Re: [問卦] 如果清交 工研院 科學園都在高雄會怎樣?消失
※ 引述《antivenom (antivenom)》之銘言:
: 以前交大曾計畫遷校至高雄澄清湖
: 經過地方人士慰留以及眾多的因素
: 最後交大繼續留在新竹
: 如果當初
: 清 交 工研院 科學園區等機構
: 一開始就全部都放在高雄
: 那現在的高雄會變得怎麼樣???
這真的是高雄最缺的
以前的同學 一個跑去中研院 一個跑去工研院
一個博士畢業後就留在交大工作 很多很多個跑去新竹科學園區
只能說 這些人在規劃的時候 真的很像在故意創治高雄人
故意要讓高雄年輕人回不了高雄
希望 高雄能有更多的高教資源 以及能有像樣的科技業進駐
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.77.230.72
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1502981916.A.D44.html
噓
08/17 22:59, , 1F
08/17 22:59, 1F
你錯了 這些規劃真的都是中央在規劃!!!!!
科學園區 高教資源分配 都是中央的權限!!!!!!!!
→
08/17 22:59, , 2F
08/17 22:59, 2F
→
08/17 22:59, , 3F
08/17 22:59, 3F
推
08/17 22:59, , 4F
08/17 22:59, 4F
※ 編輯: skylion (42.77.230.72), 08/17/2017 23:01:39
→
08/17 23:01, , 5F
08/17 23:01, 5F
推
08/17 23:01, , 6F
08/17 23:01, 6F
中央政府的規劃者....
※ 編輯: skylion (42.77.230.72), 08/17/2017 23:02:18
→
08/17 23:02, , 7F
08/17 23:02, 7F
→
08/17 23:02, , 8F
08/17 23:02, 8F
噓
08/17 23:03, , 9F
08/17 23:03, 9F
推
08/17 23:04, , 10F
08/17 23:04, 10F
→
08/17 23:05, , 11F
08/17 23:05, 11F
推
08/17 23:07, , 12F
08/17 23:07, 12F
噓
08/17 23:07, , 13F
08/17 23:07, 13F
→
08/17 23:09, , 14F
08/17 23:09, 14F
噓
08/17 23:10, , 15F
08/17 23:10, 15F
→
08/17 23:10, , 16F
08/17 23:10, 16F
噓
08/17 23:12, , 17F
08/17 23:12, 17F
→
08/17 23:12, , 18F
08/17 23:12, 18F
→
08/17 23:14, , 19F
08/17 23:14, 19F
→
08/17 23:14, , 20F
08/17 23:14, 20F
噓
08/17 23:15, , 21F
08/17 23:15, 21F
→
08/17 23:16, , 22F
08/17 23:16, 22F
噓
08/17 23:16, , 23F
08/17 23:16, 23F
→
08/17 23:17, , 24F
08/17 23:17, 24F
→
08/17 23:18, , 25F
08/17 23:18, 25F
→
08/17 23:18, , 26F
08/17 23:18, 26F
→
08/17 23:18, , 27F
08/17 23:18, 27F
→
08/17 23:19, , 28F
08/17 23:19, 28F
→
08/17 23:19, , 29F
08/17 23:19, 29F
→
08/17 23:19, , 30F
08/17 23:19, 30F
→
08/17 23:19, , 31F
08/17 23:19, 31F
→
08/17 23:20, , 32F
08/17 23:20, 32F
→
08/17 23:20, , 33F
08/17 23:20, 33F
→
08/17 23:20, , 34F
08/17 23:20, 34F
→
08/17 23:20, , 35F
08/17 23:20, 35F
→
08/17 23:20, , 36F
08/17 23:20, 36F
→
08/17 23:21, , 37F
08/17 23:21, 37F
→
08/17 23:21, , 38F
08/17 23:21, 38F
→
08/17 23:22, , 39F
08/17 23:22, 39F
推
08/17 23:22, , 40F
08/17 23:22, 40F
→
08/17 23:22, , 41F
08/17 23:22, 41F
噓
08/17 23:23, , 42F
08/17 23:23, 42F
→
08/17 23:24, , 43F
08/17 23:24, 43F
→
08/17 23:24, , 44F
08/17 23:24, 44F
→
08/17 23:24, , 45F
08/17 23:24, 45F
→
08/17 23:24, , 46F
08/17 23:24, 46F
噓
08/17 23:24, , 47F
08/17 23:24, 47F
→
08/17 23:25, , 48F
08/17 23:25, 48F
噓
08/17 23:25, , 49F
08/17 23:25, 49F
→
08/17 23:26, , 50F
08/17 23:26, 50F
噓
08/17 23:26, , 51F
08/17 23:26, 51F
→
08/17 23:26, , 52F
08/17 23:26, 52F
→
08/17 23:27, , 53F
08/17 23:27, 53F
→
08/17 23:27, , 54F
08/17 23:27, 54F
→
08/17 23:27, , 55F
08/17 23:27, 55F
→
08/17 23:27, , 56F
08/17 23:27, 56F
→
08/17 23:27, , 57F
08/17 23:27, 57F
→
08/17 23:28, , 58F
08/17 23:28, 58F
→
08/17 23:29, , 59F
08/17 23:29, 59F
→
08/17 23:29, , 60F
08/17 23:29, 60F
噓
08/17 23:33, , 61F
08/17 23:33, 61F
→
08/17 23:33, , 62F
08/17 23:33, 62F
噓
08/17 23:43, , 63F
08/17 23:43, 63F
推
08/18 14:36, , 64F
08/18 14:36, 64F
推
09/15 20:25, , 65F
09/15 20:25, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):