Re: [爆卦]同志熱線又在新竹辦多重性伴侶講座了消失
所以辦開放式性關係的講座跟愛滋病的關聯是?
開放式性關係你情我願 有妨礙到誰嗎
許多人結婚後外面有小三小四 這就不算開放式性關係就是了
啊 反正對於恐同來講
同性戀只要是做愛 都是髒髒 都是噁心 都有可能得愛滋嘛
但是異性戀性侵 偷吃 都只是八卦版-1而已嘛
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.121.117.9
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1504368031.A.389.html
→
09/03 00:01, , 1F
09/03 00:01, 1F
這個跟開放式性關係的關係是?
噓
09/03 00:01, , 2F
09/03 00:01, 2F
他們還蠻認真的啊
→
09/03 00:01, , 3F
09/03 00:01, 3F
推
09/03 00:02, , 4F
09/03 00:02, 4F
嘆
噓
09/03 00:02, , 5F
09/03 00:02, 5F
原來HIV是靠開放式性關係才能傳染的啊
→
09/03 00:02, , 6F
09/03 00:02, 6F
→
09/03 00:02, , 7F
09/03 00:02, 7F
濫交多P的文化 我想只要是人類都很多吧
同性戀 異性戀都是 不用分你我啦 (挖鼻
噓
09/03 00:03, , 8F
09/03 00:03, 8F
會講出那麼沒營養污辱人的話除了恐同外我也想不到還有誰了
推
09/03 00:03, , 9F
09/03 00:03, 9F
對它們來講就是沒差啊 搞不好還是個光榮的是呢
噓
09/03 00:03, , 10F
09/03 00:03, 10F
推
09/03 00:03, , 11F
09/03 00:03, 11F
→
09/03 00:03, , 12F
09/03 00:03, 12F
喜歡開放式性關係 跟爭取結婚權的關係是?
會有開放式性關係的人 就不會走入婚姻 要不然都會跟另一伴討論好
請問一下又跟自我設限有什麼關係 又不是所有同性戀都是開放式性關係
→
09/03 00:03, , 13F
09/03 00:03, 13F
異性雜交派對也都上新聞呢~~~~還不少
→
09/03 00:03, , 14F
09/03 00:03, 14F
噓
09/03 00:04, , 15F
09/03 00:04, 15F
麻煩快去爭取
推
09/03 00:04, , 16F
09/03 00:04, 16F
對他們來講就沒差啊
噓
09/03 00:04, , 17F
09/03 00:04, 17F
噓
09/03 00:04, , 18F
09/03 00:04, 18F
那跟開放式性關係的連結在哪?
→
09/03 00:04, , 19F
09/03 00:04, 19F
砲友天天換 異性戀好像也很多齁
但還是要提醒大家要記得戴套呦
→
09/03 00:05, , 20F
09/03 00:05, 20F
→
09/03 00:05, , 21F
09/03 00:05, 21F
挖屋 這帽子會不會扣太大啦 要不要看一下每種疾病拿的補助各有多少啊
原來愛滋補助會拖垮台灣的外交 真的是太不該了
噓
09/03 00:05, , 22F
09/03 00:05, 22F
雜交跟同婚的關聯是.....可以帶腦嗎?
→
09/03 00:05, , 23F
09/03 00:05, 23F
推
09/03 00:05, , 24F
09/03 00:05, 24F
還有 133 則推文
還有 33 段內文
→
09/03 01:13, , 158F
09/03 01:13, 158F
→
09/03 01:13, , 159F
09/03 01:13, 159F
→
09/03 01:14, , 160F
09/03 01:14, 160F
→
09/03 01:15, , 161F
09/03 01:15, 161F
→
09/03 01:15, , 162F
09/03 01:15, 162F
→
09/03 01:16, , 163F
09/03 01:16, 163F
→
09/03 01:17, , 164F
09/03 01:17, 164F
→
09/03 01:17, , 165F
09/03 01:17, 165F
推
09/03 01:17, , 166F
09/03 01:17, 166F
→
09/03 01:18, , 167F
09/03 01:18, 167F
→
09/03 01:19, , 168F
09/03 01:19, 168F
→
09/03 01:19, , 169F
09/03 01:19, 169F
推
09/03 01:20, , 170F
09/03 01:20, 170F
推
09/03 01:21, , 171F
09/03 01:21, 171F
噓
09/03 01:22, , 172F
09/03 01:22, 172F
→
09/03 01:22, , 173F
09/03 01:22, 173F
→
09/03 01:22, , 174F
09/03 01:22, 174F
推
09/03 01:23, , 175F
09/03 01:23, 175F
→
09/03 01:23, , 176F
09/03 01:23, 176F
推
09/03 01:25, , 177F
09/03 01:25, 177F
→
09/03 01:26, , 178F
09/03 01:26, 178F
推
09/03 01:27, , 179F
09/03 01:27, 179F
→
09/03 01:27, , 180F
09/03 01:27, 180F
→
09/03 01:27, , 181F
09/03 01:27, 181F
→
09/03 01:28, , 182F
09/03 01:28, 182F
→
09/03 01:29, , 183F
09/03 01:29, 183F
推
09/03 01:34, , 184F
09/03 01:34, 184F
噓
09/03 01:46, , 185F
09/03 01:46, 185F
→
09/03 01:46, , 186F
09/03 01:46, 186F
噓
09/03 02:17, , 187F
09/03 02:17, 187F
→
09/03 02:18, , 188F
09/03 02:18, 188F
噓
09/03 02:19, , 189F
09/03 02:19, 189F
噓
09/03 02:21, , 190F
09/03 02:21, 190F

→
09/03 02:21, , 191F
09/03 02:21, 191F
→
09/03 02:22, , 192F
09/03 02:22, 192F
→
09/04 07:05, , 193F
09/04 07:05, 193F
推
09/05 13:29, , 194F
09/05 13:29, 194F
噓
09/06 23:14, , 195F
09/06 23:14, 195F
→
09/06 23:14, , 196F
09/06 23:14, 196F
推
10/20 17:29, , 197F
10/20 17:29, 197F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 5 篇):