[問卦] 台灣城市為主場的球隊不能加入日職?消失
台灣職棒以台灣的城市做為主場加入日職,為何不可能!
美國MLB,有1支球隊有加拿大城市作為主場加入
美國NBA,有1支球隊有加拿大城市作為主場加入
美國NHL,有6支球隊是加拿大城市作為主場加入
美國MLS,有3支球隊是加拿大城市作為主場加入
澳洲A-League,目前也有1支球隊是以紐西蘭城市為主場加入
加拿大是有要加入美國嗎? 紐西蘭是有要加入澳洲?根本沒有嘛,到底哪有矮化的問題
?
另外,加入日職,台灣職棒隊伍就都要變日本人?大家是這麼瞧不起我們的球員實力嗎?
台灣職棒球員的實力是有目共睹的,但缺的就是很現實的薪水跟資源,想要好的待遇當然
要靠好的票房來供給,現在票房慘澹到連四隊能不能維持都是問題了,增加隊伍就一定能
解決嗎?不管這個立委好不好,至少加入日職這個點子我覺得是可行的,當然做不做得到
是要看以後怎麼跟日職談。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.135.200.158
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1504004872.A.DB7.html
推
08/29 19:08, , 1F
08/29 19:08, 1F
→
08/29 19:08, , 2F
08/29 19:08, 2F
推
08/29 19:08, , 3F
08/29 19:08, 3F
推
08/29 19:08, , 4F
08/29 19:08, 4F
→
08/29 19:09, , 5F
08/29 19:09, 5F
→
08/29 19:09, , 6F
08/29 19:09, 6F
推
08/29 19:09, , 7F
08/29 19:09, 7F
噓
08/29 19:10, , 8F
08/29 19:10, 8F
推
08/29 19:10, , 9F
08/29 19:10, 9F
→
08/29 19:10, , 10F
08/29 19:10, 10F
→
08/29 19:10, , 11F
08/29 19:10, 11F
推
08/29 19:10, , 12F
08/29 19:10, 12F
→
08/29 19:11, , 13F
08/29 19:11, 13F
推
08/29 19:14, , 14F
08/29 19:14, 14F
推
08/29 19:14, , 15F
08/29 19:14, 15F
→
08/29 19:15, , 16F
08/29 19:15, 16F
推
08/29 19:15, , 17F
08/29 19:15, 17F
噓
08/29 19:15, , 18F
08/29 19:15, 18F
→
08/29 19:16, , 19F
08/29 19:16, 19F
→
08/29 19:16, , 20F
08/29 19:16, 20F
→
08/29 19:16, , 21F
08/29 19:16, 21F
推
08/29 19:16, , 22F
08/29 19:16, 22F
→
08/29 19:17, , 23F
08/29 19:17, 23F
→
08/29 19:17, , 24F
08/29 19:17, 24F
→
08/29 19:17, , 25F
08/29 19:17, 25F
→
08/29 19:17, , 26F
08/29 19:17, 26F
→
08/29 19:17, , 27F
08/29 19:17, 27F
→
08/29 19:18, , 28F
08/29 19:18, 28F
噓
08/29 19:18, , 29F
08/29 19:18, 29F
噓
08/29 19:18, , 30F
08/29 19:18, 30F
→
08/29 19:18, , 31F
08/29 19:18, 31F
→
08/29 19:19, , 32F
08/29 19:19, 32F
→
08/29 19:19, , 33F
08/29 19:19, 33F
→
08/29 19:19, , 34F
08/29 19:19, 34F
→
08/29 19:19, , 35F
08/29 19:19, 35F
→
08/29 19:19, , 36F
08/29 19:19, 36F
→
08/29 19:20, , 37F
08/29 19:20, 37F
→
08/29 19:20, , 38F
08/29 19:20, 38F
→
08/29 19:20, , 39F
08/29 19:20, 39F
還有 28 則推文
→
08/29 19:28, , 68F
08/29 19:28, 68F
→
08/29 19:28, , 69F
08/29 19:28, 69F
→
08/29 19:28, , 70F
08/29 19:28, 70F
→
08/29 19:29, , 71F
08/29 19:29, 71F
→
08/29 19:29, , 72F
08/29 19:29, 72F
→
08/29 19:30, , 73F
08/29 19:30, 73F
→
08/29 19:30, , 74F
08/29 19:30, 74F
→
08/29 19:30, , 75F
08/29 19:30, 75F
→
08/29 19:30, , 76F
08/29 19:30, 76F
→
08/29 19:30, , 77F
08/29 19:30, 77F
推
08/29 19:30, , 78F
08/29 19:30, 78F
→
08/29 19:31, , 79F
08/29 19:31, 79F
噓
08/29 19:31, , 80F
08/29 19:31, 80F
→
08/29 19:31, , 81F
08/29 19:31, 81F
→
08/29 19:31, , 82F
08/29 19:31, 82F
→
08/29 19:32, , 83F
08/29 19:32, 83F
→
08/29 19:32, , 84F
08/29 19:32, 84F
→
08/29 19:32, , 85F
08/29 19:32, 85F
→
08/29 19:33, , 86F
08/29 19:33, 86F
→
08/29 19:33, , 87F
08/29 19:33, 87F
→
08/29 19:34, , 88F
08/29 19:34, 88F
→
08/29 19:34, , 89F
08/29 19:34, 89F
推
08/29 19:34, , 90F
08/29 19:34, 90F
→
08/29 19:35, , 91F
08/29 19:35, 91F
→
08/29 19:35, , 92F
08/29 19:35, 92F
→
08/29 19:35, , 93F
08/29 19:35, 93F
→
08/29 19:35, , 94F
08/29 19:35, 94F
推
08/29 19:35, , 95F
08/29 19:35, 95F
→
08/29 19:36, , 96F
08/29 19:36, 96F
→
08/29 19:36, , 97F
08/29 19:36, 97F
噓
08/29 19:37, , 98F
08/29 19:37, 98F
推
08/29 19:40, , 99F
08/29 19:40, 99F
噓
08/29 19:50, , 100F
08/29 19:50, 100F
噓
08/29 20:13, , 101F
08/29 20:13, 101F
噓
08/29 20:14, , 102F
08/29 20:14, 102F
推
08/29 20:40, , 103F
08/29 20:40, 103F
→
08/29 20:40, , 104F
08/29 20:40, 104F
噓
08/29 21:33, , 105F
08/29 21:33, 105F
推
08/30 09:28, , 106F
08/30 09:28, 106F
→
08/30 09:28, , 107F
08/30 09:28, 107F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 8 篇):