Re: [新聞] 女權人士: 敦克爾克缺乏女角 淪父權論述消失

看板Gossiping作者時間8年前 (2017/08/16 19:56), 編輯推噓7(10319)
留言32則, 21人參與, 最新討論串2/17 (看更多)
笑死 那個年代的男人在打仗 那女人在哪裡 還不是躲起來雞雞叫 然後被戰勝國的男人當畜牲先姦在殺 要女角? 去投降後的德國柏林找啊 要不就去各地軍營附近的妓女戶裡面找 ※ 引述《fffffff4 (使用者在線上)》之銘言: : 來源: : The daily caller : 標題: : Feminist Says Dunkirk Is A Bad Movie Because It Screams ‘Men-Only’ : 女權人士: 敦克爾克缺乏女角 淪父權論述 : 內文: : Christopher Nolan’s “Dunkirk” is being celebrated as one of the strongest m : ovies of the year—and may perhaps rank among one of the best war movies ever : made alongside “Saving Private Ryan,” “Hacksaw Ridge,” and “Black Hawk Do : wn.” Like the other great films, it doesn’t glorify war, but instead emphasi : zes the tragedy of war. But because male critics are praising it, women’s mag : azine Marie Claire has seen fit to trash the film for “celebrating maleness” : —asking instead why war movies aren’t being made for women. : 敦克爾克被譽為最偉大的戰爭電影,與搶救雷恩大兵等電影齊名。但女性雜誌Marie Clai : re卻批評本電影「高抬男性氣質」,並質疑戰爭片為什麼無法讓女性感動。 : Writing for Marie Claire, Mehera Bonner declared “Dunkirk” to be “basic.” : “And look, it’s not like I need every movie to have ‘strong female leads.’ : Wonder Woman can probably tide me over for at least a year and I understand t : hat this was dominated by brave male soldiers. I get that,” she wrote, before : slamming the film for its “general vibe.” : Despite enjoying the film’s intense moments and even the performances of its : actors, including One Direction’s Harry Styles in his first big screen appear : ance, the Marie Claire writer slams Dunkirk for being “designed for men to ma : n-out over.” : 雜誌專欄作家Mehera Bonner表示,敦克爾克很平庸的一部片。她說:「我不是要每部電 : 影都有女強人當主角,我很喜歡神力女超人,但我也了解戰爭是男人打的。」 : 但她也批評敦克爾克是為男人而拍的電影。 : “The tenor of the people applauding it just screams ‘men-only’,” she conti : nued, citing that the only reason male critics liked it was because it allowed : them to feel manly. : 她表示,只有男人才能欣賞此片,男人之所以喜歡,是因為看完會覺得有男子氣概。 : Bonner continues: “To me, Dunkirk felt like an excuse for men to celebrate ma : leness—which apparently they don’t get to do enough. Fine, great, go forth, : but if Nolan’s entire purpose is breaking the established war movie mold and : doing something different—why not make a movie about women in World War II?” : The Marie Claire writer argues that it’s the responsibility of top-tier dire : ctors like Nolan to make the films she wants more of. : 敦克爾克成了男人高抬男子氣概的藉口。 : 如果諾蘭導演想要打破戰爭片傳統,何不拍部二戰中的女性? : This year’s “Wonder Woman” and “Atomic Blonde” are both highly rated film : s, revealing little gender bias among film critics. Likewise, the female-drive : n “Mad Max: Fury Road” was equally enjoyed by critics of either sex, earning : it a spot as one of the highest rated films ever made. Films about women in t : imes of war have been made, several to critical acclaim—including “Zero Dark : Thirty” and “The English Patient.” According to film reviewers, each of th : ese films broke the mold by taking typically male settings and centering them : around female protagonists. : Dunkirk was a prominent event in military history, but is rarely given notice : in pop culture. To anyone who’s heard of Dunkirk, the evacuation is largely r : emembered as both a miracle and a disaster for the Allied forces in Europe dur : ing World War II. Failing to defend France against the Germans, the British we : re forced to evacuate over 338,000 troops with the aid of private civilians. : However, over 30,000 troops were left behind to be captured as prisoners of wa : r to the German army. The British press managed to turn the loss into a sort o : f victory with the “Dunkirk Spirit” that showed the solidarity of the Britis : h people in saving the lives of their countrymen. With “Dunkirk,” Christophe : r Nolan shed light on an event that would’ve otherwise relegated to the histo : ry books. : https://tinyurl.com/ybutwwoh -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.76.8.74 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1502884582.A.F73.html

