流的八卦?消失
台北行天宮實施不燒香讓空氣品質不受污染
然後又有冷氣開超強的圖書館讓社會大眾使用
也常常會辦一些藝文活動回饋大眾
本魯覺得行天宮真的為台灣社會奉獻良多
想問問大家覺得行天宮算不算是台灣宗教界的清流啊?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.206.6.194
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1505061683.A.B56.html
→
09/11 00:41, , 1F
09/11 00:41, 1F
→
09/11 00:41, , 2F
09/11 00:41, 2F
推
09/11 00:41, , 3F
09/11 00:41, 3F
→
09/11 00:41, , 4F
09/11 00:41, 4F
推
09/11 00:42, , 5F
09/11 00:42, 5F
→
09/11 00:42, , 6F
09/11 00:42, 6F
→
09/11 00:42, , 7F
09/11 00:42, 7F
推
09/11 00:42, , 8F
09/11 00:42, 8F
→
09/11 00:42, , 9F
09/11 00:42, 9F
→
09/11 00:43, , 10F
09/11 00:43, 10F
推
09/11 00:43, , 11F
09/11 00:43, 11F
本魯是很感謝他的圖書館啦
開放時間比市圖長
設施又不錯
※ 編輯: wangyuh (180.206.6.194), 09/11/2017 00:44:16
→
09/11 00:43, , 12F
09/11 00:43, 12F
推
09/11 00:43, , 13F
09/11 00:43, 13F
→
09/11 00:44, , 14F
09/11 00:44, 14F
→
09/11 00:45, , 15F
09/11 00:45, 15F
推
09/11 00:45, , 16F
09/11 00:45, 16F
→
09/11 00:45, , 17F
09/11 00:45, 17F
→
09/11 00:45, , 18F
09/11 00:45, 18F
推
09/11 00:46, , 19F
09/11 00:46, 19F
→
09/11 00:47, , 20F
09/11 00:47, 20F
真的
不過閱覽室男女分開不太合情理
※ 編輯: wangyuh (180.206.6.194), 09/11/2017 00:48:09
推
09/11 00:48, , 21F
09/11 00:48, 21F
→
09/11 00:48, , 22F
09/11 00:48, 22F
→
09/11 00:49, , 23F
09/11 00:49, 23F
→
09/11 00:49, , 24F
09/11 00:49, 24F
推
09/11 00:50, , 25F
09/11 00:50, 25F
推
09/11 00:53, , 26F
09/11 00:53, 26F
推
09/11 00:54, , 27F
09/11 00:54, 27F
→
09/11 00:57, , 28F
09/11 00:57, 28F
推
09/11 01:00, , 29F
09/11 01:00, 29F
→
09/11 01:15, , 30F
09/11 01:15, 30F
→
09/11 01:16, , 31F
09/11 01:16, 31F
推
09/11 01:16, , 32F
09/11 01:16, 32F
→
09/11 01:17, , 33F
09/11 01:17, 33F
推
09/11 01:18, , 34F
09/11 01:18, 34F
→
09/11 01:36, , 35F
09/11 01:36, 35F
→
09/11 01:36, , 36F
09/11 01:36, 36F
推
09/11 01:45, , 37F
09/11 01:45, 37F
推
09/11 01:46, , 38F
09/11 01:46, 38F
噓
09/11 01:50, , 39F
09/11 01:50, 39F
推
09/11 02:36, , 40F
09/11 02:36, 40F
推
09/11 02:53, , 41F
09/11 02:53, 41F
推
09/11 03:04, , 42F
09/11 03:04, 42F
→
09/11 03:18, , 43F
09/11 03:18, 43F
推
09/11 03:24, , 44F
09/11 03:24, 44F
→
09/11 07:27, , 45F
09/11 07:27, 45F
→
09/11 07:29, , 46F
09/11 07:29, 46F
推
09/11 07:33, , 47F
09/11 07:33, 47F
推
09/11 07:42, , 48F
09/11 07:42, 48F
推
09/11 08:15, , 49F
09/11 08:15, 49F
→
09/11 08:16, , 50F
09/11 08:16, 50F
推
09/11 08:37, , 51F
09/11 08:37, 51F
推
09/11 08:58, , 52F
09/11 08:58, 52F
推
09/11 09:12, , 53F
09/11 09:12, 53F
→
09/11 09:55, , 54F
09/11 09:55, 54F
推
09/11 10:16, , 55F
09/11 10:16, 55F
推
09/11 14:54, , 56F
09/11 14:54, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):