08/16 19:58, , 1F
在船上當護士阿
08/16 19:58, 1F

08/16 19:58, , 2F
你錯了..那時的女人頂替男人在兵工廠生產 or 做男人的工作
08/16 19:58, 2F

08/16 20:00, , 3F
蘇聯有女兵啦
08/16 20:00, 3F

08/16 20:00, , 4F
推樓上 但不爽就拍一部女人的啊 拍得好就不怕沒人看
08/16 20:00, 4F

08/16 20:00, , 5F
在工廠生產東西至少安全 男的就活該去戰場送死喔
08/16 20:00, 5F

08/16 20:01, , 6F
不然呢? 自助餐就是這樣啊 還好不是史達林格勒 人肉絞肉機哩
08/16 20:01, 6F

08/16 20:01, , 7F
工廠只是比較安全,英國可是被炸得快崩潰了
08/16 20:01, 7F

08/16 20:02, , 8F
被炸得快崩潰是德國吧
08/16 20:02, 8F

08/16 20:02, , 9F
帝國的毀滅倒是蠻多女角的
08/16 20:02, 9F

08/16 20:03, , 10F
別說成這樣 英國空軍能在空戰取得優勢,女性在指揮
08/16 20:03, 10F

08/16 20:03, , 11F
部工作也出了很大的力
08/16 20:03, 11F

08/16 20:04, , 12F
那電影只拍前線的話 就只能乖乖被嘴了? 沒拍到指揮部 怎麼辦?
08/16 20:04, 12F

08/16 20:05, , 13F
二戰就是女性進職場女權才抬頭
08/16 20:05, 13F

08/16 20:06, , 14F
我沒記錯的話 這部又不是講空軍?
08/16 20:06, 14F

08/16 20:18, , 15F
這部明明講後撤,很多平民區
08/16 20:18, 15F

08/16 20:21, , 16F
戰爭是很父權的。甚至可以說,是戰爭促成父權社會主流
08/16 20:21, 16F

08/16 20:23, , 17F
的確是這樣阿,冷兵器時代,雄性的個體戰力平均職一
08/16 20:23, 17F

08/16 20:23, , 18F
定超過女性阿,然後男的就死掉了
08/16 20:23, 18F

08/16 20:25, , 19F
父權是建築在死的都雄的,什麼你說雌的破城更慘?
08/16 20:25, 19F

08/16 20:25, , 20F
那武裝上戰場證明雌性的價值阿
08/16 20:25, 20F

08/16 20:26, , 21F
女權硬吵戲份還滿煩的,怎不去吵格雷都是女的被打,應該要
08/16 20:26, 21F

08/16 20:26, , 22F
長出巨型棒棒把男主的801穴幹到外翻
08/16 20:26, 22F

08/16 20:30, , 23F
以前衛生條件差死亡率高,成年女性要一直生育補充人力
08/16 20:30, 23F

08/16 20:30, , 24F
丟到戰場反而是浪費
08/16 20:30, 24F

08/16 22:17, , 25F
二戰女性也是要做工的 因為男人都去打仗了 工作量更大
08/16 22:17, 25F

08/16 22:35, , 26F
柏林保衛戰時德國也有女性操作高射砲的
08/16 22:35, 26F

08/16 22:48, , 27F
虎洨
08/16 22:48, 27F

08/16 22:54, , 28F
知識貧乏 二戰女性後援醫療幫助很大
08/16 22:54, 28F

08/16 23:20, , 29F
87 東線一堆女兵
08/16 23:20, 29F

08/17 10:33, , 30F
看太平洋戰爭 還是那個諾曼地 女性負責醫護工作有描寫到
08/17 10:33, 30F

08/17 11:06, , 31F
我沒記錯的話戰爭中後勤很多都是女性負責的...
08/17 11:06, 31F

08/18 22:41, , 32F
不懂裝懂欸
08/18 22:41, 32F
文章代碼(AID): #1Pb3Bczp (Gossiping)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 17 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1Pb3Bczp (Gossiping)